- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03562247
Telenursing and Remote Monitoring in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)
March 31, 2023 updated by: Lisa Lancaster, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Telenursing With or Without Remote Monitoring Compared to Usual Care for Patients Newly Diagnosed With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Numerous studies show that remote monitoring and/or telenursing improves outcomes for patients especially those with chronic diseases.
It is proposed that structured telenursing with non-invasive home monitoring of forced vital capacity and oxygen saturation in newly diagnosed patients with IPF will decrease hospitalizations for respiratory illness, increase compliance with therapies, and ultimately increase quality of life.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients undergoing evaluation for and who are diagnosed with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis at Vanderbilt Medical Center from August 1, 2018, will be asked to participate.
If agrees, and after signing the consent form, patients will be randomized into one of three arms: Usual Care, Usual Care with Telenursing, or Usual Care with Telenursing and Remote Monitoring.
Patients will be asked to remain in the study for a minimum of three years.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
31
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient must be newly diagnosed with IPF by a Vanderbilt pulmonologist according to the 2011 American Thoracic Society Guidelines. If the patient has been diagnosed by local pulmonologist and started on FDA-approved treatment, then must have been started on treatment within 6 months of Vanderbilt University Medical Center-based diagnosis.
- Willingness to complete Quality of Life and Compliance Questionnaires at 6-month intervals either via an on-line process (RED Cap survey) or paper-based.
- Willingness to participate in phone calls/video calls with the nurse practitioner or nurse case manager, if assigned to Arm 2 or Arm 3.
- Willingness to complete and monitor daily health assessments, if assigned to Arm 3.
- Willingness to share objective data via a provided electronic web-based portal, electronically via email, fax, or regular mail.
- Willingness to notify, or allow notification, of study involvement with local pulmonary practices.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed with any other interstitial lung disease.
- Diagnosed and began treatment > 6 months before the VUMC-based diagnosis date.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Usual Care of IPF
Newly diagnosed patients will continue to receive excellent healthcare as currently given in management of the lung disease
|
standard of care given to patients with IPF
|
|
Experimental: Telenursing
Patients will receive usual care with structured phone calls from the nurse practitioner and/or case manager occuring more frequently earlier in the diagnosis to help the patient and care giver understand all aspects of the disease and it time will evolve to managing symptoms outside of out-patient clinic visits.
|
standard of care given to patients with IPF
scheduled phone calls with the patient and care giver
|
|
Experimental: Telenursing and Remote Monitoring
Patients will receive usual care with telenursing and will be given a hand held spirometer and puse oximeter and be asked to take daily measurements and report these via an electronic HIPAA approved secured platform for evaluation by the telenursing team.
|
standard of care given to patients with IPF
scheduled phone calls with the patient and care giver
scheduled phone calls and home monitoring of physiologic parameters
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Number Hospitalization Events Resulting From a Respiratory Illness
Time Frame: Baseline to 21 months
|
The number hospitalization events resulting from a respiratory illness
|
Baseline to 21 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Number of Respiratory Events That Indicate a Worsening of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)
Time Frame: Baseline to 21 months
|
The number of respiratory events that indicate a worsening of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)
|
Baseline to 21 months
|
|
The Number of Acute Exacerbations of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)
Time Frame: Baseline to 21 months
|
The Number of Acute Exacerbations of IPF
|
Baseline to 21 months
|
|
The Number of Days From Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) Diagnosis to First Hospitalization for Respiratory Illness
Time Frame: Baseline to 21 months
|
The total combined number of days for all participants in each arm from the date of IPF diagnosis to the date of first hospitalization for respiratory illness.
|
Baseline to 21 months
|
|
The Severity of Dyspnea as Measured by the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale
Time Frame: Baseline to 21 months
|
Dyspnea (shortness of breath) was assessed using the mMRC, a single item (0-4) scale assessing current level of dyspnea.
The mMRC comprised of five statements that describe almost the entire range of respiratory disability from none (Grade 0) to almost complete incapacity (Grade 4).
The mMRC categorized participants into low dyspnea (Grades 0-1) and high dyspnea (Grades 2-4).
|
Baseline to 21 months
|
|
The Severity of Depression as Measured by the Adapted Mental Health America Depression Screening Tool
Time Frame: Up to 21 months
|
The adapted Mental Health America Depression Screening Tool is an 8 question self-administered questionnaire that scores patient-reported symptoms of depression.
The possible score for each question ranges from 0-3.
The total questionnaire score range is 0-24.
Total scores of 0-6 indicate 'none to mild depression' and scores of 16-24 indicate 'severe depression'.
Data from participant visits at baseline, 3 months, 9 months, 15 months and 21 months were combined and averaged to calculate a single value.
|
Up to 21 months
|
|
The Severity of Anxiety as Measured by the Adapted New Zealand Health Promotion Agency Anxiety Self-Test
Time Frame: Baseline to 21 months
|
The adapted New Zealand Health Promotion Agency Anxiety Self-Test is an 8 question self-administered questionnaire that scores patient-reported symptoms of anxiety.
The possible score for each question ranges from 0-3.
The total questionnaire score range is 0-24.
Total scores of 0-8 indicate 'none to mild anxiety' and scores of 16-24 indicate 'severe anxiety'.
Data from participant visits at baseline, 3 months, 9 months, 15 months and 21 months were combined and averaged to calculate a single value.
|
Baseline to 21 months
|
|
The Percentage of Change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Measured by Spirometry
Time Frame: Baseline to 21 months
|
The percentage of change in home-measured forced vital capacity (FVC) compared to clinic-measured FVC via spirometry
|
Baseline to 21 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lisa Lancaster, MD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 1, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 26, 2020
Study Completion (Actual)
May 26, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 14, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
June 19, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
January 15, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 31, 2023
Last Verified
March 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Tenure-1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.