- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02225236
Improving Self-regulation & School Readiness in Preschoolers
January 25, 2018 updated by: Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
This project will develop and evaluate the initial effectiveness of an intervention training executive functioning, metacognition, and self-regulation in preschoolers attending certain high poverty Cincinnati preschools.
Studies show that these skills are critical for school performance, and that children with better executive functioning have better long term outcomes.
It is also important to intervene early when children are most likely to profit because their brains are rapidly developing.
There are some promising programs targeting these skills in preschoolers, but few are available to teachers for implementation in the classroom setting.
The specific aims of this study are: 1) to adapt a promising clinic-based program for the preschool classroom environment, and 2) to test the feasibility and initial impact of the adapted program on executive functioning and school readiness in schools with a high proportion of children from low income families.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
We propose to translate a promising intervention, Executive-function Training for Attention and Metacognition (ETAM), originally developed for use in a clinic setting, to be delivered in the school setting, ultimately by teachers.
Specifically, we propose to develop a curriculum that can be added to the classroom curriculum which will target the development of self-regulation and metacognition in preschoolers.
Thus the purpose of the study is to 1) develop a teacher training program based on the principles we have found to be effective in a parent-based intervention and 2) test the feasibility and initial efficacy (i.e., reduced disruptive behaviors and increased school readiness) of the program in children from low income families.
We will randomly assign 6 preschools to receive the teacher training component and 6 schools to serve as a control group (i.e., will not receive the intervention).
We will conduct assessments on all preschoolers in the classroom prior to delivering the teacher training (i.e., beginning of the school year), provide the training to preschoolers in classrooms randomized to the active intervention group, and then conduct assessments at the end of the school year.
Our primary aims are to assess the feasibility of a program designed to train teachers to incorporate the principles of the training program into the daily classroom environment, and to assess whether the program improves executive functioning and functional outcomes [i.e., Attention/Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms, academic readiness, social competence], as compared to outcomes of children in the control schools.
Although study personnel will be responsible for delivery of the intervention, preschool teachers will be closely involved in the process to provide ongoing feedback regarding the study intervention.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
237
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
- Schools in the Archdiocese of Cincinnati to be determined
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
3 years to 5 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
All children in preschool classrooms in selected schools.
Exclusion Criteria:
None
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Classroom Intervention
The intervention focuses on training executive functioning (e.g., working memory and inhibition) and metacognition (i.e., the ability to predict, check, monitor, coordinate and control cognitive operations) using play activities and structured language and reinforcement.
|
|
|
No Intervention: No treatment control
No intervention
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Preschool Version
Time Frame: Outcome assessment (~9 months after initial assessment)
|
Parents and teachers will complete this rating scale assessing executive function behaviors in the home and school environments, yielding T-scores on several subscales, including Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Inhibitory Self-Control Index, Flexibility Index, Emergent Metacognition Index, and a Global Executive Composite.
The scale has adequate reliability and validity as assessed in two- to five-year-olds
|
Outcome assessment (~9 months after initial assessment)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals - Preschool, Second Edition - Concepts and Following Directions
Time Frame: Outcome evaluation (~9 months after baseline evaluation)
|
The Concepts and Following Directions subtest is a measure of auditory and visual attention.
This subtest requires the child to interpret, recall, and execute oral commands of increasing length and complexity that contain concepts of functional language.
A subscale score is computed for Concepts and Following Directions.
Across ages (i.e., 3- to 7-year-olds), internal consistency ranged from .78 to .85 with an average of .82.
|
Outcome evaluation (~9 months after baseline evaluation)
|
|
NEPSY- Attention/Executive Function subtests
Time Frame: Outcome (~9 months after baseline evaluation)
|
The Visual Attention subtest is a measure of inhibition, scanning, vigilance, and impulsivity.
This subtest is divided into two tasks (e.g., cats and faces, or bunnies and cats).
The child is shown an exemplar at the top of the page (e.g., bunny) and is asked to circle all the bunnies amongst a number of other stimuli on the rest of the page as quickly as possible.
The Statue subtest is a measure of motor persistence and inhibition.
The child is asked to assume a pose and remain in it with their eyes closed for 75 seconds, ignoring distractors occurring at regular intervals.
A subscale score is computed for each subtest.
Reliabilities for the NEPSY at ages 3 through 7 are > .70.
|
Outcome (~9 months after baseline evaluation)
|
|
Shape School
Time Frame: Outcome (~9 months after baseline evaluation)
|
This assessment is a developmentally appropriate task developed for preschoolers assessing inhibition and switching.
The child is presented with a colorful storybook of colorful circle and square figures and is administered 4 conditions (control, inhibit, switch, concurrent/both).
In the control condition, the child names the colors of the figures as fast as possible.
In the inhibit (response suppression) condition, the child only named the colors of the figures with happy faces and not frustrated faces.
In the switch (attention control) condition, the child names the shapes of figures wearing hats.
In the concurrent condition, the child is asked to name the figures (color or shape), who were both wearing hats and had happy faces.
Cronbach's alpha coefficients for each condition exceeds 0.71.
|
Outcome (~9 months after baseline evaluation)
|
|
Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, Pelham (SKAMP) Teacher Rating Scale
Time Frame: Outcome (~9 months after baseline evaluation)
|
Teachers will be asked to complete the SKAMP to measure impairments in classroom functioning related to disruptive behaviors.
|
Outcome (~9 months after baseline evaluation)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2017
Study Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2014
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 22, 2014
First Posted (Estimate)
August 26, 2014
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 29, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 25, 2018
Last Verified
January 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- FP00006613
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Executive Dysfunction
-
Florida State UniversityRecruiting
-
University of FribourgSwiss National Science Foundation; University of Bern; University of Geneva,...CompletedExecutive Dysfunction | LanguageSwitzerland
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompletedExecutive Dysfunction | Poor Exercise AdherenceUnited States
-
University GhentUniversity Hospital, GhentCompletedChild | Motor Activity | Executive Dysfunction
-
Institute for Human Development and Potential (IHDP)...Nanyang Technological University; National Institute of Education; Institute...RecruitingMental Health Wellness 1 | Executive Dysfunction | Physical StressSingapore
-
Children's National Research InstituteAppleTree Institute; The Maddux SchoolCompletedExecutive DysfunctionUnited States
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteTerminatedExecutive Dysfunction | Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Gait PerformanceCanada
-
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University...Unknown
-
Wayne State UniversityWithdrawnPain | Executive Dysfunction | MoodUnited States
-
Malahat AmaniCompletedExecutive Dysfunction | Obsessive-Compulsive SymptomIran, Islamic Republic of
Clinical Trials on Classroom Intervention
-
Mayo ClinicActive, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | ACL InjuryUnited States
-
Inonu UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
University of MichiganCompleted
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); Boston Children...Recruiting
-
Cukurova UniversityNot yet recruitingMidwifery StudentTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Carnegie Mellon UniversityTerminated
-
Rizwana MallickUniversity of Cape Town; National Research Fund - South AfricaUnknownBullying of Child | Stuttering in Adolescence
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalRecruitingHealth Behavior | Adverse Pregnancy Outcome | Experiential Classroom | Preconception EducationChina
-
Sakarya UniversityCompleted
-
Purdue UniversityEgg Nutrition CenterCompletedObesity | Mood | Eating Behavior | BreakfastUnited States