Testing Psychosocial Treatment Planning Methods for Youth Anxiety and Depression

January 27, 2020 updated by: David A. Langer, Boston University Charles River Campus

Personalizing Treatment Through Shared Decision Making for Youth Psychotherapy

Youth depression and anxiety represent a serious public health concern, with affected youth often experiencing social, familial, and academic impairment. Research evidence supports a growing array of effective treatments for youth depression and anxiety, yet as the collection of evidence-based treatments expands, so do the challenges of utilizing the evidence: clinicians must be able to (1) access, integrate, and apply the available evidence, and (2) engage in a collaborative process with each family to develop a plan that is responsive to each family's unique characteristics, preferences, and goals. Engaging caregivers and youths as active collaborators in the treatment planning process is a patient-centered approach with the potential to improve the process and outcome of youth mental health care by facilitating the personalization of established evidence-based treatment approaches. Such collaboration, frequently referred to as shared decision-making (SDM), is a hallmark of evidence-based practice and a key feature of federal guidelines for health care delivery. However, despite growing rhetorical support for SDM, empirical support is lacking, particularly in the area of youth mental health treatment. The absence of such research is unfortunate, given the potential for SDM to facilitate the dissemination and implementation of evidence-based treatments, and to personalize the use of established treatments to increase acceptability, retention, satisfaction, and overall effectiveness.

The present project tests the feasibility and acceptability of SDM through a pilot randomized controlled trial of 40 youths (ages 7-15) meeting diagnostic criteria for an anxiety or depressive disorder. The trial will compare an evidence-based treatment that is planned collaboratively with youths and caregivers using the SDM protocol, to an evidence-based treatment that is planned by the clinician and supervisor using pretreatment assessment data. Eligible youths will received up to 26 treatment sessions at no cost and complete assessments prior to the start of treatment, at the end of treatment, and six months following the end of treatment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Boston University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a current DSM-5 principal diagnosis of a Major Depressive Disorder, Dysthymic Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Separation Anxiety Disorder, Social Phobia, or Specific Phobia
  • if receiving psychiatric medication, dose will be stable for at least 3 months at enrollment with ability to maintain medication
  • youth and caregiver speak fluent English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • active suicidality
  • history of severe physical or mental impairments (e.g., mental retardation, autism spectrum disorders) in youth or caregiver
  • participation in additional psychosocial treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Shared Decision Making
In this arm, parents and children will participate in a shared decision-making protocol with the clinician to plan their treatment. The treatment options available are established, evidence-based treatment techniques. The shared decision-making protocol was developed for this research project.
MATCH is a collection of 31 modules that correspond to the treatment procedures included in standard evidence-based treatments for youth depression, anxiety, and behavioral disorders.
Active Comparator: Clinician Guided
In this arm, the clinician will plan the treatment in consultation with their supervisor, and share the treatment plan with the parent and child. The parent and child will have the opportunity to ask questions about the treatment plan (and, if they do not agree, reject the treatment plan), but they are not actively involved in making each decision. This is more typical of usual care.
MATCH is a collection of 31 modules that correspond to the treatment procedures included in standard evidence-based treatments for youth depression, anxiety, and behavioral disorders.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV - Child/Parent
Time Frame: Through completion of treatment, anticipated to be an average of 5 months
The Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV - Child/Parent is an extensively tested semi-structured interview assessing the major anxiety, mood, and externalizing disorders.
Through completion of treatment, anticipated to be an average of 5 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction with Decision Scale
Time Frame: At the start of treatment, anticipated to be an average of 3 weeks after the initial assessment
The 6-item Satisfaction with Decision Scale assesses satisfaction with treatment-related decisions. The scale score ranges from 6 (very low satisfaction) to 30 (very high satisfaction).
At the start of treatment, anticipated to be an average of 3 weeks after the initial assessment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David A Langer, Ph.D., Boston University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 4, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 27, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 3462
  • K23MH101238 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe