A Pragmatic Trial of the Effect of a Mailed Patient Flyer About Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Testing Prior to an Annual Exam

January 24, 2012 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver

A Pragmatic Randomized Trial of the Effect of a Mailed Patient Flyer About PSA Testing Prior to an Annual Exam

  1. Does a one-page American College of Physicians educational flyer about the pros and cons of prostate cancer screening sent to men within two weeks of their scheduled annual health examinations in a general medicine clinic result in a different rate of prostate cancer screening than among men who were not sent the flyer?
  2. Do patients find the flyer useful and understandable?

Context: The use of prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer is controversial because of a lack of evidence that such screening saves lives when applied within a population and because such testing can lead to invasive downstream biopsies and aggressive treatment that is associated with a high risk of permanent side effects (e.g. impotence, incontinence). Almost all professional societies (American Cancer Society, American Urologic Association, American College of Physicians, United States Preventive Services Task Force) advocate that patients receive education and complete an informed decision-making discussion with their medical providers about the pros and cons of the PSA test, as well as their personal preferences, before proceeding with this test. Unfortunately, despite these recommendations, there is seldom sufficient time during clinic visits to achieve this goal.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

303

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 74 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men age 50-74 who were cared for in a general internal medicine clinic
  • had scheduled an annual health exam
  • had not had a PSA test within the previous year

Exclusion Criteria:

  • active cancer diagnosis
  • history of prostate cancer
  • need for PSA surveillance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SCREENING
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
EXPERIMENTAL: PSA flyer
A mailed low-literacy informational patient flyer about the PSA test

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of PSA testing
Time Frame: At the time of the annual exam (within two weeks of their annual physical)
Rate of PSA testing will be determined by reviewing the chart of enrolled patients within two weeks of their annual physical
At the time of the annual exam (within two weeks of their annual physical)
Rate of documented PSA discussions
Time Frame: At the time of the annual exam (within two weeks of their annual physical)
Rate of documented PSA discussions will be determined through chart review within two weeks of the annual physical.
At the time of the annual exam (within two weeks of their annual physical)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Flyer acceptability
Time Frame: Within two weeks of the annual exam
The acceptability of the flyer will be assessed through a follow-up phone interview of patients who had received the flyer.
Within two weeks of the annual exam
Perceived participation
Time Frame: Within two weeks
Perceived participation will be assessed in a follow-up phone interview within two weeks of the annual physical using validated measures of particiption in decision making.
Within two weeks
Prostate Cancer Screening knowledge
Time Frame: Within two weeks
Prostate cancer screening knowledge will be assessed using 5 knowledge questions surrounding PSA testing during a follow-up interview 2 weeks after the annual physical
Within two weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 25, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 25, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2012

Last Verified

January 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer Screening

Clinical Trials on PSA flyer

3
Subscribe