Haloperidol for Delirium in Adult Critically Ill Patients (EuRIDICE)

May 6, 2022 updated by: Mathieu van der Jagt, Erasmus Medical Center

Efficacy of Haloperidol to Decrease the Burden of Delirium in Adult Critically Ill Patients (EuRIDICE): a Prospective Randomised Multi-center Double-blind Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial

The EuRIDICE trial will study whether haloperidol as a first line treatment for ICU delirium reduces delirium duration (and severity). Adverse outcomes typically associated with delirium will also be studied and include long term cognition, functional outcome and quality of life. Further, patient and family experiences and cost-effectiveness will be assessed. Finally, safety concerns associated with the use of haloperidol in this vulnerable population will be studied.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND. Although widely used, the efficacy and safety of haloperidol for delirium in critically ill adults remain unclear. A randomised controlled trial is warranted to study the effect of haloperidol on delirium or coma, long-term outcomes, safety concerns, and cost-effectiveness.

SUMMARY.

The investigators will perform a multi-center, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the use of haloperidol for delirium treatment in 742 critically ill adults with delirium. Days spent without delirium- or coma in the first 14 days after randomisation is the primary outcome. Study drug will be initiated at 2.5mg IV q8h and increased after 24 hours to 5mg IV q8h if delirium persists. Study drug dose will be tapered when delirium has resolved during 24 hours. All patients will be managed with a standardized pain, agitation and delirium protocol. Standard operating procedures for agitation (analgesia titration, alpha2 agonists) and hallucination management (atypical antipsychotics) will be implemented to accommodate possible imbalances of these symptoms in both treatment arms. Open-label haloperidol administration is discouraged during the trial. The sample size provides a power of 90% to detect statistically significant results (p<.05) and a true treatment difference of one day for the primary outcome between trial arms.

This trial is expected to answer the clinically relevant question whether haloperidol still deserves a place in ICU delirium management. The primary outcome (delirium- and coma-free days) will be related to the secondary outcomes cognitive dysfunction, functional and psychological outcomes and patient- and family experiences. An extensive cost-effectiveness analysis will be done. Mortality at one year and safety concerns of haloperidol (QTc prolongation on EKG and rigidity) will be assessed as secondary endpoints. In conclusion, this large multicentre trial will assess efficacy and safety of haloperidol for ICU delirium.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

142

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
        • Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
      • Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands
        • Ijsselland Hospital
      • Dordrecht, Netherlands
        • Albert Schweitzer Hospital
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands
        • Radboudumc
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • Maasstad Hospital
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • ErasmusMC
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • Franciscus Gasthuis (Hospital)
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • Ikazia Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria for randomisation:

  1. Delirium, as assessed with the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist - ICDSC: ≥4 or Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU - CAM-ICU: positive). NB Delirium can occur in the course of ICU admission or be present at admission.
  2. Written Informed Consent is obtained from patient or legal representative
  3. Complies with inclusion criteria but NOT exclusion criteria for eligibility:

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria for eligibility

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Admitted to ICU.

Exclusion criteria for eligibility

  1. Admitted to ICU with a neurological diagnosis (such as acute stroke, traumatic brain injury, intracranial malignancy, anoxic coma). Previous non-acute stroke or other previous neurological condition without cognitive deterioration is not an exclusion criterion.
  2. Pregnancy (to be excluded by pregnancy test in women of child baring age)
  3. History of ventricular arrhythmia including "torsade de pointes" (TdP)
  4. Known allergy to haloperidol
  5. History of dementia or an Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) score ≥ 4
  6. History of malignant neuroleptic syndrome or parkinsonism (either Parkinson's disease or another hypokinetic rigid syndrome)
  7. Schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder
  8. Inability to conduct valid delirium screening assessment (e.g. coma, deaf, blind) or inability to speak Dutch
  9. The patient is expected to die within 24 hours, or is expected to leave the ICU within 24 hours after evaluation (may be reassessed daily)

Exclusion Criteria for randomisation:

  1. Prolonged QT-interval (QTc > 500ms)
  2. (recent) "torsade de pointes" (TdP)
  3. (recent) malignant neuroleptic syndrome or parkinsonism
  4. Evidence of acute alcohol (or substance) withdrawal requiring pharmacological intervention (e.g. benzodiazepines or alfa-2 agonist) to treat
  5. IQCODE not assessed
  6. The patient is expected to die within 24 hours, or is expected to leave the ICU within 24 hours.
  7. No (previously) signed informed consent by patient or representative
  8. Current participation in another intervention trial that is evaluating a medication, device or behavioural intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: haloperidol

study drug will be titrated based on delirium, diagnosed with a validated screening instrument (CAM-ICU or ICDSC), starting with 2.5mg IV q8h and titrated to a maximum of 5mg IV q8h.

Agitation and hallucinations will be managed according to a pre-specified protocol in both treatment arms. First the study drug will be increased when agitation or delirium remain present. Further options include mainly the use of alfa-2 agonists (agitation) or atypical antipsychotic drugs (hallucinations).

haloperidol for ICU delirium, titrated on validated screening tool-based diagnosis
Other Names:
  • not any
Placebo Comparator: placebo

study drug will be titrated based on delirium, diagnosed with a validated screening instrument (CAM-ICU or ICDSC), starting with 2.5mg IV q8h and titrated to a maximum of 5mg IV q8h.

Agitation and hallucinations will be managed according to a pre-specified protocol in both treatment arms. First the study drug will be increased when agitation or delirium remain present. Further options include mainly the use of alfa-2 agonists (agitation) or atypical antipsychotic drugs (hallucinations).

placebo for ICU delirium, titrated on validated screening tool-based diagnosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
delirium- and coma-free days
Time Frame: within the first 14 days after randomisation
days without brain dysfunction (=delirium OR coma) while at the ICU
within the first 14 days after randomisation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive deterioration: Global cognitive functioning
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
Global cognitive functioning as assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). Total score will be reported, with a range of 0-30 (higher values representing better cognitive functioning).
3 and 12 months
Cognitive deterioration: Verbal learning and memory
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
Auditory-verbal learning and memory will be assessed with the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Three subscores will be reported: total correct words in 5 trials (range: 0 -75), total correct words after delay (range: 0-15) and total correct words at recognition (range: 0-30).
3 and 12 months
Cognitive deterioration: Semantic fluency
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
Semantic fluency will be tested with the Semantic Category Fluency Test. The amount of animals given within a time of 60 seconds will represent the score.
3 and 12 months
Cognitive deterioration: Working memory
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
Working memory will be assessed using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Third Edition (WAIS-III). Subscales will be reported for both digit span under forward and backward recall conditions. In addition, a total score will be reported, which equals the sum of both separate digit spans.
3 and 12 months
Cognitive deterioration: Cognitive flexibility
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
Cognitive flexibility, one of the executive funcions, will be assessed with the Trialmaking tests A and B. The total amount of seconds needed to finish each test will be reported, with less seconds needed representing better cognitive flexibility.
3 and 12 months
Cognitive deterioration: Word retrieval
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
Word retrieval is tested with the Boston Naming Test (30-item version). The total score (range: 0-30) represents the amount of correct answered drawings.
3 and 12 months
Anxiety and depression
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
Anxiety and depression will be assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Two subscales will be reported, one for anxiety symptoms (range: 0-21) and one for depression symptoms (range: 0-21). Higher values represent a worse outcome. A subscore >8 indicates anxiety or depression, respectively.
3 and 12 months
Functional outcome
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
Health-related quality of life will be assessed with the Short Form-35 (SF-36). Nine subscales will be reported on a 0 - 100 scale: physical functioning, role functioning - physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role functioning - emotional, mental health and reported health transition. Higher values represent a better health-related quality of life.
3 and 12 months
mortality
Time Frame: 28 days and 1 year
mortality
28 days and 1 year
length of stay at ICU
Time Frame: days of ICU stay (time in days from ICU admission until ICU discharge). Assessed up to a maximum of 12 months after randomisation (end of follow-up period).
length of stay at ICU (days)
days of ICU stay (time in days from ICU admission until ICU discharge). Assessed up to a maximum of 12 months after randomisation (end of follow-up period).
Adverse drug associated events: prolonged QTc by EKG
Time Frame: while on study drug treatment during study period at ICU (up to 14 days after randomisation)
prolonged QTc by EKG (ms)
while on study drug treatment during study period at ICU (up to 14 days after randomisation)
Adverse drug associated events: muscle rigidity and other associated movements disorders
Time Frame: while on study drug treatment during study period at ICU (up to 14 days after randomisation)
muscle rigidity and other associated movements disorders [measured with the Simpson Angus Scale]
while on study drug treatment during study period at ICU (up to 14 days after randomisation)
Adverse drug associated events: ventricular arrhythmia's
Time Frame: during study period at ICU (up to 14 days after randomisation)
ventricular arrhythmia's including torsade de pointes
during study period at ICU (up to 14 days after randomisation)
Patients' memories related to their ICU stay
Time Frame: at discharge from hospital (up to a maximum of 12 months after randomisation = end of follow-up period) and 3 months after randomisation
Patients' memories for their ICU stay will be evaluated with the ICU Memory Tool (ICU-MT). Subscores will be reported for factual memories (range: 0-11), delusion memories (range: 0-6) and memories of feelings (range: 0-4).
at discharge from hospital (up to a maximum of 12 months after randomisation = end of follow-up period) and 3 months after randomisation
Patients' and family-members' experiences related to delirium
Time Frame: at discharge from hospital (up to a maximum of 12 months after randomisation = end of follow-up period) and 3 months after randomisation
Delirium recall and distress related to the delirium episode will be assessed with the Delirium Experience Questionnaire (DEQ). Scores will represent whether patients remember their delirium episode. In addition, a score representing delirium-related distress levels (range: 0-4, with higher values representing more distress) will be reported for both patients and family-members.
at discharge from hospital (up to a maximum of 12 months after randomisation = end of follow-up period) and 3 months after randomisation
Caregiver Strain
Time Frame: at 3 months after randomisation
The strain experienced by family-members or relatives will be assessed with the Caregiver Strain Index. A total score (range: 0-13) will be reported, with higher values representing higher experienced strain.
at 3 months after randomisation
Posttraumatic stress syndrome
Time Frame: at 3 months after randomisation
Posttraumatic stress symptoms in patients and families will be assessed with the Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R). A mean total IES-R score will be reported (range: 0-4), with posttraumatic stress disorder defined as a mean IES-R score ≥ 1.6. In addition, subscores will be reported for intrusion, avoidance and hyperarousal (range: 0-4).
at 3 months after randomisation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mathieu van der Jagt, MD PhD, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 22, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 3, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 23, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

Can be retrieved after contacting the principal investigator

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Delirium

Clinical Trials on Haloperidol

3
Subscribe