Empirical ANtibiotic THErapy in Adults Hospitalised With Malaria (ANTHEM)

March 12, 2024 updated by: Menzies School of Health Research

An Observational Trial of Empirical Antibiotic Therapy in Adults Hospitalised With Malaria

While World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines recommend empirical antibacterial therapy as the standard of care in all African children with severe falciparum malaria, there are fewer data to guide the management of adults with the disease in low transmission settings.

Presently WHO guidelines do not recommend empirical antibacterial therapy in adults with malaria in low transmission settings, instead antibacterial therapy is only clearly recommended in those patients in whom a serious bacterial co-infection is clinically suspected. However, in a pilot study in Myanmar (High Frequency of Clinically Significant Bacteremia in Adults Hospitalized With Falciparum Malaria PMID: 26989752) we found that 13% of adults hospitalized with falciparum malaria were bacteremic, with bacterial co-infection suspected by clinicians in the minority. Patients with serious bacterial infection are commonly not bacteraemic and so this probably underestimates the frequency of significant bacterial co-infection.

In that pilot study, over 75% of patients received empirical antibacterial therapy on admission to hospital, which would not accord with published WHO guidelines as clinicians suspected bacterial co-infection in only 17%. However, the study's 100% survival rate - when over half of the patients were at high risk of death - suggests that the administration of antibacterial therapy may be appropriate until bacterial co-infection is excluded.

There is also academic debate about the role of co-morbidities in the presentation of patients severely ill with vivax malaria. Bacterial co-infection has been reported in some - but by no means all - studies of severe vivax infection. It would be useful to determine the relative contribution of bacterial co-infection to the clinical presentation of patients with vivax malaria.

By systematically seeking evidence of bacterial co-infection in all patients hospitalized at the study sites, this study aims to determine if the bacterial infection is really as prevalent as was the case in the pilot study. Accordingly it aims to determine the utility of a strategy that includes empirical antibacterial therapy in adults hospitalized with malaria in low transmission settings, until significant bactrila infection has been excluded.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The study's participants will be adults hospitalized with malaria at four tertiary referral hospitals in Myanmar. The study will be a collaboration between clinicians at Insein General Hospital North Okkalapa General Hospital and Thingangyun General Hospital in Yangon and Naypyidaw General Hospital in Naypyidaw, Myanmar and the Department of Global Health at Menzies School of Health Research.

The study's participants will be cared for by local doctors and nurses according to current WHO guidelines for the management of severe malaria. Management will include a systematic screen for bacterial infection with a detailed history, examination, radiological and laboratory studies, including the collection of blood cultures in all patients (this is recommended in WHO guidelines, but rarely performed in the resource poor setting). The only difference to the current WHO guidelines for the management of severe malaria will be the administration of empirical antibacterial therapy to all participants with falciparum malaria on admission. Participants with vivax malaria - who have a much lower incidence of complicated disease - would be managed according to the existing WHO guidelines, which suggest that antibacterial therapy should only be commenced in the presence of convincing evidence of severe bacterial co-infection.

After informed consent is obtained, artesunate is administered and a detailed work up for bacterial co-infection is performed, all participants with falciparum malaria will receive empiric levofloxacin. This will continue until 48 hours when, if the patient is improving and the work up for infection is negative, antibiotics will be ceased. Conversely if cultures are positive, targeted antibacterial therapy will be commenced as soon as sensitivity data are available. In the setting of convincing clinical evidence of bacterial infection when cultures are negative (a patient with a chest x-ray consistent with pneumonia but in whom cultures are negative for example), appropriate antibacterial will be continued. Participants who deteriorate in the first 48 hours will have their antibacterial therapy escalated to vancomycin and meropenem (based on microbiological findings in our pilot study).

Participants hospitalized with vivax malaria will also receive parenteral antimalarial therapy and have a detailed work up for infection, but empirical antibacterial therapy will not be commenced. Study clinicians may start antibacterial therapy in the setting of positive cultures or unequivocal evidence of bacterial infection if cultures are negative.

The subsequent clinical course of the participants and the frequency of confirmed bacterial co-infection would be compared to historical controls at the study sites to determine the utility of empirical antibacterial therapy in adults hospitalized with malaria in Myanmar. These data would be generalizable to other low transmission settings potentially.

The plan is to continue the study for 3 years; we expect that this will allow sufficient time to enrol enough patients to answer the study questions. The data will be analysed annually by independent safety monitors (from the University of Medicine 2, Myanmar and The Kirby Institute, Australia) and the study terminated if clear benefit or harm is identified. Independent safety monitors will also follow the study locally, review all deaths and be available to address any concerns of the participants and their families.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Yangon, Myanmar
        • Insein General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults hospitalized with malaria at the four study sites

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admitted to hospital
  • Positive film for asexual forms Plasmodium falciparum or Plasmodium vivax or positive Rapid Diagnostic Test for either pathogen if blood film not immediately available (with confirmation on blood film as soon as possible).
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 16
  • Pregnancy
  • Patient's family declines consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients with falciparum malaria

Empirical antibiotic therapy with levofloxacin 750mg daily for 48 hours. This will be ceased if there is no laboratory or radiological evidence of infection at 48 hours.Therapy will be modified based on culture results or clinical judgment if cultures are not available.

If patients deteriorate in the first 48 hours on levofloxacin, antibacterial therapy comprising vancomycin (1.5g bd) and meropenem (1g tds) will be substituted for levofloxacin in addition to increasing supportive care as appropriate.

The dosing of all antibiotics will be adjusted according to creatinine clearance.

Patients with vivax malaria
No empirical therapy will be commenced in these patients. If there is laboratory or radiological evidence of infection antibacterial therapy will be administered based on culture results or clinical judgment if cultures are not available.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival
Time Frame: Within 30 days of enrolment
Death before discharge from hospitalization
Within 30 days of enrolment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Supportive care requirement
Time Frame: Within 30 days of enrolment
A requirement for supportive care as determined by the attending clinician. Supportive care is defined as a requirement renal replacement therapy (clinical symptoms of acute renal failure), vasopressor support (mean arterial blood pressure of less than 65mmHg despite fluid resuscitation), blood transfusion (haemoglobin < 7 g/dL) or mechanical ventilation (due to type 1 or type 2 respiratory failure)
Within 30 days of enrolment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mar Mar Kyi, MD, University of Medicine 2, Yangon, Myanmar

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data will be stored for a period of five years after any resulting publication. Researchers who apply and receive approval from the Human Research Ethics Committees of the Menzies School of Health Research and the University of Medicine 2, Yangon will be able to review the data.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be available from October 2016 for 5 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers who apply and receive approval from the Human Research Ethics Committees of the Menzies School of Health Research and the University of Medicine 2, Yangon will be able to review the data.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • CSR

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

3
Subscribe