Pacemaker Utilization and Ventricular Pacing in Patients Undergoing Trans-catheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) (PPM in TAVR)

January 19, 2020 updated by: Baylor Research Institute

The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence (at 90-days) of ventricular pacing in patients undergoing permanent pacemaker placement after TAVR.

As well as incidence (at 90-days) of atrioventricular block (AVB), intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD), bundle branch block (BBB), and rate histogram in patients undergoing permanent pacemaker placement after TAVR.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Development of atrioventricular (AV) conduction system abnormalities requiring placement of a permanent pacemaker (PPM) is a known complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Male gender, pre-existing AV conduction system abnormalities, transient AV block intra-procedurally, and use of a self-expanding valve have all been associated with increased risk of AV block and need for permanent pacemaker placement. Persistent AV conduction abnormalities have been documented in approximately 15% of patients who receive an Edwards Sapien valve, with 4% requiring permanent pacemaker placement. 22-28% of patients who receive a CoreValve require permanent pacemaker placement in some studies. In one study, 78% of patients who underwent His bundle electrogram assessment during CoreValve placement had transient or persistent AV conduction system abnormalities during the procedure.

Pacemakers placed at The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano are produced by two manufactures: Medtronic, Inc. and St. Jude Medical, Inc. Each of these manufacturers have pacemakers with algorithms designed to minimize right ventricular pacing. Medtronic's algorithm is referred to as "MVP" (Managed Ventricular Pacing), and St. Jude Medical's algorithm is referred to as "VIP" (Ventricular Intrinsic Preference). Each of these techniques purports to reduce unnecessary right ventricular (RV) pacing through a novel pacemaker algorithm. Both manufacturers' pacemaker programmers and remote monitoring systems allow for demonstration of the percentage of ventricular pacing performed by the device.

The Investigators propose to assess the 90 day- ventricular pacing, atrioventricular block (AVB), intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD), bundle branch block (BBB), and rate histogram incidence in those patients who undergo pacemaker implantation due to elevated risk (or occurrence of) high-grade AV block after TAVR.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Plano, Texas, United States, 75093
        • The Heart Hospital Baylor of Plano

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study cohort will comprise all consecutive patients who undergo permanent pacemaker placement for new conduction disturbances after TAVR at THHBP between 1/1/2015 and 12/31/2016 and will consist of up to 50 patients.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients > 18 years of age
  • Patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
  • Indication for PPM including:

    1. Persistent 3rd degree AVB
    2. Transient 3rd degree AVB
    3. New Left BBB
    4. New bifascicular block
    5. New first degree AV block
    6. Any conduction disturbance determined by the investigator to be related to the TAVR procedure 4. Patients receiving post-TAVR PPM with one of the following devices

    a. Medtronic: i. ADAPTA DR -ADDR01 ii. ADAPTA L DR-ADDRL1 iii. ADVISA MRI-A2DR01 b. St. Jude Medical: i. Zypher 5820 ii. Zypher 5826 iii. Accent pm2110 iv. Accent pm2210 v. Assurity pm2240 vi. Endurity Pm2160

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy-Women of childbearing potential should have negative urine 'pregnancy test prior to enrollment
  • Patients with implanted pacemaker
  • Patients with implantable cardiac defibrillator
  • Indication for post TAVR PPM not related to the procedure including sinus node dysfunction/sick sinus syndrome.
  • Medically unable to provide consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Pacemaker After TAVR
The study cohort will comprise all consecutive patients who undergo permanent pacemaker placement for new conduction disturbances after TAVR at THHBP between 1/1/2015 and 12/31/2016.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Ventricular Pacing
Time Frame: 7-90 days
Incidence of Ventricular pacing post permanent pacemaker placement after TAVR as indicated by Pacemaker interrogation or remote monitoring system.
7-90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of other conduction disturbances
Time Frame: 7-90 days
Freedom from documented atrioventricular block (AVB), intraventricular conduction dely (IVCD), bundle branch block (BBB) as indicated by pacemaker interrogation or remote monitoring system.
7-90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 20, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 20, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 16, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data on the clinical and non-clinical risk factors will be summarized using means, standard deviations (SDs) and percentages. The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to construct a ventricular pacing free curve summarizing time-to ventricular pacing incidence in the study cohort -the competing risk of death will be accounted in the analysis.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrioventricular Block

Clinical Trials on Permanent Pacemaker Placement

3
Subscribe