Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block With Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

May 9, 2019 updated by: Ali Ahiskalioglu, Ataturk University

Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Postoperative Pain for Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) is a newly described and effective interfascial plane block for thoracic and abdominal surgery. It was first described by Forero et al. in 2016, effectiveness being reported in four cases. The paravertebral block has been successfully used in various surgical patient groups for purposes of anesthesia or postoperative pain management such as thoracotomy, breast surgery and abdominal surgery. The aim of this study is to compare the analgesic effects of erector spinae plane block and paravertebral block in patients undergoing video assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Erzurum, Turkey, 25100
        • Ataturk University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologist's physiologic state I-III patients
  • Undergoing video assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • chronic pain
  • bleeding disorders
  • renal or hepatic insufficiency
  • patients on chronic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications
  • emergency cases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block
ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with 20 ml %0.25 bupivacaine
Drug: Bupivacaine Hcl 0.25% Inj
Single shot 20 ml 0.25 bupivacaine
Active Comparator: ultrasound guided paravertebral block
ultrasound guided paravertebral block with 20 ml %0.25 bupivacaine
Drug: Bupivacaine Hcl 0.25% Inj
Single shot 20 ml 0.25 bupivacaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative opioid consumption
Time Frame: First 24 hours
First 24 hours total fentanyl consumption with patient controlled analgesia
First 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analog pain score
Time Frame: postoperative 0-24 hours
Post operative pain will be evaluated with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 0-10 (0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain)
postoperative 0-24 hours
Block performing time
Time Frame: First hour
The block time was defined as the period between the insertion of the needle and termination of local anesthetic administration
First hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Ataturk University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AUTF ANESTHESIA5

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine Hcl 0.25% Inj

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Hungary

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe