Evaluation of Segmented Versus Full Arch Three Dimensionally Printed Transfer Tray for Orthodontic Indirect Bonding

June 19, 2018 updated by: Mariam Alaa, Cairo University

Evaluation of Segmented Versus Full Arch Three Dimensionally Printed Transfer Tray for Orthodontic Indirect Bonding: Randomized Controlled Trial

This study is conducted to overcome the problems of conventional indirect bonding technique, through investigating accuracy of two novel three dimensionally digitally printed indirect bonding transfer trays (full arch & segmented) in terms of accuracy of transferring brackets, rate of immediate bond failure and chair side time.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Fourteen patients (7 in each group) with mild to moderate crowding, requiring orthodontic treatment with full set of permanent teeth including second molars, will be selected for this study. A total of 196 brackets will be used (98 Full Arch Tray and 98 Segment Arch Tray). The same bracket type and bonding material will used in both groups. The accuracy of bracket transfer will be measured by 3 Shape Ortho planner software (Bracket Placement Module), rate of bond failure by counting number of debonded brackets upon tray removal & chair side time by using digital watch.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

132

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 38 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients seeking fixed orthodontic treatment with full set of permanent teeth including second molars.
  2. No sex predilection.
  3. Mild to moderate crowding cases (4-6 mm).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severely rotated teeth
  2. Enamel hypoplasia or hypocalcification.
  3. Systemic disease that contraindicates orthodontic treatment.
  4. Presence of deep carious lesions or large restorations.
  5. No or poor patient's compliance & bad oral hygiene.
  6. Psychological problems.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Segmented Three dimensionally printed transfer tray
Segmented indirect bonding transfer tray
No Intervention: Full arch three dimensionally printed transfer tray

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of 3D printed full arch &segmented transfer tray.
Time Frame: immediate
Using Digital Measurements on 3shape software in mm- degrees
immediate

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Chairside Time
Time Frame: immediate
Digital stopwatch in seconds
immediate
Immediate Bond Failure
Time Frame: immediate
Counting number of brackets or tubes failed immediately after bonding
immediate

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

July 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 30, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CEBD-CU-2018-04-17

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inaccurate Transfer and Bond Failure of Conventional Indirect Bonding Tray

3
Subscribe