Telemedical, Intersectoral Network as New Digital Health Structure to Measurably Improve the Local Health Care (TELnet@NRW)

June 1, 2020 updated by: RWTH Aachen University
Telemedicine allows providing expert know-ledge from specialized health centers to regional hospitals and practices. In this multicenter, prospective, non-interventional study hospitals and practices in NRW are supplied via a telematics platform with expertise from the university hospitals RWTH Aachen and Münster. The communication occurs via highly encrypted audio/video conference systems and a certified data exchange platform "Fallakte+". In total 40.000 outpatient and stationary patients with infectious diseases or need for intensive care should be treated with telemedical support. The participating hospitals and practices are randomly distributed into four clusters. The clusters are supplied with telemedicine at different time points but all clusters start at the same time collecting data from patient cohorts of infectiology and intensive care (e.g. symptom, therapeutic progress and outcome). The collected data is later compared to data obtained in the same way from patients treated with telemedical support and evaluated regarding differences in the quality of treatment, therapeutic process and the satisfaction of the patients with telemedicine. The aim is to improve the treatment quality in regional hospitals and practices of patients with serious and complex diseases and bring forward the application of telemedicine.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In future time the number of old people will significantly increase in Germany because of the demographic change taking place. The health care of the large number of old people will probably lead to a lack of physicians and an inefficient health care system. One strategy to tackle the problem could be telemedicine. Telemedicine makes it possible to provide know-ledge from experts to local hospitals and practices which otherwise need to send patients with serious and complex diseases to specialized trans-regional health centers. In this multicenter, prospective, non-interventional study hospitals and practices in NRW are supplied via a telematics platform with expert know-ledge from the university hospitals RWTH Aachen and Münster. The communication occurs via highly encrypted audio/video conference systems and a certified data exchange platform "Fallakte+".

In total 40.000 outpatient and stationary patients should be treated with telemedical support. Registered doctors will be involved in already existing practice networks to evaluate the potential for transfer and to ensure the sharing of know-ledge beyond the borders of individual sectors. The aim of the study is to improve the treatment quality of regional hospitals and practices and to increase the efficiency of the care of relevant patient cohort in the field of infectiology and intensive care with the main focus sepsis as those patient groups especially often require professional expertise for a successful therapy.

In the beginning of the study participating hospitals and practices are randomly distributed into four clusters (cluster randomization). The different clusters all start with the control phase but enter into the intervention phase at different times (stepped-wedge design). During the control phase data of patients with infection and intensive care patients routinely treated without the support of telemedicine are documented and the patients are asked to complete a questionnaire regarding health-related quality of life (SF36) directly after treatment and at two time points in the follow-up. The collected data will be later compared to data obtained in the same way from patients treated with telemedical support and evaluated regarding differences in the quality of treatment, therapeutic process and the satisfaction of the patients with telemedicine.

If the study shows that the treatment quality and therapeutic process of patients with infectious diseases or need for intensive care is improved by telemedicine, the telematics platform can be expanded and used by other specialized fields and users in future time.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

159065

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Münster, Germany
        • University Hospital Münster
    • NRW
      • Aachen, NRW, Germany, 52074
        • University Hospital RWTH Aachen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • majority
  • written informed consent
  • infectiological and/or intensive care treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • minority
  • absence of written informed consent in the case of non-acute life-threatening disease
  • persons who have a dependency or employment relationship with the sponsor or investigator
  • persons who are sheltered in an institution upon court or administrative order

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Patients of this group are routinely treated without telemedical support.
Active Comparator: Telemedical support
Patients of this group are routinely treated with telemedical support.
Participating sites will be advised by telemedicine support.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of treatment quality
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
The level of implementation of the 10 recommendations of the German Society of Infectious Diseases (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Infektiologie, DGI) within the framework of the Initiative "Decide wisely" ("Klug entscheiden").
through study completion, an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of sepsis diagnosis
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Rate of sepsis diagnosis
through study completion, an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Rate of ARDS Diagnosis
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Rate of ARDS Diagnosis
through study completion, an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Sepsis therapy in compliance with guidelines
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Sepsis therapy in compliance with guidelines through for instance timely administration of antibiotics within 3 h and reduction of sepsis mortality.
through study completion, an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Rate of ARDS therapy according to guidelines
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year

Measured against the evident ventilation targets, Ventilation with low ventilation volumes and low peak pressures: with controlled ventilation:

Breath volume of 6 ml/kg calculated Body ideal weight, PEEP setting in proportion with the necessary FiO2, plateau pressure < 30 cm H2O

through study completion, an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Rate of inadequate antibiotic therapies
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Measured by the Percentage of postoperatively continued perioperative Antibiotic prophylaxis
through study completion, an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Rate of patients with dialysis
Time Frame: At discharge from Intensive Care Unit (study completion); after an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Rate of patients with dialysis requiring Kidney insufficiency in discharge from the Intensive care
At discharge from Intensive Care Unit (study completion); after an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Rate of transfer transport
Time Frame: At discharge from Intensive Care Unit (study completion); after an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Rate of transfer transport
At discharge from Intensive Care Unit (study completion); after an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Health-related quality of life (SF36-Questionnaire)
Time Frame: At discharge from Intensive Care Unit (through study completion; an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year), through study completion, an average of 12 months and 24 months after discharge of ICU
Clinical studies 36-item Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey An instrument used to assess multidimensional health-related QOL, which measures 8 health related parameters: physical function, social function, physical role, emotional role, mental health, energy, pain, general health perceptions; each parameter is scored from 0 to 100 Managed care 36-Item Short-Form Functional and Perceived Health Status Survey A questionnaire which measures health status; the SF-36 also includes a list of 18 self-reported chronic conditions
At discharge from Intensive Care Unit (through study completion; an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year), through study completion, an average of 12 months and 24 months after discharge of ICU
Rate of non-diagnosed sepsis
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Defined as no filled out sepsis bundle despite presence of sepsis symptoms
through study completion, an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Sepsis mortality rate
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Sepsis mortality rate
through study completion, an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Hospital mortality rate
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Hospital mortality rate
through study completion, an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Length of stay in intensive care unit
Time Frame: At discharge from Intensive Care Unit (study completion); after an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Length of stay in intensive care unit measured in hours
At discharge from Intensive Care Unit (study completion); after an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Hospital stay
Time Frame: At discharge from Hospital; after an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year
Hospital stay measured in days
At discharge from Hospital; after an average of 30 days up to a maximum of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gernot Marx, Univ.-Prof. Dr. med., Clinic for Operative Intensive Care and Intermediate Care, University Hospital RWTH Aachen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16-162

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infection

Clinical Trials on Telemedical support

3
Subscribe