Telemedical vs. Conventional Prehospital Care in Acute Coronary Syndromes

April 24, 2017 updated by: RWTH Aachen University

Quality Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndromes Between Telemedically Supported Paramedics and Conventional On-scene Physician Care

Telemedically supported paramedic care of acute coronary syndromes was compared to a historical control period of solely conventional on-scene physician care. Quality outcomes based on current guidelines were researched als well as time requirements in both groups.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Telemedically supported paramedic care of acute coronary syndromes was compared to a historical control period of solely conventional on-scene physician care. Quality outcomes based on current guidelines were researched als well as time requirements in both groups. All data was collected prospectively for quality management purposes and analyzed retrospectively after ethical approval by the local ethics committee.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

221

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aachen, Germany, 52074
        • University Hospital Aachen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who called the emergency medical service and the paramedics suspect acute coronary syndrome.

Description

Inclusion Criteria: symptoms of acute coronary syndrome -

Exclusion Criteria: secondary transfers from hospital to hospital, traumatic chest pain

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Telemedicine group
Telemedical care of acute coronary syndromes in the prehospital phase. Paramedics were supported by a physician in a tele consultation centre.
Telemedical support by a physician in a telemedicine centre
Control group
Conventional on-scene care of acute coronary syndromes by a physician. No telemedicine system was available during this control period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: prehospital phase (0.5-2 hours)
respiratory / circulatory insufficiency, allergic reaction, cardiac arrest
prehospital phase (0.5-2 hours)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correct use of Aspirin
Time Frame: prehospital phase (0.5-2 hours)
Correct use of Aspirin based on current guidelines
prehospital phase (0.5-2 hours)
Correct use of unfractionated Heparin (UFH)
Time Frame: prehospital phase (0.5-2 hours)
Correct use of UFH based on current guidelines
prehospital phase (0.5-2 hours)
Correct use of Morphine
Time Frame: prehospital phase (0.5-2 hours)
Correct use of Morphine based on current guidelines
prehospital phase (0.5-2 hours)
Use of 12-lead-ECG
Time Frame: prehospital phase (0.5-2 hours)
Use of 12-lead-ECG after first medical contact
prehospital phase (0.5-2 hours)
Correct transport destination
Time Frame: prehospital phase (0.5-2 hours)
hospital with cath lab in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or high-risk Non-STEMI-ACS
prehospital phase (0.5-2 hours)
Correct use of oxygen
Time Frame: prehospital phase (0.5-2 hours)
Correct use of Morphine based on current guidelines
prehospital phase (0.5-2 hours)
Correct use of Glyceroltrinitrate
Time Frame: prehospital phase (0.5-2 hours)
Correct use of Glyceroltrinitrate based on current guidelines
prehospital phase (0.5-2 hours)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Coronary Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Telemedical support

3
Subscribe