Trial Evaluating the Safety of 2 Schedules of Cabazitaxel in Elderly Men With mCRPC Previously Treated With a Docetaxel (CABASTY)

Randomized Multicenter, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Safety of 2 Schedules of Cabazitaxel (Bi-weekly Versus Tri-weekly) Plus Prednisone in Elderly Men (≥ 65years) With mCRPC Previously Treated With a Docetaxel-containing Regimen

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and/or neutropenic complications (febrile neutropenia, neutropenic infection) with two schedules of cabazitaxel (bi-weekly versus tri-weekly) plus prednisone in elderly men (≥ 65 years) with mCRPC previously treated with a docetaxel-containing regimen.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial in mCRPC patients aged ≥ 65 years.

Number of subjects:

Total:170 to 200 (85 to 100 per arm)

Treatment:

  • Arm A : cabazitaxel 25 mg/m² on Day 1 of a 3-week cycle plus daily prednisone or
  • Arm B: cabazitaxel 16 mg/m² on Day 1 and Day 15 of a 4-week cycle plus daily prednisone.
  • Treatment will be continued for a maximum of 10 cycles unless there is documented disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
  • Standard cabazitaxel premedication will be used
  • Prophylactic G-CSF (GRANOCYTE) will be injected from Day 3 to Day 7 after every administration cycle of cabazitaxel· All new hormonal treatment, including ODM-201, prior to study entry is allowed.
  • Patients who received Radium-223 are eligible for this study
  • Treatment with LHRH should not be discontinued.

Exploratory assessments:

CT-Scan (abdominal/pelvic/chest) or whole body MRI and Bone scan: at screening, every 3 months and EOT.

FACT-P questionnaire:at C1D1,each subsequent visit and EOT

Exploratory substudy Blood samples will be collected in France (4 or 6 sites) and the Netherlands (2 sites). Biomarker analysis will be conducted at the Urology and The Tumor Immunology Laboratory at Radboud UMC in NL.

Biomarker schedule Arm A (25mg/m2): Baseline - Week 6 - Week 12 - at progression Arm B (16mg/m2): Baseline - Week 6 - Week 12 - at progression Optional sample points are at C1D8.

Number of subjects: 50

Statistical analysis:

A sample size of 77 to 90 evaluable patients per arm will achieve 80% power to detect a 20% difference in G3 neutropenia incidence between the 2 arms. The incidence in group cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 q3w is assumed to be 32% and 12% on bi-weekly cabazitaxel arm. The test used is a two-sided Fisher's exact test at 0.05 significance level. Assuming 10% non-evaluable patients, 85 to 100 patients should be included in each arm for a total of 170 to 200.

Patients will be stratified according to G8 score (< 14 vs. ≥ 14), and age (< 70 vs. ≥ 70) before randomization.

Exploratory sub-study The trial is powered on a clinical endpoint, namely to detect a 20% difference in G3 nThe trial is powered on a clinical endpoint, namely to detect a 20% difference in G3 neutropenia incidence between arms (32% in arm A vs 12% arm B; power 80% with two-sided alpha of 5%, correcting for 10% non-evaluable patients (=17 patients).

From the 153 to 180 evaluable patients, we have 76 to 90 patients in each arm, of which we expect 40-60 evaluable patients for translational studies (calculations performed on 25 per arm).

In arm A, we expect 8 patients (32% of patients) with G3 neutropenia, and 17 patients that do not. In arm B, we expect 3 patients (12% of patients) with G3 neutropenia, and 22 patients that do not. For the MDSC analyses, we therefore will be comparing 11 patients with G3 neutropenia to 39 patients.

For all continuous variables, including all immune subpopulations present in blood, mean (sd) will be presented if the distribution seems to be symmetric and in case of a skewed distribution the median and IQR. For categorical data, number and percentage will be presented. For comparison of continuous data linear regression analyses or correlation (Spearman or Pearson) will used. For comparison of continuous data with categorical data logistic regression analysis will be used. For comparison of two sets of categorical data the chi-square test of Fisher's exact test will be utilized. For the radiological PFS analyses the estimates of the hazard ratio and corresponding 95% confidence interval will be tested using a Cox Proportional hazard model. For the overall survival, a stratified log-rank test will be used to compare between groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

196

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Besançon, France, 25030
        • Hôpital Jean Minjoz
      • Bordeaux, France, 33075
        • Hôpital Saint André, CHU de Bordeaux
      • Brest, France, 29229
        • Clinique PASTEUR-CFRO
      • Caen, France, 14000
        • Centre Maurice Tubiana
      • Compiègne, France, 60204
        • Polyclinique Saint-Côme
      • Créteil, France, 94000
        • CHU Henri-Mondor
      • Le Mans, France, 72000
        • Clinique Victor Hugo
      • Lille, France, 59000
        • Centre Oscar Lambret Lille
      • Metz, France, 57045
        • Hopital Belle-Isle
      • Montfermeil, France, 93370
        • GHIRM
      • Nîmes, France, 30029
        • Institut de Cancérologie du Gard - CHU
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou
      • Paris, France, 75679
        • Hopital Cochin
      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
      • Paris, France, 75020
        • Hôpital Universitaire Tenon
      • Poitiers, France, 86021
        • Chu de Poitiers
      • Rouen, France, 76000
        • CHU de Rouen
      • Saint-Mandé, France, 94160
        • HIA Bégin 69 avenue de Paris
      • Saint-brieuc, France, 22015
        • Clinique Armoricaine de Radiologie
      • Sens, France, 89100
        • Centre Hospitalier de Sens
      • Strasbourg, France, 67000
        • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
      • Suresnes, France, 92151
        • Hopital Foch
      • Valenciennes, France, 59300
        • Centre de cancerologie les Dentellieres
      • Bernburg, Germany, 06406
        • Urologisch-onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis
      • Gladbach, Germany, 51465
        • Urologie und Kinderurologie Marienkrankenhaus Bergisch
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
      • Köln, Germany, 50937
        • Uniklinik Köln, Urologie, Uro-Onkologie, spezielle urologische und Roboter-assistierte Chirurgie
      • Magdeburg, Germany, 39104
        • Universitäts-klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie
      • Magdeburg, Germany, 39104
        • Urologische Praxis am Hasselbachplatz
      • Münster, Germany, 48149
        • Universitätsklinikum Münster, Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie,
      • Nürtingen, Germany, 72622
        • Studienpraxis Urologie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

63 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient aged ≥ 65 years with mCRPC previously treated with docetaxel
  2. Medical or surgical castration with castrate level of testosterone (< 50 ng/dl) based on the EAU definition of castrate level of testosterone
  3. Progressive disease according to PCWG2
  4. Histologically proven prostate carcinoma
  5. Health status allowing use of chemotherapy: G8 > 14; or G8 score ≤ 14 with geriatric assessment concluding to reversible impairment allowing use of chemotherapy
  6. ECOG-PS 0, 1 or 2(ECOG-PS 2 should be related to prostate cancer)
  7. Adequate hematologic, liver and renal functions:

    1. Neutrophil count ≥1.5 109/L
    2. Haemoglobin ≥10 g/ dL
    3. Platelet count ≥100.109/L
    4. Total bilirubin ≤ 1 the upper limit of normal (ULN)
    5. Transaminases ≤ 1.5 ULN
    6. Serum creatinine ≤ 2.0 ULN
  8. Ongoing LHRH therapy at study entry
  9. Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of severe hypersensitivity reaction (≥grade 3) to docetaxel
  2. History of severe hypersensitivity reaction (≥grade 3) to polysorbate 80 containing drugs
  3. Uncontrolled severe illness or medical condition (including uncontrolled diabetes mellitus)
  4. Concurrent or planned treatment with strong inhibitors or strong inducers of cytochrome P450 3A4/5 (a one week wash-out period is necessary for patients who are already on these treatments) (see Appendix E)
  5. PS >2 not related to prostate cancer disease
  6. G8 ≤ 14 with geriatric assessment contra-indicating standard cabazitaxel regimen
  7. Concomitant vaccination with yellow fever vaccine
  8. Patient who cannot be regularly followed or cannot answer to quality of life questionnaires because of psychological, social, familial or geographic reasons
  9. Participation in another clinical trial with any investigational drug within 30 days prior to study enrolment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm A

Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m² intravenously over 1 hour on Day 1of a 3-week cycle, plus prednisone (or prednisolone) 10 mg orally given daily for a maximum of 10 cycles (ie 30 weeks of treatment).

Prophylactic Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor G-CSF (Granocyte) will be injected from Day 3 to Day 7 after every administration of cabazitaxel.

  • Arm A : cabazitaxel 25 mg/m² on Day 1 of a 3-week cycle plus daily prednisone or
  • Arm B: cabazitaxel 16 mg/m² on Day 1 and Day 15 of a 4-week cycle plus daily prednisone.
  • Treatment will be continued for a maximum of 10 cycles unless there is documented disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
  • Standard cabazitaxel premedication will be used
Other Names:
  • Jevtana
  • XRP6258
Arm A:plus prednisone 10 mg orally given daily for a maximum of 10 cycles Arm B: plus prednisone 10 mg orally given per day up to 10 cycles
Primary prophylaxis with Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) will be injected from Day 3 to Day 7 after every administration of cabazitaxel
Other Names:
  • Granocyte
Experimental: Arm B
Cabazitaxel 16 mg/m2 on Day 1 and Day 15 of a 4-week cycle plus prednisone (or prednisolone) 10 mg per day up to 10 cycles (ie 40 weeks of treatment). Prophylactic Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor G-CSF (Granocyte) will be injected from Day 3 to Day 7 after every administration of cabazitaxel.
  • Arm A : cabazitaxel 25 mg/m² on Day 1 of a 3-week cycle plus daily prednisone or
  • Arm B: cabazitaxel 16 mg/m² on Day 1 and Day 15 of a 4-week cycle plus daily prednisone.
  • Treatment will be continued for a maximum of 10 cycles unless there is documented disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
  • Standard cabazitaxel premedication will be used
Other Names:
  • Jevtana
  • XRP6258
Arm A:plus prednisone 10 mg orally given daily for a maximum of 10 cycles Arm B: plus prednisone 10 mg orally given per day up to 10 cycles
Primary prophylaxis with Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) will be injected from Day 3 to Day 7 after every administration of cabazitaxel
Other Names:
  • Granocyte

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and/or neutropenic complications
Time Frame: Up to 11 months

To evaluate the incidence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (measured at Day 7 and Day 14) and/or neutropenic complications (febrile neutropenia, neutropenic infection) with two schedules of cabazitaxel (bi-weekly versus tri-weekly) plus prednisone in elderly men (≥ 65 years) with mCRPC previously treated with a docetaxel-containing regimen.

with two schedules of -+cabazitaxel (bi-weekly versus tri-weekly) plus prednisone in elderly men with mCRPC previously treated with a docetaxel-containing regimen

Up to 11 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dose reductions
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 40 weeks
Up to 11 months
through study completion, an average of 40 weeks
Radiological progression-free survival (rPFS)
Time Frame: Up to 11 months
CT-Scan (abdominal/pelvic/chest) or whole body MRI and Bone scan
Up to 11 months
Time to PSA progression
Time Frame: Up to 11 months
Assessed at C1D1, at every each subsequent visit and EOT
Up to 11 months
Time to first symptomatic Skeletal-Related Event (SRE) and incidence of SREs
Time Frame: Up to 11 months
Assessed at C1D1, at every each subsequent visit and EOT
Up to 11 months
Time to opioid treatment (if relevant)
Time Frame: Up to 11 months
Up to 11 months
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate
Time Frame: Up to 11 months
Assessed at C1D1, at every each subsequent visit and EOT
Up to 11 months
Quality of Life (FACT-P)
Time Frame: Up to 11 months
Assessed at C1D1, at every each subsequent visit and EOT
Up to 11 months
Objective response rate (ORR) in measurable lesions (RECIST criteria 1.1 - only on metastasis
Time Frame: Up to 11 months
CT-Scan (abdominal/pelvic/chest) or whole body MRI
Up to 11 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: up to 11 months
up to 11 months
Factors influencing survival
Time Frame: Up to 11 months
Factors influencing survival (duration of response to first ADT, serum testosterone, cumulative dose of cabazitaxel, neutrophils/lymphocytes ratio, Gleason score, G8, grade ≥3 neutropenia)
Up to 11 months
Time to onset of grade ≥3 neutropenia
Time Frame: Up to 11 months
Hematology every week until EOT
Up to 11 months
Grade ≥3 neutropenia duration ( from date of onset of grade ≥ 3 until grade ≤ 2)
Time Frame: Up to 11 months
Hematology every week until EOT
Up to 11 months
Time to onset of grade ≥3 neutropenia by cycle
Time Frame: Up to 11 months
Analysis of grade ≥3 neutropenia and/or neutropenia by cycle
Up to 11 months
Adverse events
Time Frame: Up to 11 months
Up to 11 months
Dose delay
Time Frame: Up to 11 months
Up to 11 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients achieving a best objective response of SD, PR or CR according to RECIST 1.1 specifically comparing those achieving >30% and >50% decrease in MDSC post-induction compared to those who did not achieve this reduction.
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Biomarker analysis
Up to 6 months
Proportion of patients achieving a >50% PSA response at 12 weeks and at any time specifically comparing those achieving >30% and >50% decrease in MDSC post-induction compared to those who did not achieve this reduction.
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Exploratory sub-study: biomarker analysis
Up to 6 months
Radiological progression-free survival (rPFS) according to PCWG2 criteria for all patients, in relation to percentage MDSC change (% maximum change and those achieving >30% and >50% decrease)
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Exploratory sub-study: biomarker analysis
Up to 6 months
Correlations between extent of MDSC (continuous) and NLR decline (continuous)
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Exploratory sub-study: biomarker analysis
Up to 6 months
Differences in peripheral blood immune populations (MDSCs, regulatory T-cells, T-effector and natural killer [NK] cells) with cabazitaxel responsiveness for Q2W and Q3W dosing schedule at week 6 and week 12
Time Frame: Up to 6 months

biomarkers analysis

  1. collection of blood (EDTA tube) at Baseline, C1D8,week 6, week 12 and EOT Collection of blood (RNA Paxgene): baseline
  2. platelet poor plasma isolation, PBMC isolation, PMN isolation and
  3. Flow cytometry assessments and FACS sorting Next-generation targeted sequencing of cfDNA RNA sequencing of baseline PaxGene
Up to 6 months
correlation between MDSC decline (>30% or >50%) with neutropenia (presence or absence)
Time Frame: Up to 6 months

Hematology every week until EOT

  1. collection of blood (EDTA tube) at Baseline, C1D8,week 6, week 12 and EOT Collection of blood (RNA Paxgene): baseline
  2. platelet poor plasma isolation, PBMC isolation, PMN isolation and
  3. Flow cytometry assessments and FACS sorting Next-generation targeted sequencing of cfDNA RNA sequencing of baseline PaxGene
Up to 6 months
Associations between cabazitaxel dose, presence of neutropenia (C1D8), NLR conversion (wk6 and wk12) and MDSC decline (wk6 and wk12)
Time Frame: Up to 6 months

biomarkers analysis

  1. collection of blood (EDTA tube) at Baseline, C1D8,week 6, week 12 and EOT Collection of blood (RNA Paxgene): baseline
  2. platelet poor plasma isolation, PBMC isolation, PMN isolation and
  3. Flow cytometry assessments and FACS sorting Next-generation targeted sequencing of cfDNA RNA sequencing of baseline PaxGene
Up to 6 months
To evaluate changes in peripheral blood immune populations at failure on cabazitaxel, with particular focus on CD38-positive MDSC subsets
Time Frame: Up to 6 months

biomarkers analysis

  1. collection of blood (EDTA tube) at Baseline, C1D8,week 6, week 12 and EOT Collection of blood (RNA Paxgene): baseline
  2. platelet poor plasma isolation, PBMC isolation, PMN isolation and
  3. Flow cytometry assessments and FACS sorting Next-generation targeted sequencing of cfDNA RNA sequencing of baseline PaxGene
Up to 6 months
Associations between baseline MDSC and molecular underpinning (from cfDNA, specifically studying MYCN amplification and PTEN / TP53 aberration)
Time Frame: Up to 6 months

biomarkers analysis

  1. collection of blood (EDTA tube) at Baseline, C1D8,week 6, week 12 and EOT Collection of blood (RNA Paxgene): baseline
  2. platelet poor plasma isolation, PBMC isolation, PMN isolation and
  3. Flow cytometry assessments and FACS sorting Next-generation targeted sequencing of cfDNA RNA sequencing of baseline PaxGene
Up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephane OUDARD, MD, Ph.D, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Oncology Department

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 5, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 2, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 2, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 10, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer Metastatic

Clinical Trials on cabazitaxel

3
Subscribe