Photo-Activated Disinfection Versus Triple-Antibiotic Paste for Management of Necrotic Young Permanent Anterior Teeth

December 4, 2018 updated by: ElShaimaa Abdelhafiz Abdelrahim, Cairo University

Evaluation of Post-Operative Pain After Regenerative Endodontic Using Photo-Activated Oral Disinfection Versus Triple-Antibiotic Paste for Management of Necrotic Young Permanent Anterior Teeth

This study aims to compare regenerative endodontics for necrotic young permanent anterior teeth using oral photo-activated disinfection versus triple antibiotic paste in terms of:

  1. Clinical success in terms of absence of any complication such as spontaneous pain, sinus or swelling.
  2. Radiographic success in terms of healing of periapical radiolucency or increase root thickness, length or apical closure.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Disinfection of the root canal system is thought to be critical to the success of Regenerative Endodontic Procedures (REPs) as infection prevents regeneration, repair and stem cell activity . A suitable material for using as intra-canal medicament seems to be antibiotic. Triple antibiotic paste (TAP) containing metronidazole, ciprofloxacin and minocycline has been reported to be a successful regimen in controlling the root canal pathogen and in managing necrotic young permanent tooth .

Recently, new disinfection methods have been developed to overcome the limitations of conventional disinfecting protocols that they may neither reduce the number of bacteria to a satisfactory level nor minimize the toxicity to periapical stem/progenitors . Other concerns regarding the use of TAP are tooth discoloration after treatment and bacterial resistance. Photo-activated oral disinfection is a novel disinfection method which present a great solution for the problem associated with triple antibiotic paste

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 9 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy children with no physical, mental or systemic conditions.
  • Developmental age of the child is the most important factor so periapical x- ray will be taken first to assure apex immaturity.
  • No sex predilection.
  • Restorable necrotic young permanent anterior teeth

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Root fracture.
  • Internal or external root resorption.
  • Parents or guardians refuse to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Photo Activated Disinfection
Photoactivated disinfection (PAD) is based on the interaction of a photosensitive antibacterial agent and a light source. It uses a nontoxic dye [named photosensitizer PS] and low-intensity visible light. In oxygen presentation, these combine to produce some cytotoxic species. The PS molecules attach to bacteria membrane
Photoactivated disinfection (PAD) is based on the interaction of a photosensitive antibacterial agent and a light source. It uses a nontoxic dye [named photosensitizer PS] and low-intensity visible light. In oxygen presentation, these combine to produce some cytotoxic species. The PS molecules attach to bacteria membrane
Other Names:
  • Photodynamic therapy (PDT)
Active Comparator: Antibiotic paste
Hoshino et al. recommended a ratio of 1:1:1 of metronidazole (500 mg), minocycline (100 mg) and ciprofloxacin (200 mg) for the 3Mix formulation
An antibiotic mixture composed of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, and minocycline, known as triple antibiotic paste (TAP) or "3mix", has been the most widely used medicament, This goes back to the studies by Hoshino et al.1996
Other Names:
  • Triple antibiotic paste

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
absence of postoperative pain
Time Frame: immediate post operative
binary question by asking patients (yes or no)
immediate post operative
absence of postoperative pain
Time Frame: at 3 months follow up
binary question by asking patients (yes or no)
at 3 months follow up
absence of postoperative pain
Time Frame: at 6 months follow up
binary question by asking patients (yes or no)
at 6 months follow up
absence of postoperative pain
Time Frame: at 9 months follow up
binary question by asking patients (yes or no)
at 9 months follow up
absence of postoperative pain
Time Frame: at 12 months follow up
binary question by asking patients (yes or no)
at 12 months follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
healing of sinus
Time Frame: immediate post operative, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
Clinical success in term of absence of sinus (Yes or No)
immediate post operative, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
healing of swelling
Time Frame: immediate post operative, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
Clinical success in term of absence of swelling (Yes or No)
immediate post operative, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
healing of periapical radiolucency
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Radiographic success in term of healing of periapical or radiolucency (Yes or No)
baseline, 6 months, 12 months
change in root length
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Radiographic evaluation by calibration of root length in millimetre by Digora
baseline, 6 months, 12 months
change in dentin root thickness
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Radiographic evaluation by calibration of root thickness in millimetre by Digora
baseline, 6 months, 12 months
change in apical diameter
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Radiographic evaluation by calibration of apical diameter in millimetre by Digora
baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 15, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 15, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulp Necrosis

Clinical Trials on Photo Activated Disinfection

Subscribe