Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Penile Block For Analgesia In Pediatric Circumcision

December 23, 2025 updated by: Münevver Kayhan, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing The Analgesic Effectiveness Of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block And Penile Block In Children Undergoing Circumcision Surgery

Circumcision is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures in childhood and is associated with significant postoperative pain. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the analgesic effectiveness of sacral erector spinae plane block (sacral ESPB) and penile nerve block (PNB) in children undergoing circumcision surgery. The primary outcome is postoperative pain, assessed using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale at predefined time intervals within the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include intraoperative analgesic consumption, time to first postoperative analgesic requirement, perioperative hemodynamic changes. The results of this study are expected to provide evidence for selecting the optimal regional analgesic technique for pediatric circumcision surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Circumcision is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in childhood and is associated with significant postoperative pain. Inadequate analgesia in pediatric patients may lead to adverse hemodynamic, hormonal, metabolic, and immunological responses, as well as increased agitation and discomfort. Therefore, a multimodal analgesia (MMA) approach is recommended to prevent the onset of pain and provide effective perioperative analgesia. Regional anesthesia (RA) techniques offer safe, effective, and hemodynamically stable analgesia in pediatric patients. Penile nerve block (PNB) is a commonly used RA technique for circumcision, performed by subcutaneous infiltration of local anesthetic around the glans penis and penoscrotal junction. More recently, the sacral erector spinae plane block (sacral ESPB) has been introduced as an alternative RA method, providing wide analgesic coverage by affecting the pudendal nerve and its branches. Sacral ESPB has been successfully applied in pediatric urogenital and anorectal surgeries, demonstrating effective postoperative analgesia.

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the analgesic effectiveness of sacral ESPB and PNB in children aged 1-12 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II undergoing circumcision surgery. Participants will be randomly allocated using a closed-envelope method to one of two groups. The PNB group will receive 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine via circumferential subcutaneous injection along the penoscrotal line. The sacral ESPB group will receive 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine under ultrasound (USG) guidance using an in-plane, cranio-caudal technique. All procedures will be performed by pediatric anesthesia faculty experienced in RA. Premedication will include intravenous (IV) midazolam 0.05 mg/kg and ketamine 0.5 mg/kg. General anesthesia (GA) will be induced with IV propofol 2-3 mg/kg, fentanyl 1 µg/kg, and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg, followed by endotracheal intubation and maintenance with sevoflurane 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC). Intraoperative monitoring will include electrocardiography (ECG), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂), and non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP). Hemodynamic changes exceeding 20% from baseline will be treated with remifentanil infusion.

Blinding (Körleme): This study will be conducted using a double-blind design. The patients and the investigators responsible for postoperative pain assessment and data collection will be unaware of group allocation. Only the anesthesiologists performing the blocks will know which intervention (PNB or sacral ESPB) is administered to ensure patient safety. This approach minimizes bias and ensures objective evaluation of outcomes.

Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale, which ranges from 0 to 10 points. A higher FLACC score indicates more severe pain, while a lower score indicates less pain. Analgesic administration will follow a standardized protocol: FLACC ≤3 indicates sufficient analgesia; FLACC 4-6 will be treated with IV paracetamol 10 mg/kg; FLACC ≥7 will be treated with IV fentanyl 0.5 µg/kg in the recovery unit. On the ward, oral paracetamol 10 mg/kg or ibuprofen 10 mg/kg will be administered according to FLACC scores. Phone follow-up at 16 and 24 hours will monitor pain scores and rescue analgesic consumption.

The primary outcome is postoperative pain within the first 24 hours as measured by FLACC scores. Secondary outcomes include intraoperative analgesic consumption, time to first postoperative analgesic requirement, perioperative hemodynamic changes, time to first urination, parental satisfaction, and postoperative adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, or block-related complications.

This study aims to determine the optimal regional analgesic technique for pediatric circumcision surgery by comparing the efficacy, safety, and satisfaction outcomes of sacral ESPB and PNB.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Pinar Kendigelen, Professor Doctor
  • Phone Number: 02124143000
  • Email: pinarken@gmail.com

Study Locations

    • Istanbul
      • Bakırköy, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye), 34153
        • Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medicine of Faculty
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 1 and 12 years
  • Scheduled for circumcision surgery
  • Classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II
  • Written informed consent obtained from both the participant (when appropriate) and their parents or legal guardians

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 1 year or over 12 years
  • Undergoing circumcision combined with other surgical procedures
  • Presence of neurological deficits
  • History of bleeding diathesis
  • Allergy to local anesthetic (LA) drugs
  • Redness or infection at the injection site
  • Presence of congenital sacral anomalies
  • Mental retardation
  • Psychiatric disorders or kidney disease
  • Refusal to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Penile Nerve Block (PNB) group
Participants in this group will receive the standard penile nerve block prior to surgery. The block is performed by subcutaneous infiltration of 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine around the ventral penoscrotal junction and base of the penis. This is the standard clinical practice group used for comparison.
Participants will receive the standard penile nerve block prior to surgery. 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine is infiltrated subcutaneously around the ventral penoscrotal junction and base of the penis. This serves as the standard comparator.
Experimental: Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block (SESPB) group
Participants in this group will receive a sacral ESPB before circumcision surgery. The block is performed with 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance using an in-plane, craniocaudal approach while the child is in the prone position. This is the investigational intervention being studied for analgesic effectiveness and safety.
Participants will receive a sacral ESPB prior to circumcision surgery. 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected under ultrasound guidance using an in-plane, craniocaudal approach while the child is in the prone position. This is the investigational procedure being studied for analgesic effectiveness and safety.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain Scores within 24 Hours
Time Frame: 0-24 hours after circumcision surgery
Postoperative pain will be assessed using the FLACC scale (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) at multiple time points (0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively). Scores range from 0-10, where higher scores indicate more severe pain and lower scores indicate less pain. The primary outcome is the comparison of pain levels between the Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block (SESPB) group and the Penile Nerve Block (PNB) group during the first 24 hours after surgery.
0-24 hours after circumcision surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Analgesic Consumption in 24 Hours
Time Frame: 0-24 hours postoperatively
Total amount of analgesics (intravenous and oral) administered within the first 24 hours after surgery will be recorded.
0-24 hours postoperatively
Intraoperative Analgesic Consumption
Time Frame: During surgery
Total dose of remifentanil administered intraoperatively will be recorded and compared between the SESPB and PNB groups.
During surgery
Time to First Analgesic Requirement
Time Frame: 0-24 hours postoperatively
Time from the end of surgery to the first need for rescue analgesia will be measured.
0-24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ayse Cigdem Tutuncu, Professor Doctor, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medicine of Faculty
  • Principal Investigator: Munevver Kayhan, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medicine of Faculty
  • Study Chair: Pinar Kendigelen, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medicine of Faculty
  • Study Chair: Ali Ekber Hakalmaz, Lecturer Doctor, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medicine of Faculty

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 20, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 10, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ctf-sakral sünnet-03

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Regional Anaesthesia

Clinical Trials on Penile Nerve Block (PNB)

Subscribe