Efficacy and Safety of Upfront Combination of ΒΟsentan and ΤΑdalafil in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (BOTA-PAH)

January 24, 2018 updated by: Elpen Pharmaceutical Co. Inc.

An Observational, Non-interventional, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Upfront Combination of Bosentan and Tadalafil in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Greek Patients

The development of disease-targeted drugs for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has significantly improved within the last years. Combining drug products with different mechanisms of action such as Endothelin-Receptor-Antagonists (ERAs) and Phosphodiesterase-Type-5-inhibitors (PDE-5-Inhibitors) has become increasingly important for the treatment of PAH. Recently, the results of the AMBITION study reported that an upfront combination treatment of ambrisentan and tadalafil immediately after diagnosis leads to a delayed disease progression. On the other hand, the sequential combination of bosentan and sildenafil did not show a similar positive clinical effect and this was attributed to a negative clinically relevant pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction. Although, recent guidelines have extrapolated that initial upfront combination treatment follows a class effect in terms of efficacy and safety, there is an imperative need to support this notion with other combinations of ERAs and PDE-5-Inhibitors.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Detailed Description

The primary objective of BOTA study is to compare the change in clinical and hemodynamic measures of PAH after the initiation of first line combination therapy with bosentan and tadalafil in adult patients with PAH. The safety and tolerability of first line combination therapy will also be evaluated.

In patients with PAH initial upfront combination treatment with bosentan and tadalafil

  1. Improves

    • Exercise capacity as expressed by distance walked in six minute walk test and WHO functional class
    • Hemodynamics in terms of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) reduction and cardiac index (CI) elevation
    • Quality of life
    • NTproBNP serum levels
    • Echocardiographic prognostic parameters such as right atrial area and presence of pericardial effusion.
  2. Is safe as assessed by

    • Liver function markers such as serum SGOT and SGPT levels
    • Hemoglobin levels

Study Type

Observational

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Newly diagnosed patients with PAH

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Male or females between 18 to 75 years of age at inclusion

Diagnosis of PAH due to the following:

  • Idiopathic Primary Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (IPAH)
  • Hereditary PAH
  • PAH secondary to connective tissue disease
  • PAH diagnosis confirmed by right heart catheterization performed within 3 months prior to study enrolment Subjects must weigh at least 40 kg at inclusion Subject must have a current diagnosis of being in World Health Organisation (WHO) Functional Class II or III.

Treatment PAH naïve subjects PAH documented by

  • mPAP ≥25mmHg,
  • pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) or
  • left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) ≤15mmHg and
  • PVR ≥3 Wood Units. Subject must walk a distance of ≥125m and ≤500m at the screening visit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of pulmonary embolism
  • No prior treatment with PDE-5 inhibitors
  • History of chronic lung disease / restrictive lung disease (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or scleroderma) with impairment of lung function
  • Current treatment with nitrates or nitric oxide
  • Significant (ie, >2+) valvular disease other than tricuspid regurgitation or pulmonary regurgitation
  • History of cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest, hemodynamic collapse, CPR, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or uncontrolled atrial fibrillation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in the N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide at Month 6
Time Frame: 6 months
N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) is a surrogate marker of heart failure. The geometric mean ratio will be calculated as the ratio between the month 6 value and the Baseline value and presented as percent change = 100 * (geometric mean ratio - 1). The Baseline value is the last value prior to administration of study drug; this may be prior to or on the day of study drug initiation.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event
Time Frame: 6 months
Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Clinical Response
6 months
Time to first clinical worsening (TTCW) event
Time Frame: 6 months
TTCW defined as the number of days between first dose of study drug and the occurrence of a predefined clinical worsening event.
6 months
Percentage of Participants With a Satisfactory Clinical Response at Month 6
Time Frame: 6 months
A satisfactory clinical response at month 6 is defined as a participant who meets all of the following criteria: 10% improvement in 6MWD compared with Baseline;
6 months
Change From Baseline in the World Health Organization Functional Class at month 6
Time Frame: 6 months
Change From Baseline in the World Health Organization Functional Class Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 The WHO Functional Class (FC) indicates the severity of PAH and is an adaptation of the New York Heart Association classification.
6 months
Change From Baseline in the 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) Test at month 6
Time Frame: 6 months

Change From Baseline in the 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) Test at month 6

MWD is the distance a participant can walk in 6 minutes. The 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) test measures the distance that a participant can walk in a period of 6 minutes.

6 months
Change From Baseline in Borg Dyspnea Index at month 6
Time Frame: 6 months
Borg Dyspnea Index (BDI) indicates the degree of breathlessness after completion of the 6 minute walk test.
6 months
Quality of Life
Time Frame: 6 moths
Change in emPHasis-10 questionnaire score
6 moths

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Hypertension

3
Subscribe