Positive Expiratory Pressure With Blow-bottle Device Versus EPAP After Postoperative Cardiac Surgery

December 6, 2019 updated by: Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

Expiratory Positive Pressure With Blow-bottle Device Versus Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure (EPAP) in Patients After Postoperative Cardiac Surgery: Randomized Clinical Trial

Cardiac surgery is a recommended therapeutic option as a form of secondary prevention for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, but may present postoperative alterations such as reduction of pulmonary volumes and flows, impairment in gas exchange and increase in the rate of pulmonary complications. The use of positive pressure may reduce these complications. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of positive expiratory pressure (PEP) in the blow-bottle device compared to expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP), both associated with conventional physiotherapy, and conventional physiotherapy in the pulmonary function in postoperative cardiac patients through a randomized clinical trial. Methods: The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital de Clínicas of Porto Alegre (CAEE: 70213617.6.0000.5327). Patients undergoing cardiac surgery were randomized into three groups: positive expiratory pressure with blow-bottle device associated with conventional physiotherapy (G1), positive expiratory pressure in the airways with unidirectional valve associated with conventional physiotherapy (G2), and the third group only the conventional physiotherapy of HCPA cardiac intensive care unit (G3). Initially, an evaluation was performed through spirometry, manovacuometry, radiological changes in the preoperative period, prior to the interventions (immediate postoperative) and on the third postoperative day, immediately prior to cardiac intensive care unit discharge. Pulmonary complications were assessed on the third postoperative day, and length of stay (at the Intensive Care Unit and hospital) were recorded untill discharge.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cardiac surgery is a recommended therapeutic option as a form of secondary prevention for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, but may present postoperative alterations such as reduction of pulmonary volumes and flows, impairment in gas exchange and increase in the rate of pulmonary complications. The use of positive pressure may reduce these complications. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of positive expiratory pressure (PEP) in the blow-bottle device compared to expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP), both associated with conventional physiotherapy, and conventional physiotherapy in the pulmonary function in postoperative cardiac patients. Methods:This is a randomized clinical trial, with patients in postoperative cardiac surgery. On the first day of postoperative, the patients will be randomized into three groups: 1 group that will receive positive expiratory pressure with blow-bottle device associated with conventional physiotherapy; 2- group that will receive positive expiratory pressure in the airways with valve unidirectional therapy associated with conventional physiotherapy; 3- group that will only receive conventional physiotherapy. The intervention of the positive expiratory pressure with blow-bottle device group will consist of exercise with a blow-bottle device of 10 cm high; the positive expiratory pressure in the airways group, exercise with unidirectional positive expiratory pressure valve (10cmH2O). Both the groups will perform three sets of 10 repetitions per day, by the third day of PO. The third group will receive conventional physiotherapy of intensive care unit. The outcomes evaluated will be: pulmonary function (primary), respiratory muscle strength, pulmonary complications, radiological changes and length of stay (at the Intensive CareUnit - ICU - and hospital). Assessment of pulmonary function, muscle strength and radiological changes will be performed in the preoperative period, prior to the interventions and on the third postoperative day, immediately prior to discharge of cardiac intensive care unit. Pulmonary complications and ICU length of stay will be recorded after discharge from intensive care unit cardiac. The length of hospital stay was recorded after hospital discharge.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

163

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rio Grande Do Sul
      • Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil, 90.035-903
        • HCPA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Elective cardiovascular surgery of:

coronary artery bypass graft surgery alone

coronary artery bypass graft surgery combined with aortic valve surgery

coronary artery bypass graft surgery combined with bicuspid valve surgery

coronary artery bypass graft surgery combined with tricuspid valve surgery

Aortic valve surgery

Bicuspid valve surgery

Tricuspid valve surgery

All on spontaneous ventilation or with supplemental oxygen support.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with hemodynamic instability (heart rate> 120bpm, clinically important hypotension - vasopressor dose ≥ 0.1mcg / kg / min)

Cardiac arrhythmia

Heart transplantation

Angina at rest and/or minor efforts

Mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours

Re-hospitalized patients with decompensated heart failure

Noninvasive mechanical ventilation

Non-collaborative and with cognitive inability to understand the procedures

Reintubated patients

Re-operated patients

In order to perform the pulmonary function test, patients may not present the following contraindications:

hemoptysis

recent angina

retinal detachment

hypertensive crisis

pulmonary edema

thoracic aortic aneurysm

In order to perform the respiratory muscle strength test, patients may not present the following contraindications:

acute myocardial infarction

recent unstable angina

severe and uncontrolled systemic arterial hypertension

aortic aneurysm

pneumothorax

pleurocutaneous or pulmonary fistulas

surgery or recent trauma to the upper airways, chest or abdomen

abdominal hernia

acute middle ear problems

glaucoma or retinal detachment

hydrocephalus

meningocele

neurological processes that favor the choking of tonsils

general state of physical or mental impairment that impedes the patient's collaboration.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: PEP in a blow-bottle device
Blow-bottle device of 10cmH2O.
A 500-milliliter enteral nutrition vial will be used, which will contain a hole in the side, where two silicone tubes of 20 centimeters long will be inserted together with tape on the bottleneck of the vial. To perform the exercise, the vial will be filled with water leaving a water column of 10 cm high. Deep inspirations will be requested at a volume greater than the tidal volume and less than the total lung capacity that can be performed via nasal or oral, then with the mouth connected to the extensors, the patient will exhale slowly, avoiding to totally empty the lungs. The protocol will be executed twice a day, three sets of ten repetitions. The group will receive the conventional physiotherapy of the cardiac intensive care unit of the HCPA.
Active Comparator: EPAP Positive airway expiratory pressure
EPAP with pressure of 10 cmH2O.
The Vital Signs ® EPAP kit will be used. Exercises will be performed in the bed, and as soon as the patient is released by the medical team to leave the bed, they can be performed in the sitting position or in orthostasis. For performing the exercise, the EPAP mask will be connected to the face of the patient. The expiratory pressure will be adjusted to 10cmH2O. Deep inspirations will be requested at a volume greater than the tidal volume and below the total lung capacity, then the patient will exhale slowly. The protocol will be executed twice a day, three sets of ten repetitions. The group will receive the conventional physiotherapy of the cardiac intensive care unit of the HCPA, as described in the conventional physiotherapy group.
Sham Comparator: conventional physiotherapy
Ventilatory exercises, bronchial hygiene techniques, exercises for upper and lower limbs (previous motor condition) stretching, orientation and walking.
Conventional physical therapy consists of ventilatory exercises, bronchial hygiene techniques, passive, active-assisted or active exercises for upper and lower limbs, and resisted lower limb exercises; stretching, cough and walking guidelines. Initially the exercises will be performed in the bed, as soon as this is withdrawn and the patient is released by the medical team to leave the bed, the progression of the exercises to be performed in the sitting position, orthostasis, and ambulation is performed, this usually occurs on the 2nd postoperative day, after the removal of the mediastinal drain . Under supervision of the physiotherapist, the protocol will be performed twice daily, two sets of ten repetitions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pulmonary function - forced vital capacity
Time Frame: three days
Pulmonary function through spirometry. Spirometry allows to measure forced vital capacity. It's the air volume expired, quickly, after an inspiration deep maximum.
three days
Pulmonary function - forced expiratory volume in the first second
Time Frame: three days
Pulmonary function through spirometry, that allows to measure forced expiratory volume in the first second. It's the maximum expired volume at the first second of an maximum expiration .
three days
Pulmonary function - the ratio: forced expiratory volume in the first second / forced vital capacity
Time Frame: three days
Pulmonary function through spirometry, obtained through forced maneuver (forced vital capacity) and forced expiratory volume in the first second - represents the maximum expired volume at the first second of an maximum expiration.
three days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Respiratory muscle strength - maximum expiratory pressure
Time Frame: three days
Performed through a manometer in step cmH2O, of the brand Globalmed model MV300. Maximum expiratory pressure.
three days
Respiratory muscle strength - maximal inspiratory pressure
Time Frame: three days
Performed through a manometer in step cmH2O, of the brand Globalmed model MV300. Maximal inspiratory pressure will be measured.
three days
Pulmonary complications - atelectasis
Time Frame: three days
According to the definitions of the European Journal of Anaesthesiology
three days
Pulmonary complications - pleural effusion
Time Frame: three days
According to the definitions of the European Journal of Anaesthesiology
three days
Pulmonary complications - pneumothorax
Time Frame: three days
According to the definitions of the European Journal of Anaesthesiology
three days
Pulmonary complications - pneumonia
Time Frame: three days
According to the definitions of the European Journal of Anaesthesiology
three days
Pulmonary complications - respiratory infection
Time Frame: three days
According to the definitions of the European Journal of Anaesthesiology
three days
Pulmonary complications - respiratory failure
Time Frame: three days
According to the definitions of the European Journal of Anaesthesiology
three days
Radiological changes - pleural effusion
Time Frame: three days
rated on chest X-ray, according to the scale proposed by Staton et al.
three days
Radiological changes - atelectasis
Time Frame: three days
rated on chest X-ray, according to the scale proposed by Staton et al.
three days
Radiological changes - consolidation
Time Frame: three days
rated on chest X-ray, according to the scale proposed by Staton et al.
three days
Radiological changes - pneumothorax
Time Frame: three days
rated on chest X-ray, according to the scale proposed by Staton et al.
three days
Radiological changes - pulmonary edema
Time Frame: three days
rated on chest X-ray, according to the scale proposed by Staton et al.
three days
Length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay
Time Frame: three days
Length of ICU stay (days) search electronic records
three days
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: up to 25 days
Length of hospital stay (days) search electronic records
up to 25 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Graciele Sbruzzi, doctor, HCPA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 20, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 23, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 17-0460

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe