Screen to Save 2: Rural Cancer Screening Educational Intervention

January 15, 2026 updated by: Judith R. Rees, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
The purpose of this study is to help the Dartmouth Cancer Center and the National Cancer Institute understand how to educate people about cancer screening.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The Dartmouth Cancer Center's Community Outreach and Engagement Team will implement Screen to Save 2 using an online format. The education will be based on a set of key messages that cover information about colorectal cancer, including risk factors, prevention, screening recommendations, and screening options. Key messages provided by the National Cancer Institute will be tailored to the local context of NH and VT, including information about local options for getting screened for colorectal cancer.

Using online or telephone surveys, some participants will be contacted approximately three months after their initial participation. Some of the participants contacted after three months will again be contacted another three months later (six months after initial participation). The three- and six-month surveys will assess knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors related to cancer screening, including outcomes from cancer screening.

The primary aim of the study is to implement and evaluate Screen to Save 2 outreach and educational activities to improve knowledge of colorectal cancer screening methods, to increase intent to get screened for colorectal cancer, and connect screening services to the target population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

205

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
        • Dartmouth Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Resident of one of the RUCC 7-9 counties in New Hampshire or Vermont (Coos or Sullivan County, NH; Caledonia, Windsor, Windham, Orange, Orleans, Lamoille, or Essex County, VT) and
  • Age 45-74 at the time of enrollment in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

- Cognitive impairment preventing participation in informed consent process

Three-Month Follow-Up Survey Inclusion Criteria:

A participant will be eligible for inclusion in the three-month follow-up survey if the participant completed the pre-test, educational intervention, and post-test and at the time of initial participation:

  • Answered a colorectal cancer screening history question indicating that the participant has never received colorectal cancer screening OR does not know if he/she has received colorectal cancer screening previously OR
  • Answered a series of questions indicating that the participant received prior colorectal cancer screening but may be overdue for colorectal cancer screening based on the type of colorectal cancer screening last reported and screening guidelines for the frequency of re-screening.

Six-Month Follow-Up Survey Inclusion Criteria:

A participant will be eligible for inclusion in the six-month follow-up survey if the participant participated in the three-month-follow up survey and at that time reported that having:

  • A FIT/FOBT screening or Cologuard (stool) screening performed since the time of initial study participation, but having not received the results
  • An abnormal FIT/FOBT, or Cologuard (stool) screening since the time of initial study participation, but had not received a diagnostic colonoscopy
  • A colonoscopy since the time of initial study participation, but had not received the final results

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Arm 1
Participants who meet eligibility criteria will be able to enroll and participate on-line, with some participating in online or telephone survey follow-up.
Participants will receive online education via a video and website. Key messages will include information on risk factors, prevention, screening recommendations, and screening options pertaining to colorectal cancer. Some participants will be asked to participate in three and/or six-month follow-up surveys administered online or by telephone.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Correct Responses Regarding Knowledge Related to Colorectal Cancer Risk, Prevention, and Screening
Time Frame: pre-test administered immediately before educational intervention; post-test administered immediately after the educational intervention on day 1.
A pre-test and post-test are conducted with participants to assess changes in knowledge related to key learning outcomes expected from the educational intervention (assessed via 14 true/false and multiple-choice questions, reported as a percent change in points). An increased % change in points represents increased knowledge of each survey question and a value of 0 indicates knowledge did not change (a negative value would indicate decreased knowledge). % change is a unique number that was calculated as the difference between the % answering correctly after the intervention minus the % correct before the intervention; it is representative of the entire data set and not calculated on an individual participant level. P values (<0.05) are based on chi-square tests. Each row represents a unique survey question evaluating the topic listed in the row title.
pre-test administered immediately before educational intervention; post-test administered immediately after the educational intervention on day 1.
Change in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Other Risk Behavior Intentions
Time Frame: pre-test administered immediately before educational intervention; post-test administered immediately after educational intervention on day 1
A pre-test and post-test are conducted to assess behavioral intention related to five prevention and screening behaviors (assessed via 5 questions on a 5-point Likert scale: strongly agree (5), agree, unsure, disagree, strongly disagree(1). The values reported represent the difference between pre-intervention and post-intervention scores, calculated as a unique number for the total responding participants (not calculated individually). A positive change represents increased intent. Each row represents a unique survey question evaluating the topic listed in the row title.
pre-test administered immediately before educational intervention; post-test administered immediately after educational intervention on day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in knowledge related to lung cancer risk, prevention, and screening
Time Frame: pre-test administered immediately before educational intervention; post-test administered immediately after educational intervention
A pre-test and post-test are conducted with participants to assess any changes in knowledge related to key learning outcomes expected from the educational intervention (assessed via 6 true/false questions).
pre-test administered immediately before educational intervention; post-test administered immediately after educational intervention
Reach to current and former cigarette smokers
Time Frame: survey administered immediately before educational intervention
Number and percentage of participants who indicate that they have quit smoking cigarettes within the last 15 years and the number and percentage of participants who indicate current tobacco use.
survey administered immediately before educational intervention
Change in tobacco use frequency
Time Frame: survey administered immediately before educational intervention; approximately 3 months after initial participation in study
Participants meeting the inclusion criteria for the three-month follow-up survey will answer a question about their current tobacco use (every day, some day, not at all, decline to answer) and responses will be compared to participants' answers to the same question administered approximately three months earlier before receiving the educational intervention
survey administered immediately before educational intervention; approximately 3 months after initial participation in study
Uptake of lung cancer screening behaviors
Time Frame: approximately 3 months after initial participation in study
Participants meeting the inclusion criteria for the three-month follow-up survey will answer two yes/no/decline to answer questions asked in the three-month follow-up survey regarding lung cancer screening behaviors since their initial participation in the study approximately three months earlier.
approximately 3 months after initial participation in study
Uptake of tobacco quitting behaviors
Time Frame: approximately 3 months after initial participation in study
Participants meeting the inclusion criteria for the three-month follow-up survey will answer four yes/no/decline to answer questions asked in the three-month follow-up survey regarding use of tobacco quitting services and quitting behavior since their initial participation in the study approximately three months earlier.
approximately 3 months after initial participation in study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Judith Rees, BM, BCh, MPH, PhD, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 8, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2026

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Online educational video and website module

Subscribe