- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03564717
Evaluation of Segmented Versus Full Arch Three Dimensionally Printed Transfer Tray for Orthodontic Indirect Bonding
June 19, 2018 updated by: Mariam Alaa, Cairo University
Evaluation of Segmented Versus Full Arch Three Dimensionally Printed Transfer Tray for Orthodontic Indirect Bonding: Randomized Controlled Trial
This study is conducted to overcome the problems of conventional indirect bonding technique, through investigating accuracy of two novel three dimensionally digitally printed indirect bonding transfer trays (full arch & segmented) in terms of accuracy of transferring brackets, rate of immediate bond failure and chair side time.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Fourteen patients (7 in each group) with mild to moderate crowding, requiring orthodontic treatment with full set of permanent teeth including second molars, will be selected for this study.
A total of 196 brackets will be used (98 Full Arch Tray and 98 Segment Arch Tray).
The same bracket type and bonding material will used in both groups.
The accuracy of bracket transfer will be measured by 3 Shape Ortho planner software (Bracket Placement Module), rate of bond failure by counting number of debonded brackets upon tray removal & chair side time by using digital watch.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
132
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
16 years to 38 years (Child, Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients seeking fixed orthodontic treatment with full set of permanent teeth including second molars.
- No sex predilection.
- Mild to moderate crowding cases (4-6 mm).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severely rotated teeth
- Enamel hypoplasia or hypocalcification.
- Systemic disease that contraindicates orthodontic treatment.
- Presence of deep carious lesions or large restorations.
- No or poor patient's compliance & bad oral hygiene.
- Psychological problems.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Segmented Three dimensionally printed transfer tray
|
Segmented indirect bonding transfer tray
|
No Intervention: Full arch three dimensionally printed transfer tray
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Accuracy of 3D printed full arch &segmented transfer tray.
Time Frame: immediate
|
Using Digital Measurements on 3shape software in mm- degrees
|
immediate
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Chairside Time
Time Frame: immediate
|
Digital stopwatch in seconds
|
immediate
|
Immediate Bond Failure
Time Frame: immediate
|
Counting number of brackets or tubes failed immediately after bonding
|
immediate
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
July 1, 2018
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
November 30, 2018
Study Completion (Anticipated)
December 30, 2018
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 8, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 19, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
June 21, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 21, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 19, 2018
Last Verified
June 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- CEBD-CU-2018-04-17
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Undecided
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Inaccurate Transfer and Bond Failure of Conventional Indirect Bonding Tray
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownInaccurate Transfer and Bond Failure of Conventional Indirect Bonding Tray | Accuracy of Bracket Transfer and Bond Failure Rate of Digitally Printed Transfer Tray With Windows and Conventional Thermoformed Transfer Tray
-
Marmara UniversityRecruitingOrthodontics | Indirect Bonding | Bracket Bonding | Digital Indirect Bonding Transfer Tray | Accuracy of Bracket PositioningTurkey