- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03633214
Evaluation of An Online Intervention In Improving General Practitioners' Practice In Prostate Cancer Screening (ProCaSS)
The incidence of prostate cancer has been rising steadily both globally and in Malaysia. Besides an ageing population, another reason cited to explain the increase, is the corresponding increase in the prostate cancer screening rates, especially using non-invasive tests like the prostate specific antigen (PSA).
General practitioners, being front liners in medicine, play an important role in helping men make an informed decision on prostate cancer screening. In Malaysia, about 50% of GPs would routinely screen asymptomatic men and 95% of them would use PSA as a screening tool. Despite this, the evidence for screening is inconclusive, as evidenced from two major trials on screening [The European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening trial (PLCO)]. Furthermore, clinical practice guidelines globally provide conflicting recommendations on this subject, and none has been published in Malaysia to date.
Therefore, our study aims to determine the effectiveness of an online training module in helping GPs' better understand the controversies surrounding prostate cancer screening, and in so doing, improve their practice of screening. The investigators hypothesise that GPs who are randomised to receive their online module will be less inclined to screen unnecessarily for prostate cancer.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study design: Randomised controlled trial
Setting: This trial will involve GPs in the Klang Valley, encompassing the Petaling district and Kuala Lumpur.
The healthcare system in Malaysia is divided into public and private sectors. Patients pay a standard minimal fee for public healthcare system whereas the private sector charges patients based on the services provided. The study will be conducted in private GP clinics as PSA testing is readily available compared to the public primary care setting. In public primary care clinics, PSA screening is not offered as part of a routine screening programme.
Sample size:
With 80% power and 5% (two-sided) significance, with an estimated 40% reduction in PSA screening from baseline in the intervention group and 10% in the control group, the number of participants needed for each group is 38 (total 76). Therefore, a total of 96 GPs in the Klang Valley will be recruited for this study, assuming a non-response rate of 20 GPs.
Intervention:
The intervention consists of two phases.
Phase 1 The research team will develop 3 self-administered, online surveys, with the input of family physicians and urologists. The surveys will capture basic demographic information about the participating GPs (but not any identifiable information), and also their overall knowledge and perception towards prostate cancer screening. In addition, all 3 surveys will also contain 5 clinical vignettes that will relate to prostate cancer screening. After reading the vignettes, the GPs will be asked whether or not they would recommend screening for the particular patient in the given scenario; and should they choose to screen, which screening method they would use (PSA, DRE, or both).
GPs will then be randomised to either receive an online training module (intervention) or none (control).
Phase 2:
Upon successful receipt of the GPs' response to the first survey, a second survey will be sent to all the GPs via email. The participants will once again be invited to read and respond to another set of vignettes of similar nature to those in phase 1.
GPs who have been randomised to the intervention arm will also receive a link in the second email that will enable them to download an online training module. The participants will be asked to view the training module prior to answering the second survey.
GPs in the control group will only receive the second survey and not the training module.
A third and final email will be sent to all the GPs who have successfully answered the second survey, 3 months after the date of receipt of their second survey response. This final survey will likewise, contain five clinical vignettes of similar nature to those of the two previous surveys. The responses of GPs in the intervention group will then be compared before and immediately after the online training video and also 3-months later; as well as to the control group.
Recruitment:
The research team will recruit the GPs from an existing GP database which has been created from previous studies conducted in the Petaling District and Kuala Lumpur. A researcher and a research assistant will be responsible for identifying and recruiting eligible participants. An invitation letter, a study summary, a participant information sheet and consent form will be sent via email to each GP. Consenting participants will be remunerated for their time and effort spent in participating in the study. In the event response is poor, a research assistant may need to arrange an appointment to visit the GPs at their clinics'.
Analysis:
The McNemar test will be used to determine the phase differences in the proportion of GPs who perform screening unnecessarily and the differences between the intervention and control group. Chi square test will be used to compare the difference in proportions between the intervention and control groups. GPs' characteristics associated with unnecessary screening practice will be explored using logistic regression models using phase 1 data. Logistic regression will be used for binary outcomes and the analyses will be adjusted for baseline data. SPSS will be used to manage the data sets
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Lembah Pantai
-
Kuala Lumpur, Lembah Pantai, Malaysia, 59100
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, University of Malaya Medical Centre
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Full time general practitioners in the Klang valley (Petaling district and Kuala Lumpur)
Exclusion Criteria:
- GPs who do not see male patients
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Training module (Intervention)
Responses of GPs in the intervention group will then be compared before and immediately after the online training video and also 3-months later
|
Responses of GPs in the intervention group will then be compared before and immediately after the online training video and also 3-months later; as well as to the control group.
|
No Intervention: No training module (Control)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Evaluation of effectiveness of online training module among general practitioners in prostate cancer screening
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
|
Difference in the change in proportions of appropriate prostate cancer screening from baseline by GPs between intervention (online training module) and control (no online training module) groups.
|
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Post-online training module knowledge in prostate cancer screening
Time Frame: An average of 6 months
|
|
An average of 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Tun Firzara Abdul Malik, University of Malaya
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL 3rd, Buys SS, Chia D, Church TR, Fouad MN, Gelmann EP, Kvale PA, Reding DJ, Weissfeld JL, Yokochi LA, O'Brien B, Clapp JD, Rathmell JM, Riley TL, Hayes RB, Kramer BS, Izmirlian G, Miller AB, Pinsky PF, Prorok PC, Gohagan JK, Berg CD; PLCO Project Team. Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1310-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810696. Epub 2009 Mar 18. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 23;360(17):1797.
- Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S, Nelen V, Kwiatkowski M, Lujan M, Lilja H, Zappa M, Denis LJ, Recker F, Paez A, Maattanen L, Bangma CH, Aus G, Carlsson S, Villers A, Rebillard X, van der Kwast T, Kujala PM, Blijenberg BG, Stenman UH, Huber A, Taari K, Hakama M, Moss SM, de Koning HJ, Auvinen A; ERSPC Investigators. Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 15;366(11):981-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113135. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2137.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- BK070-2016
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer Screening
-
Massachusetts General HospitalAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)CompletedBreast Cancer Screening | Colon Cancer Screening | Prostate Cancer ScreeningUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverCompletedProstate Cancer ScreeningUnited States
-
University College, LondonKing's College London; Imperial College London; Medical Research Council; Cancer...Completed
-
Temple UniversityCompleted
-
Lanxi Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineZhejiang Cancer Hospital; Zhejiang Chinese Medical UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Completed
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityState of MarylandCompleted
-
NYU Langone HealthCenters for Disease Control and PreventionRecruitingCancer ScreeningUnited States
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityUnknown
-
University of ChicagoRecruitingProstate Cancer ScreeningUnited States
Clinical Trials on Online training module
-
University of BirminghamFederico II University; University of Calgary; University of Milan; University...CompletedInflammatory Bowel Diseases | Crohn Disease | Ulcerative Colitis | Polyp of Colon | Crohn Colitis | Dysplasia Colon | Dysplasia, Crohn Disease-AssociatedCanada, United Kingdom, Italy
-
University of MinnesotaCompletedMonkey PoxUnited States
-
NYU Langone HealthRecruiting
-
University of ArkansasCompletedHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeUnited States
-
McMaster UniversityReliq Health Technologies Inc.UnknownPeripheral Artery Disease
-
Assuta Medical CenterCompleted
-
University of TorontoSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Unity Health TorontoCompleted
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Dartmouth CollegeCompletedCancer | Colorectal Cancer | Lung CancerUnited States
-
Emory UniversityCompletedAutism Spectrum Disorder | ElopementUnited States
-
Catharina Ziekenhuis EindhovenUnknownObesity | Telemedicine | Bariatric SurgeryNetherlands