Sleep Disorders Prior to and During a Course of Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer (RADIO-SLEEP)

January 13, 2025 updated by: Prof Dirk Rades, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein

Sleep Disorders Prior to and During a Course of Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer and the Potential Impact of Smartphones

The main goal of the study is to evaluate sleep disorders in breast cancer patients prior to and during a course of radiotherapy in terms of severity of sleep disorders, distress for the patients and use of sleeping drugs, in order to evaluate the potential effect of habituation to radiotherapy during the course of treatment and generate hypotheses thereof.

The patients will be asked to complete a questionnaire prior to radiotherapy, after 5 and 15 fractions of radiotherapy, and at the end of radiotherapy. The questionnaire includes questions regarding symptoms, distress, sleep disorders and sleeping drugs. In addition, a questionnaire regarding the use of smartphones / tablets will be completed prior to radiotherapy.

Forty-eight patients with documented start of radiotherapy and with a documented completed questionnaire at baseline and at least one completed questionnaire after start of radiotherapy should be subjected to statistical analysis. Assuming that 5% of patients do not fulfil these requirements, a total of 51 patients should be enrolled to this study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The majority of breast cancer patients receive adjuvant radiotherapy, either following breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy. The situation that a patient needs to be irradiated may cause distress due to a sense of menace in view of the technology, fear of the exposure to radiation and fear of radiation-related adverse effects. These fears and other factors may lead to sleep disorders.

In a previous the study, cancer patients reported the most sleep disorders prior to and at the beginning of radiotherapy. The patients appeared to develop coping strategies during the treatment. In another study, an increase of insomnia was observed during the course of radiotherapy due to treatment-related side effects. In general, very little is known about the prevalence of sleep disorders prior and during a radiotherapy course. This study mainly aims to evaluate the course of sleep disorders during radiotherapy for breast cancer.

To assess the rate of patients with decrease of sleep disorders during the course of radiotherapy compared to baseline, defined as

  • Decrease of severity of sleep disorders by at least 2 points on a patient self-rating scale (0=no problems; 10=maximum problems) or
  • Decrease of distress caused by sleep disorders by at least 2 points on a patient self-rating scale (0=no distress; 10=maximum distress) or
  • Reduction of the dose of sleeping drugs by at least 25%.

The required sample size of N=51 (including drop-outs) is set at the maximum that is deemed achievable in this study within the timeframe of the study given the size of the target population. However, with this sample size a one-sample binomial test with a one-sided significance level of 2.5% has a power of 80% to yield statistical significance if the rate of patients with decrease of sleep disorders during the course of radiotherapy compared to baseline is 25% (rate under the alternative hypothesis) and assuming that a decrease of only 10% or less has to be judged as a random, non-causal change in this uncontrolled study setting (null hypothesis). The latter rate was chosen after respective discussions with experts.

The focus of the statistical analysis is descriptive and exploratory in nature. If statistical tests are applied beyond the prespecified statistical hypothesis testing for the primary study endpoint, they are to be interpreted on an exploratory perspective. All data recorded in the case report forms describing the study population (demographic and clinical characteristics, at baseline) will be analyzed descriptively. Categorical data will be presented in tables with frequencies and percentages. Continuous data will be summarized with at least the following: frequency (n), median, quartiles, mean, standard deviation (standard error), minimum and maximum. Number of patients with protocol deviations during the study and listings describing the deviations will be provided. Sleep disorders at baseline and during the course of radiotherapy will be rated using two patient self-reporting scales (sleep disorders and distress) and the intake of sleeping drugs.

To evaluate the rate of patients with decrease of sleep disorders during the course of radiotherapy compared to baseline, the dichotomized composite endpoint is considered. The point estimate of the rate of decrease and the associated 95% confidence interval will be presented. To test whether the rate of decrease is significantly greater than 10%, the one-sided binomial test at a one-sided 2.5% significance level will be applied.

To further assess the potential impact of other relevant factors on the primary study endpoint stratified analyses will be conducted. The associated factors of particular importance are sleeping disorders at baseline (≤ median score on sleep disorder self-rating scale vs.> median score) and the use of smartphones at bedtime (≤ median score vs. > median score). Furthermore, a logistic regression model including sleep disorder rating scale at baseline (≤ median score on sleep order self-rating scale vs.> median score), the use of smartphones / tablets at bedtime (≤ median score vs. > median score) and other factors, namely age, type of breast surgery, systemic anticancer treatment, body mass index, co-morbidity will be fitted to identify potentially relevant prognostic factors for the decrease of sleep disorders. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence interval (Wald χ2) will be derived thereof.

In addition, each component of the primary composite endpoint will be subjected to statistical analyses to evaluate the sleep disorders during the course of the study using descriptive statistical methods. These analyses allow for detailed assessment of the scales over time taking into account potential decrease as well potential increase in sleep orders. For graphical visualization Spaghetti-plots and Box-Whisker diagrams will be provided. Moreover, the change from baseline values will be considered and subjected to descriptive analyses. Friedman tests and Wilcoxon-Mann Whitney tests may be applied for comparison of study visits. Cumulative distribution plots of changes from baseline at each visit will be presented; these plots will display a continuous change from baseline on the x-axis and the cumulative percentage of patients experiencing that change on the y-axis. The above mentioned analyses will be further stratified by sleeping disorders at baseline (≤ median score on sleep disorder self-rating scale vs.> median score) and the use of smartphones at bedtime (≤ median score vs. > median score). For further exploratory analysis, the rates of patients experiencing any sleep disorders (yes/no) at each time will be estimated together with their associated confidence intervals; these analyses will also be stratified by sleeping disorders at baseline and the use of smartphones at bedtime.

The recruitment of all 51 patients (48 patients plus 5% drop-outs) should be completed within 4.5 months. The radiotherapy period will be 3-6.5 weeks. This equals a total running time for the study of approximately 6 months.The recruitment of all 51 patients (48 patients plus 5% drop-outs) should be completed within 4.5 months. The radiotherapy period will be 3-6.5 weeks. This equals a total running time for the study of approximately 6 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lubeck, Germany, 23562
        • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Female patient with histologically proven breast cancer
  2. Indication for radiotherapy
  3. Sleep disorders (i.e. at least 2 points on the sleep disorder self-rating scale)
  4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 0-2
  5. Age ≥18 years
  6. Written informed consent
  7. Capacity of the patient to contract

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy, Lactation
  2. Expected non-compliance (patient unable to use the seizure diary)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients irradiated for breast cancer
Participants with breast cancer who receive adjuvant radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy.
Participants report the severity of their sleep disorders on a self-rating scale form 0-10 (0=no sleep disorders, 10= maximum sleep disorders).
Participants report their distress caused by sleep disorders on a self-rating scale form 0-10 (0=no distress, 10= maximum distress).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Decreased Sleep Disorders
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Sleep disorders during the course of radiotherapy (assessed after 15 fractions) will be compared to sleep disorders at baseline (prior to radiotherapy).
3 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Decreased Sleep Disorders
Time Frame: 3 - 6.5 weeks
Sleep disorders will be assessed at the end of radiotherapy and compared to baseline.
3 - 6.5 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Dirk Rades, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 16, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 5, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer Female

Clinical Trials on self-rating scale for severity of sleep disorders

Subscribe