Comparison of Surgical Repair Versus Functional Treatment in Patients With Proximal ACL Tear (SUTUFONC)

Isolated ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can be proximal, distal or occur in the middle of the ACL.

Treatment of patients with proximal lesions should be graded. Functional treatment can be reserved for low-demanding patients in whom the practice level is limited and the risk of progression to a knee functionally unstable less marked. In athletes, the risk of a new sprain must be explained and the patient will choose a functional treatment or a surgical treatment.

Few studies exist in the literature on the superiority of surgical treatment compared to functional treatment. In this context, this study is based on the hypothesis that patients undergoing ACL surgical repair have better functional scores and more intense sport activity than patients with functional treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Isolated ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are ligament injuries which lead to the most surgical interventions on the capsuloligamentous system of the knee. These ruptures can be proximal, distal or occur in the middle of the ACL.

Treatment of patients with proximal lesions should be graded and should take into account patient's symptoms (feeling of instability), physical examination data, amount of residual ligament, sport practice, practice level, time interval since the initial trauma, work requirements… Functional treatment can be reserved for low-demanding patients in whom the practice level is limited and the risk of progression to a knee functionally unstable (positive pivot shift) less marked. In athletes, the risk of a new sprain must be explained and the patient will choose a functional treatment or a surgical treatment.

Functional treatment is variable, combining the use of splints, rehabilitation, muscle strengthening. The healing time is three months. Wearing a splint has not proven its effectiveness in preventing progression to rupture complete when resuming sporting activities. If instability is revealed, it is then necessary move towards ACL reconstruction treatment.

Surgical treatment generally involves ligamentoplasty at the expense of a knee tendon to replace the ruptured ACL. In the context of ACL proximal tear, the patient may be offered surgical repair of the ACL.

There are many studies on the results of ACL ligamentoplasties but literature is poor on the outcomes of modern ACL repairs. Surgical repair of the proximal rupture of ACL has experienced renewed interest in recent years thanks to the appearance of new fixing systems. Used in the 70s and 80s, this technique was gradually little abandoned in the mid-1980s following disappointing results in favor autograft reconstruction techniques.

Few studies exist in the literature on the superiority of surgical treatment compared to functional treatment. In this context, this study is based on the hypothesis that patients undergoing ACL surgical repair have better functional scores and more intense sport activity than patients with functional treatment.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

144

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Choisir Une Région
      • Lille, Choisir Une Région, France, 59800
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital privé La Louvière
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with ACL tear treated with functional or surgery treatment

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient, male or female, aged ≥ 18 years
  • Patient with no history of knee surgery except meniscal surgery
  • Patient whose period is less than 3 months between the date of the accident and the surgery
  • Patient with an isolated proximal Sherman 1 or 2 ACL tear
  • Patient with a proximal Sherman 1 or 2 ACL tear associated to a stable meniscal lesion or to an MCL or LCL lesion grade 1 or 2 but not grade 3
  • Patient practicing a non-contact pivot sport (sliding sports, board sports,racket)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with contralateral ACL tear
  • Patient practicing a pivot sport with contacts
  • Patient presenting external rotary jumps ++ and +++
  • Patient with an ACL tear Sherman 3 or 4
  • Patient with meniscal lesions in the shape of a bucket handle or tabs unstable meniscals
  • Patient with a surgical history on the knee concerned

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Functional treatment
Functional treatment combines the use of splints, rehabilitation and muscle strengthening
Surgical treatment
Surgical treatment means ACL tear repair

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) score
Time Frame: 1 day
Subjective IKDC score is based on 10 questions linded to knee status. This score is ranging from 0 to 100. 100 means a level of sport activity and daily activity without any limit in the absence of any symptoms.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 11, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RGDS-2022-12-063

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ACL - Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency

Subscribe