- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03550001
Carbon Nanoparticles as Lymph Node Tracer in Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy (CALOR-NAT)
May 25, 2018 updated by: YE Yingjiang
Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Carbon Nanoparticles as Lymph Node Tracer in Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether injection of carbon nanoparticle as a lymph node tracer before neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in rectal cancer can increase lymph node yield after surgery compared which do not inject.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is the randomized controlled, multi-centers,and open-labeled study.
The lymph node yield was significantly decreased in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (NAT), hard for pathologists to detect, and is difficult to meet the guideline that minimun of 12 lymph nodes should be retrived after surgery in colorectal cancer.
Carbon nanoparticle (CNP) is a specific lymph node tracer, which only dyeing the lymph node, and can keep the lymph node in dyeing state in at least half year.
The inverstigator attempted to compare the amount of lymph node yield after surgery in locally advanced rectal caner between injection CNP before NAT and no injection CNP before NAT.
In this study, the participants with clinical TNM stage T3+ or N+ will be recruited.
The participants will be randomized (1:1 ratio) to a control and intervention arm.
The participants in the control arm will not receive injection of any kind lymph node tracers.
The participants in the intervention arm will receive injection of CNP before NAT.
And the specimen would be evaluated by the pathologist.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
252
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Yingjiang Ye, MD,PhD
- Phone Number: 8610-88326608
- Email: yeyingjiang@pkuph.edu.cn, yjye101@sina.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Zhidong Gao, MD
- Phone Number: 8610-88326605
- Email: gaozhidong@pkuph.edu.cn
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age: 18-75 years old;
- Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma;
- The rectal adenocarcinoma 0-12cm from the anal margin;
- Clinical TNM stage: T3+ or N+;
- Untreated patients (who have not received treatment including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery);
- Good liver and kidney function, without contraindications for radiotherapy, chemotherapy or surgery;
- Able and willing to give informed consent to participate;
Exclusion Criteria:
- Malignant tumor history or other malignant tumors;
- Emergency operations such as intestinal obstruction, perforation and hemorrhage;
- Pregnant or lactating women;
- History of severe mental illness;
- Contraindications for radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery;
- Conditions that the researcher thinks it is not suitable for selection.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: OTHER
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Injection CNP before NAT
Inject carbon nanoparticle as a lymph node tracer before the patient receive neoadjuvant therapy.
|
Injection carbon nanoparticle via rectal mucosa before neoadjuvant therapy
|
|
NO_INTERVENTION: No injection
Do not inject carbon nanoparticle during the treatment.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
lymph node yield
Time Frame: up to 30days after total mesorectal excision
|
Amount of lymph node yield, dyeing lymph node, positive lymph node and the dyeing positive lymph node
|
up to 30days after total mesorectal excision
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Impact on surgical operations
Time Frame: Time of surgery
|
The impact of CNP to operational level
|
Time of surgery
|
|
Quality of surgery
Time Frame: Time of surgery
|
Quality of surgery determined using the mesorectal grading system
|
Time of surgery
|
|
Surgery morbidity
Time Frame: 30 days and 12-months
|
Surgical morbidity reported according to Clavien-Dindo classification
|
30 days and 12-months
|
|
Overall survival
Time Frame: 5-years
|
Overall Survival is defined as the time from the date of surgery to the date of death
|
5-years
|
|
Disease free survival
Time Frame: 5-years
|
Disease Free Survival is defined as the time from the date of surgery to the date of the local recurrence, and/or distant disease, or tumor-related death
|
5-years
|
|
Local recurrence rate
Time Frame: 5-years
|
Local recurrence rate is defined as the time from the date of surgery to the date of the local recurrence
|
5-years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.
- Glynne-Jones R, Wyrwicz L, Tiret E, Brown G, Rodel C, Cervantes A, Arnold D; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv22-iv40. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx224. No abstract available. Erratum In: Ann Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;29(Suppl 4):iv263.
- Mechera R, Schuster T, Rosenberg R, Speich B. Lymph node yield after rectal resection in patients treated with neoadjuvant radiation for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Feb;72:84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.10.031. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
- Gurawalia J, Dev K, Nayak SP, Kurpad V, Pandey A. Less than 12 lymph nodes in the surgical specimen after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy: an indicator of tumor regression in locally advanced rectal cancer? J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Dec;7(6):946-957. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2016.09.03.
- Kim HJ, Jo JS, Lee SY, Kim CH, Kim YJ, Kim HR. Low Lymph Node Retrieval After Preoperative Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer is Associated with Improved Prognosis in Patients with a Good Tumor Response. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(6):2075-81. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4235-z. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
- Xu Z, Berho ME, Becerra AZ, Aquina CT, Hensley BJ, Arsalanizadeh R, Noyes K, Monson JRT, Fleming FJ. Lymph node yield is an independent predictor of survival in rectal cancer regardless of receipt of neoadjuvant therapy. J Clin Pathol. 2017 Jul;70(7):584-592. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-203995. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
- Lykke J, Jess P, Roikjaer O; Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. A minimum yield of twelve lymph nodes in rectal cancer remains valid in the era of neo-adjuvant treatment : results from a national cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Mar;30(3):347-51. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2145-6. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
- Lykke J, Jess P, Roikjaer O; Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Increased Lymph Node Yield Is Associated With Improved Survival in Rectal Cancer Irrespective of Neoadjuvant Treatment: Results From a National Cohort Study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Sep;58(9):823-30. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000429.
- Bhangu A, Kiran RP, Brown G, Goldin R, Tekkis P. Establishing the optimum lymph node yield for diagnosis of stage III rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2014 Aug;18(8):709-17. doi: 10.1007/s10151-013-1114-8. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
- Carvalho C, Glynne-Jones R. Challenges behind proving efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):e354-e363. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30346-7. Erratum In: Lancet Oncol. 2018 Mar;19(3):e137.
- Horne J, Carr NJ, Bateman AC, Kandala N 2nd, Adams J, Silva S, Ryder I. A comparison of formalin and GEWF in fixation of colorectal carcinoma specimens: rates of lymph node retrieval and effect on TNM staging. J Clin Pathol. 2016 Jun;69(6):511-7. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203281. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
- Yegen G, Keskin M, Buyuk M, Kunduz E, Balik E, Saglam EK, Kapran Y, Asoglu O, Gulluoglu M. The effect of neoadjuvant therapy on the size, number, and distribution of mesorectal lymph nodes. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2016 Feb;20:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
- Munster M, Hanisch U, Tuffaha M, Kube R, Ptok H. Ex Vivo Intra-arterial Methylene Blue Injection in Rectal Cancer Specimens Increases the Lymph-Node Harvest, Especially After Preoperative Radiation. World J Surg. 2016 Feb;40(2):463-70. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3230-2.
- Farinella E, Vigano L, Fava MC, Mineccia M, Bertolino F, Capussotti L. In vivo lymph node mapping and pattern of metastasis spread in locally advanced mid/low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Nov;28(11):1523-9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1727-4. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
- Zhang XM, Liang JW, Wang Z, Kou JT, Zhou ZX. Effect of preoperative injection of carbon nanoparticle suspension on the outcomes of selected patients with mid-low rectal cancer. Chin J Cancer. 2016 Apr 4;35:33. doi: 10.1186/s40880-016-0097-z.
- Wang Y, Deng H, Chen H, Liu H, Xue Q, Yan J, Li G. Preoperative Submucosal Injection of Carbon Nanoparticles Improves Lymph Node Staging Accuracy in Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Nov;221(5):923-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.07.455. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
- Mandard AM, Dalibard F, Mandard JC, Marnay J, Henry-Amar M, Petiot JF, Roussel A, Jacob JH, Segol P, Samama G, et al. Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer. 1994 Jun 1;73(11):2680-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940601)73:113.0.co;2-c.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ANTICIPATED)
June 1, 2018
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
June 1, 2019
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
October 1, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 25, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 25, 2018
First Posted (ACTUAL)
June 8, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
June 8, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 25, 2018
Last Verified
May 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2017-PKUPH077
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
IPD Plan Description
We need to discuss with other centers, then decide whether to share IPD
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.