Intervention on Development and Growth at Children in Poverty (RAI)

December 7, 2016 updated by: prof. dr. Marita Granitzer, Hasselt University

Developmental and Growth Status of Children (6-60 Months of Age) in Extreme Poverty in Jimma Town of Ethiopia: Effects of Developmental Stimulation - RAI (Risk Analysis and Intervention)

Children in extreme poverty lack adequate care and face increased health risks. The earlier poverty strikes in the developmental process, the more deleterious and long-lasting its effects. There is, however, growing evidence that early interventions can prevent the negative consequences. Such interventions are effective, particularly when they are of high quality, organized at home and parents are involved. Recently, baseline assessment of developmental and nutritional status of SOS children and children in extreme poverty in Jimma region of South-West Ethiopia revealed that these children have developmental problems in language, motor, social-emotional skills and nutritional status. The impact of play-oriented stimulation activities integrated into the existing SOS basic program, on developmental outcomes, has never been investigated in this context. The main objective of the study is, therefore, to evaluate the impact of play-oriented stimulation integrated into the basic SOS program on the developmental outcomes of children living with foster families. This was done by comparing the intervention children with their age-matched children (control), not receiving the stimulation package. It was hypothesized that this package would significantly improve the developmental skills of these children.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ghent, Belgium
        • Ghent University
      • Jimma, Ethiopia
        • 2. Jimma University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 months to 4 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children who were selected by the SOS children's village as lacking parental care and receive basic services;
  • Children living in Jimma town;
  • Children from 3 months to 59 months of age.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with observable physical disabilities which hinders mobility;
  • Children with severe mental retardation;
  • Children with discernable hearing and visual impairments.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: intervention group
Children in the intervention group received basic services such as family-home, food, clothing, health care, protection and education for older children. In addition, there received play-based developmental stimulation integrated into the services.
The age-matched control children received the basic services such as family-home, food, clothing, health care, protection and education. However, they were not provided with the play-based developmental stimulation.
Children in the intervention group received basic services such as family-home, food, clothing, health care, protection and education for older children. In addition, there received play-based developmental stimulation integrated into the services.
Other: control group
The age-matched control children received the basic services such as family-home, food, clothing, health care, protection and education. However, they were not provided with the play-based developmental stimulation.
The age-matched control children received the basic services such as family-home, food, clothing, health care, protection and education. However, they were not provided with the play-based developmental stimulation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Personal-social outcome
Time Frame: baseline
Denver II-Jimma was used to test personal-social outcome and performance ratio was calculated for analysis
baseline
Personal-social outcome
Time Frame: month 3
Denver II-Jimma was used to test personal-social outcome and performance ratio was calculated for analysis
month 3
Personal-social outcome
Time Frame: month 6
Denver II-Jimma was used to test personal-social outcome and performance ratio was calculated for analysis
month 6
fine motor outcome
Time Frame: baseline
Denver II-Jimma was used to test fine motor outcome and performance ratio was calculated for analysis
baseline
fine motor outcome
Time Frame: 3 months
Denver II-Jimma was used to test fine motor outcome and performance ratio was calculated for analysis
3 months
fine motor outcome
Time Frame: 6 months
Denver II-Jimma was used to test fine motor outcome and performance ratio was calculated for analysis
6 months
gross motor outcome
Time Frame: baseline
Denver II-Jimma was used to test gross motor outcome and performance ratio was calculated for analysis
baseline
gross motor outcome
Time Frame: 3 months
Denver II-Jimma was used to test gross motor outcome and performance ratio was calculated for analysis
3 months
gross motor outcome
Time Frame: 6 months
Denver II-Jimma was used to test gross motor outcome and performance ratio was calculated for analysis
6 months
language outcome
Time Frame: baseline
Denver II-Jimma was used to test language outcome and performance ratio was calculated for analysis
baseline
language outcome
Time Frame: 3 months
Denver II-Jimma was used to test language outcome and performance ratio was calculated for analysis
3 months
language outcoome
Time Frame: 6 months
Denver II-Jimma was used to test language outcome and performance ratio was calculated for analysis
6 months
Social-emotional outcome
Time Frame: baseline
Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social Emotional (ASQ: SE) was used to measure social-emotional development of the children
baseline
Social-emotional outcome
Time Frame: 3 months
Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social Emotional (ASQ: SE) was used to measure social-emotional development of the children
3 months
Social-emotional outcome
Time Frame: 6 months
Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social Emotional (ASQ: SE) was used to measure social-emotional development of the children
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
weight
Time Frame: baseline
A child's weight was measured by using a calibrated electronic weighing scale.
baseline
weight
Time Frame: 3 months
A child's weight was measured by using a calibrated electronic weighing scale.
3 months
weight
Time Frame: 6 months
A child's weight was measured by using a calibrated electronic weighing scale.
6 months
Height
Time Frame: baseline
For children under two years of age, a length measuring board on a flat table was used. For children under two years of age, a length measuring board on a flat table was used. The height of a child above two years of age was measured by using a portable stadiometer.
baseline
Height
Time Frame: 3 months
For children under two years of age, a length measuring board on a flat table was used. The height of a child above two years of age was measured by using a portable stadiometer.
3 months
Height
Time Frame: 6 months
For children under two years of age, a length measuring board on a flat table was used. The height of a child above two years of age was measured by using a portable stadiometer.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Teklu Gemechu Abessa, Jimma University
  • Study Chair: Mekitie Wondafrash, nutritionist, Jimma University
  • Study Chair: Patrick Kolsteren, prof.dr, University Ghent
  • Study Chair: Berhanu Nigussie Worku, psychologist, Jimma University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

December 9, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 9, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DGSC-2015

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Child Malnutrition

Clinical Trials on basic services

3
Subscribe