- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05995457
The IM-ZBULLE Study : " Z-track " and " Airlock " Techniques During Intramuscular Injection of Haloperidol Decanoate (IM-ZBULLE)
Efficacy of the Combination of " Z-track " and " Airlock " Techniques During Intramuscular Injection of Haloperidol Decanoate in Adult Patients With Schizophrenic or Related Disorder : A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Intramuscular injection (IMI) is the process of administering a drug treatment into muscle tissue. The transmission of skills in this care practice is essentially based on the experience of peers. In France, there are no official guidelines for this technical procedure.
Haloperidol decanoate is widely used in psychiatry. This long-acting antipsychotic treatment considerably reduces the risk of relapse and hospitalization. It is administered by IMI. This treatment is invasive, painful and risks complications for the patient. Nurses must ensure that the treatment is as painless as possible, and adapt their practice in line with current recommendations.
Among the various IMI techniques available, the "Z-track" and the "Airlock" limit leakage into subcutaneous tissues when the needle is withdrawn, by locking the active product into the muscular tissues. According to an exploratory study (n=303), 73% of nurses observe active product leakage after injections, and 89% of nurses are not familiar with either the "Z-track" or "Airlock" techniques.
Many foreign studies have been carried out to demonstrate the relevance of these techniques, particularly in terms of pain reduction during treatment, but the results have yet to be confirmed.
The investigators hypothesize that the combined use of the "Z-track" and "Airlock" techniques during intramuscular injection of Haloperidol decanoate is more effective in reducing patient pain than usual practice.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled, study in 2 parallel groups.
Experimental and control administration protocols will be standardized to harmonize injection practices between the different nurses providing care, and to control some variables. Nurses will have been trained in these protocols and in experimental injection techniques.
The experimental group will be offered an intramuscular injection using the "Z-track" and "Airlock" techniques, while the control group will have an "usual" injection.
An intermediate analysis of futility and efficacy is planned once 50% of the planned sample has completed the study.
The object of the research is the intramuscular injection procedure - Product injected: haloperidol decanoate (Haldol Decanoas®).
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Rayan BCHINI, IPA
- Phone Number: 33 1 42 11 75 90
- Email: rayan.francoisbchini@gh-paulguiraud.fr
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Cécile BERGOT
- Email: C.BERGOT@ghu-paris.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Villejuif, France, 94800
- Rayan BCHINI
-
Contact:
- Rayan BCHINI, Master 2 IPA
- Phone Number: +33142117590
- Email: rayan.francoisbchini@gh-paulguiraud.fr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult ;
- having an outpatient treatment in a Mental Health Community Center ("Centre Médico-Psychologique" CMP in french) ;
- with an CIM-10 diagnosis between F20-F29 (Schizophrenia, schizotypal disorder and delusional disorders);
- communicative and able to give free and informed consent to the study;
- prescribed Haloperidol decanoate;
- covered by the french social security
Exclusion Criteria:
- Minor ;
- pregnant women ;
- with insufficient understanding of the French language to understand the VAS;
- suffering from any of the following known somatic comorbidity : coagulation disorder, leucopenia, immunosuppression;
- currently prescribed treatment: immunosuppressant, anticoagulant, antibiotic, antiretroviral, other products administered by IMI at dorsogluteal injection sites (antibiotic therapy, hormone therapy, vitamin therapy).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intramuscular injection of Haloperidol decanoate using the "Z-track" and "Airlock" techniques
Intramuscular injection involves administering the drug treatment Haloperidol decanoate into muscle tissue using the "Z-track" and "Airlock" techniques.
|
Other: Intramuscular injection of Haloperidol decanoate using the "Z-track" and "Airlock" techniques
Intramuscular injection involves administering the drug treatment Haloperidol decanoate into muscle tissue using the "Z-track" and "Airlock" techniques
|
|
Other: Control arm, Intramuscular injection as usual
Intramuscular injection involves administering the drug Haloperidol decanoate into muscle tissue using the usual technique
|
Intramuscular injection involves administering the drug Haloperidol decanoate into muscle tissue using the usual technique.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
pain reduction
Time Frame: Day 0 intervention day T
|
To evaluate the efficacy of combining the "Z-track" and "Airlock" techniques concerning reducing pain in adult patients treated with Haloperidol decanoate.
The primary outcome measure is pain reduction, assessed using a millimeter-scale visual analogic scale (VAS) to measure pain perceived by the patient 5 minutes after the treatment.
The score is between 0 (minimum) and 10 (maximum) centimeters.
The higher the score, the worse the result.
|
Day 0 intervention day T
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Drug leakage reduction
Time Frame: Day 0 intervention day
|
To measure the loss (leakage) of active product when the needle is withdrawn : The outcome measure is a reduction in the loss of active product by assessing the diameter (using a millimeter scale) of active product that flow back through the puncture site using an absorbent pad.
|
Day 0 intervention day
|
|
Impact of the injection
Time Frame: Day 0 to Day 3
|
To measure the impact of combining the "Z-track" and "Airlock" techniques on potential complications related to treatment : The outcome measure is the reduction in signs of secondary complications, as measured by a pre- and post-injection clinical examination and a phone call to the patient between Day 1 and Day 3.
|
Day 0 to Day 3
|
|
Identifying the obstacles and levers to changing practices
Time Frame: During 14 Months
|
To identify the levers and obstacles to nurses' change of practice : The outcome measure is the identification of levers and obstacles to change in professional practice among psychiatric nurses, by means of a complementary qualitative descriptive study.
|
During 14 Months
|
|
Improving participants satisfaction
Time Frame: Day 14 or Day 21 or Day 28 depending to the frequency established by the prescription1
|
To measure overall patient satisfaction with the combination of "Z-track" and "Airlock" intramuscular injection techniques.
The outcome measure is participant satisfaction, assessed using Attkisson's CSQ-8 questionnaire.
This scale comprises 8 questions.
Depending on the answer, each question awards 1 to 4 points.
The score is therefore between 8 (minimum) and 32 (maximum) points.
The higher the score, the better the result.
|
Day 14 or Day 21 or Day 28 depending to the frequency established by the prescription1
|
|
Improving the therapeutic alliance
Time Frame: Day 0 (intervention day) and Day 14 or Day 21 or Day 28 depending to the frequency established by the prescription
|
To measure therapeutic alliance during follow-up :The outcome measure is the overall therapeutic alliance score, using the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) scale before and after intervention.
This scale comprises 12 questions.
Each question awards 1 to 5 points, depending on the answer.
The score is between 12 (minimum) and 60 (maximum) points.
The higher the score, the better the result.
|
Day 0 (intervention day) and Day 14 or Day 21 or Day 28 depending to the frequency established by the prescription
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Rayan BCHINI, GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Rodger MA, King L. Drawing up and administering intramuscular injections: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 2000 Mar;31(3):574-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01312.x.
- Ayinde O, Hayward RS, Ross JDC. The effect of intramuscular injection technique on injection associated pain; a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021 May 3;16(5):e0250883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250883. eCollection 2021.
- Sanlialp Zeyrek A, Takmak S, Kurban NK, Arslan S. Systematic review and meta-analysis: Physical-procedural interventions used to reduce pain during intramuscular injections in adults. J Adv Nurs. 2019 Dec;75(12):3346-3361. doi: 10.1111/jan.14183. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
- Bchini R, Goutte N. [Evidence-based practice and nursing: intramuscular injection in psychiatry]. Soins Psychiatr. 2023 May-Jun;44(346):21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.spsy.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 Jun 7. French.
- Wynaden D, Landsborough I, Chapman R, McGowan S, Lapsley J, Finn M. Establishing best practice guidelines for administration of intra muscular injections in the adult: a systematic review of the literature. Contemp Nurse. 2005 Dec;20(2):267-77. doi: 10.5172/conu.20.2.267.
- Keen MF. Comparison of intramuscular injection techniques to reduce site discomfort and lesions. Nurs Res. 1986 Jul-Aug;35(4):207-10.
- Kim KS. [Comparison of two intramuscular injection technics on the severity of discomfort and lesions at the injection site]. Kanho Hakhoe Chi. 1988 Dec;18(3):257-68. doi: 10.4040/jnas.1988.18.3.257. Korean.
- Quartermaine S, Taylor R. A comparative study of depot injection techniques. Nurs Times. 1995 Jul 26-Aug 1;91(30):36-9.
- Mac Gabhann L. A comparison of two depot injection techniques. Nurs Stand. 1998 Jun 3-9;12(37):39-41. doi: 10.7748/ns1998.06.12.37.39.c2512.
- Yilmaz DK, Dikmen Y, Kokturk F, Dedeoglu Y. The effect of air-lock technique on pain at the site of intramuscular injection. Saudi Med J. 2016 Mar;37(3):304-8. doi: 10.15537/smj.2016.3.13113.
- Kara D, Yapucu Gunes U. The effect on pain of three different methods of intramuscular injection: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Pract. 2016 Apr;22(2):152-9. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12358. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
- Heshmatifar N, Salari M, Rad M, Afshari Saleh T, Borzoee F, Rastaghi S. A New Approach on the pain management of intramuscular injection: A Triple-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Pain Manag Nurs. 2022 Jun;23(3):353-358. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2021.01.010. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
- Bloch Y, Mendlovic S, Strupinsky S, Altshuler A, Fennig S, Ratzoni G. Injections of depot antipsychotic medications in patients suffering from schizophrenia: do they hurt? J Clin Psychiatry. 2001 Nov;62(11):855-9. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v62n1104.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Mental Disorders
- Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders
- Schizophrenia
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Autonomic Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Antiemetics
- Gastrointestinal Agents
- Antipsychotic Agents
- Tranquilizing Agents
- Psychotropic Drugs
- Dopamine Agents
- Dopamine Antagonists
- Anti-Dyskinesia Agents
- Haloperidol
- Haloperidol decanoate
Other Study ID Numbers
- D23-P001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia; Psychosis
-
University of TorontoUniversity of British Columbia; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Queen... and other collaboratorsRecruitingPsychotic Disorders | Schizophrenia | Psychosis | Schizophrenia; PsychosisCanada
-
State reference center for psychosocial careUniversity of ValenciaCompleted
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterTerminatedSchizophrenia; PsychosisUnited States
-
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineGuangzhou Psychiatric Hospital; Suzhou Psychiatric Hospital; Tianjin Anding Hospital and other collaboratorsRecruitingSchizophrenia; Psychosis | Clinical High Risk | First Episode PsychosisChina
-
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center...RecruitingSchizophrenia | Schizophrenia; Psychosis | ApathyUnited States
-
Laval UniversityCompletedSchizophrenia and Schizophrenia Spectrum PsychosisCanada
-
Centre Hospitalier St AnneNot yet recruitingSchizo Affective Disorder | Schizophrenia; Psychosis | First Episode Psychosis (FEP)
-
King's College LondonCompletedSchizophrenia; PsychosisUnited Kingdom
-
University of British ColumbiaCompletedPsychosis, SchizophreniaCanada
-
Uppsala UniversityUppsala University HospitalRecruiting
Clinical Trials on Intramuscular injection of Haloperidol decanoate using the "Z-track" and "Airlock" techniques
-
Mayo ClinicRecruiting