High-Volume Image-Guided Injection in Chronic Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy (HAT)

August 13, 2019 updated by: A.C. van der Vlist, Erasmus Medical Center

The Value of a High-Volume Image-Guided Injection in Chronic Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy: a Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial

Overuse injury of the Achilles tendon is a common entity in athletes. Currently, the usual treatment for chronic midportion Achilles tendinopathy is an eccentric exercise program. In most cases this gives satisfactory results, however there is a significant group of patients in which the exercise program is not sufficient. Prior to our study, three United Kingdom based studies have investigated the efficacy of High-Volume Image-Guided Injections (HVIGI's) in chronic midportion Achilles tendinopathy. They all showed promising results. However none of these studies had an adequate control group. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial will investigate the value of a High-Volume Image-Guided Injection in chronic midportion Achilles tendinopathy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background of the study - Overuse injury of the Achilles tendon is a common entity in athletes. Especially middle aged athletes are at risk. Elite running athletes have a lifetime risk of sustaining an Achilles tendon injury of 52%. At the moment the usual treatment for chronic midportion Achilles tendinopathy is an excentric exercise program. In most cases this gives great results, however there is a significant group of patients in which the exercise program is not sufficient. Three United Kingdom-based case series evaluated the efficacy of High-Volume Image-Guided Injections (HVIGI's) in chronic midportion Achilles tendinopathy. They all showed promising results. However none of these studies used a comparative group. There is consequently a lack of high-quality studies in this field and therefore the investigators cannot recommend this treatment yet for this indication.

Objective of the study - To investigate the efficacy of a high-volume image guided injection (HVIGI) in chronic midportion Achilles tendinopathy.

Hypothesis - The average VISA-A score is higher in the patient group treated with a progressive exercise program in combination with a high volume image guided injection in comparison with the group treated with low volume injection as a control group in combination with a progressive exercise program.

Study design - A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Randomization and stratification (based on activity level using the Ankle Activity Score) will be performed using a computer-generated model. Measurements will be performed at baseline, 2, 6, 12 and 24 weeks post injection. At every time point both the primary and secondary outcome measurements will be collected. The painDETECT and the Pain Coping Inventory questionnaires will be derived at baseline and 24 week post injection.

Study population - In total, 80 patients with clinically diagnosed chronic midportion Achilles tendinopathy will be included in this study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • Erasmus MC University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18-70 years.
  2. Clinical diagnosis of chronic midportion Achilles tendinopathy: Painful swelling of the Achilles tendon, 2-7 cm proximal to it's calcaneal insertion.
  3. Non-response to exercise program for 6 weeks.
  4. Painful Achilles tendon for more than 2 months.
  5. Neovascularisation is present on Power Doppler Ultrasonography examination

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinical suspicion of insertional disorders (pain at the site of the insertion of the Achilles tendon on the calcaneum)
  2. Clinical suspicion of an Achilles tendon rupture (Thompson test abnormal and palpable "gap")
  3. Clinical suspicion of plantar flexor tenosynovitis (posteromedial pain when the toes are plantar flexed against resistance)
  4. Clinical suspicion of n.suralis pathology (sensitive disorder in the area of the sural nerve)
  5. Clinical suspicion of peroneal subluxation (visible luxation of the mm. Peronea spot in combination with localized pain)
  6. Suspicion of internal disorders: spondylarthropathy, gout, hyperlipidemia, Rheumatoid Arthritis and sarcoidosis.
  7. Condition that prevents the patients from executing an active exercise program
  8. Recently prescribed drugs (within 2 years) with a putative effect on symptoms and tendon healing (quinolone antibiotics, corticosteroids).
  9. Previous Achilles tendon rupture.
  10. Patient has received surgical intervention for his injury.
  11. Patient does not wish, for whatever reason, to undergo one of the two treatments
  12. A medical condition that would affect safety of injection (e.g. peripheral vascular disease, use of anticoagulant medication)
  13. Known presence of a pregnancy
  14. Condition of the Achilles tendon caused by medications (arising in relation to moment of intake), such as quinolones and statins
  15. Inability to give informed consent.
  16. Participation in other concomitant treatment programs.
  17. Patient has already one side included in this study.
  18. Allergy for lidocain.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High-Volume Image-Guided Injection
HVIGI: Injection of 50 cc ( 40 cc 0,9% sodium chloride solution + 10 cc 1% lidocain) in combination with a progressive exercise program and gradual return to sports activities.
High Volume Image-Guided Injection with a saline/lidocain solution
Other Names:
  • Saline 0.9% 40 ml
  • Lidocain 1.0% 10 ml
A 12-week during progressive exercise training program consisting of isometric, isotonic and eccentric calf exercises.
Placebo Comparator: Low-Volume Image-Guided Injection
LVIGI: Injection of 2 cc (1.6 cc 0.9% Sodium chloride solution + 0.4 cc 1% lidocain) in combination with a progressive exercise program and gradual return to sports activities.
A 12-week during progressive exercise training program consisting of isometric, isotonic and eccentric calf exercises.
Placebo control with injection of a saline/lidocain solution (low volume)
Other Names:
  • Saline 0.9% 1.6 ml
  • Lidocain 1.0% 0.4 ml

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles questionnaire (VISA-A)
Time Frame: Change in VISA-A score at 24 weeks
Change in VISA-A score at 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain detect questionnaire (PD-Q)
Time Frame: Change in pain detect score at 24 weeks
Change in pain detect score at 24 weeks
The Pain Coping Inventory (PCI)
Time Frame: Change in PCI score at 24 weeks
Change in PCI score at 24 weeks
10 hop test
Time Frame: Change in visual analogue scale score following a 10 hop test at 24 weeks
Change in visual analogue scale score following a 10 hop test at 24 weeks
Flexibility m. gastrocnemius using a goniometer
Time Frame: Change in flexibility of the gastrocnemius muscle at 24 weeks
Change in flexibility of the gastrocnemius muscle at 24 weeks
Flexibility m. soleus using a goniometer
Time Frame: Change in flexibility of the soleus muscle at 24 weeks
Change in flexibility of the soleus muscle at 24 weeks
Power m. gastrocnemius using a hand-held dynamometer
Time Frame: Change in power of the gastrocnemius muscle at 24 weeks
Change in power of the gastrocnemius muscle at 24 weeks
Power m. soleus using a hand-held dynamometer
Time Frame: Change in power of the soleus muscle at 24 weeks
Change in power of the soleus muscle at 24 weeks
Degree of neovascularisation (determined with standardized Power Doppler Ultrasonography examination)
Time Frame: Change in degree of neovascularization at 24 weeks
Ultrasonography examination before and after eccentric/isotonic calf exercises or rest
Change in degree of neovascularization at 24 weeks
Return to sports using a standardized weekly questionnaire
Time Frame: Change in return to sport at 24 weeks
Change in return to sport at 24 weeks
Compliance to the exercise program and return to sports activity program using a standardized weekly questionnaire assessing the percentage of exercises that is performed
Time Frame: Change in compliance at 24 weeks
Change in compliance at 24 weeks
Patient satisfaction with treatment results
Time Frame: Change at 24 weeks
Change at 24 weeks
Patient Acceptable Symptom Scale (PASS)
Time Frame: Change at 24 weeks
Change at 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: R.J. de Vos, PhD, Erasmus MC University Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

December 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe