Interrupting Prolonged Sitting With Activity (InPACT)

August 16, 2017 updated by: Rebecca Hasson, University of Michigan

Interrupting Prolonged Sitting With Activity Feasibility Study

This study tested the feasibility of interrupting prolonged sitting with 10, 3-minute activity breaks in elementary school classrooms. Three elementary schools in Southeast Michigan (20 teachers, 500 students) participated in this study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

School environments have historically provided many opportunities for children to be physically active through comprehensive programs, including recess, intramural physical activity clubs, interscholastic sports and physical education. However, with recent cuts to public school funding and an increased emphasis on standardized test scores, schools districts across the country have reduced time allocated for structured physical activity in favor of additional academic instruction time. This is troubling as uninterrupted prolonged sitting time is associated with increased disruptive behavior, lower academic achievement and increased obesity risk in children. As such, developing low-cost, innovative physical activity interventions aimed at improving weight outcomes and cognitive function in children are warranted.

Researchers have targeted the school classroom, where students spend the majority of their time, as a potential intervention site. Classroom-based physical activity interventions have been largely successful at increasing physical activity, improving physical fitness and academic achievement among children. Yet, no intervention to date has been able to produce significant improvements in weight status, in part due to the intensity, duration and frequency of activities employed (i.e., low-to-moderate intensity; 10-30 minutes per session; 1-2 sessions per day). Preliminary evidence from our laboratory suggests intermittent activity breaks performed at a moderate-to-vigorous intensity elicits greater total daily physical activity energy expenditure without subsequent increases in food intake compared to lower intensity activities. Other researchers have confirmed greater reductions in weight and fat mass in response to higher rather than lower intensity physical activities. In addition, short bursts of activity rather than continuous movements more closely mimics children's natural activity patterns in free-living environments. Hence, incorporating intermittent activity breaks of moderate-to-vigorous intensity as an intervention component may increase the likelihood of classroom-based physical activity interventions improving weight outcomes in children.

Implementing intermittent activity breaks in a classroom will require adjustments to both teaching curricula and classroom design. Current teaching curricula promotes sedentary behaviors by requiring children to spend between 6 and 8 hours in seated academic instruction per day. Moreover, current classroom designs (i.e., size of the classroom and interior areas, type of furniture, flooring and room arrangement) optimize student learning and classroom management with little consideration given to physical activity and movement. Yet, simple adjustments to teaching curricula (i.e. coupling physical activity with teacher's existing lessons) and classroom design (e.g. using smart floor planning to restructure spaces in a classroom) can dramatically increase movement and subsequent learning within that space. In partnership with the School of Education and the Taubman College of Architecture & Urban Planning, two traditionally non-health related fields, the overall objectives of this pilot study are to: 1) develop a classroom curriculum and floor plan that promotes movement, learning and positive behavioral outcomes; and 2) test the feasibility of implementing our classroom-based physical activity intervention (Interrupting Prolonged sitting with ACTivity or INPACT) in three elementary schools (20 classrooms) across the state of Michigan. Third thru fifth grade teachers and students from Columbia Elementary, Estabrook Elementary and Anderson Elementary will be recruited to participate in this pilot study with classroom teachers delivering the physical activity intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • Childhood Disparities Research Laboratory

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 3rd thru 6th grade students in participating InPACT classrooms

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N/A

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active classroom
Twenty elementary school teachers implemented 10, 3-minute moderate-to-vigorous physical activity breaks (50-75% of heart rate maximum), 5 days per week in their classrooms over a 16-week period.
30 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
Other Names:
  • InPACT classroom

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (student)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Direct observation via the System for Observing Play and Leisure Activity in Youth (SOPLAY) was used to assess student physical activity intensity and physical activity minutes completed in the classroom.
16 weeks
Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (teacher)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Direct observation via the System for Observing Play and Leisure Activity in Youth (SOPLAY) was used to assess teacher physical activity intensity and physical activity minutes completed in the classroom.
16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Transition time
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Transition time was assessed via direct observation and was calculated as the amount of time from when the teacher completed instructions to his/her class to prepare for an activity break to when students started engaging in the activity break.
16 weeks
Time-on-task
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Time-on-task was assessed via direct observation and was calculated as the percent of students following the directions of the teacher 30 seconds post activity break.
16 weeks
Physical activity enjoyment
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Teachers distributed the revised Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) to their students to assess enjoyment of participating in the activity breaks.
16 weeks
Physical activity confidence
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Teachers distributed a single-item question from the Physical Activity Self-Efficacy Scale (PASES) to measure physical activity confidence.
16 weeks
Physical activity heart rate
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Heart rate during physical activity breaks in the classroom was assessed via heart rate monitoring.
16 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rebecca E Hasson, PhD, University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUM00117049

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physical Activity

Clinical Trials on Active classroom

3
Subscribe