Evaluation of Intubation Rescue Techniques on Management of Difficult Airway

June 20, 2018 updated by: Ayse Zeynep Turan, Derince Training and Research Hospital

Evaluation of Rescue Techniques After Failed Direct Laryngoscopy: A Multicentered Prospective Observational Study

When difficult airway/intubation occurs in the OR the anesthesiologist needs rescue techniques and equipment. The algorithms about management of the difficult airway don't provide adequate data. In current study researchers aim to determine most preferred rescue techniques and success rate of the chosen technique.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In anesthesia setting Failed tracheal intubation, leading mortality and morbidity is very important. In operation room when a Difficult intubation occured with concurrent difficult mask ventilation rapid manipulation and quick decision are lifesaving. The Presence of assistant medical personnel or rescue equipment and crisis management of physician is crucial. In anesthesia practice when difficult airway occured rescue techniques are used to facilitate the intubation but difficult airway algorithms do not provide adequate information which rescue technique should be used in a state of emergency in OR thereby current trial was designed to determine which rescue techniques are used in everyday practice to manage difficult intubation, success and complication rates of chosen techniques.

Aim of the study

  1. Most preferred rescue technique of the anesthesiologist When a difficult airway or difficult intubation ventilation occured
  2. success rate of the chosen technique
  3. Incidence of possible complications
  4. Most preferred rescue technique of the anesthesiologist on presence of the difficult mask ventilation

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

92

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Marmara University School of Medicine
      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Haydarpasa Numune Researh and Training Hospital
      • Kocaeli, Turkey, 41900
        • Derince Research and Training Hospital
      • Kocaeli, Turkey
        • Kocaeli University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia over 18 years old

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged over 18 years
  • patient underwent surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pediatric patients
  • patients who will intubate due to rapid serial intubation protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Difficult intubation,
Patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia will be follow up. Patients predicted difficult intubation/airway or established difficult intubation/airway after anesthesia induction will be included. Which rescue technique will be used after unsuccessful direct laryngoscopy will be recorded.
which rescue technique will be preferred while established/predicted difficult airway/intubation occurs in the operation room after failed direct laryngoscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
which rescue technique will be chosen by the anesthesiologist after failed direct laryngoscopy
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after induction, an expected average of 1 hour
In case of a difficult airway situation after anesthesia induction patients will be enrolled to the study. Researchers will observe the case and record the chosen rescue technique such as video laryngoscope, supraglottic airway device, fiberoptic intubation or tracheostomy. Here the researchers aim to observe the preferred rescue method of providing an intact airway.
Participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after induction, an expected average of 1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the success rate of chosen technique for providing an intact airway
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after induction, an expected average of 1 hour
Tracheal intubation or supraglottic airway device insertion period will be observed. When end tidal CO2 will be seen on the monitor patient's airway will be accepted as successfully provided. .
Participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after induction, an expected average of 1 hour
Complications due to intubation
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after induction, an expected average of 12 hour
intubation period will be observed and patients will be followed up for complications including throat pain, trauma (pharyngeal, laryngeal, teeth, palate) hypoxemia, death,
Participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after induction, an expected average of 12 hour
Determination of the most preferred rescue technique for the anesthesiologists during difficult airway management.
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after induction, an expected average of 1 hour
The researchers aim to determine the most preferred rescue technique for the anesthesiologists during difficult airway management.Researchers will observe the case and record the chosen rescue technique such as video laryngoscope, supraglottic airway device, fiberoptic intubation or tracheostomy. Here the researchers aim to observe the preferred rescue method of providing an intact airway.
Participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after induction, an expected average of 1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: mehmet yilmaz, Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Kocaeli Derince Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 3, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Difficult Intubation

Clinical Trials on rescue technique

3
Subscribe