Research on the Impact of Targeted Subsidies Within Open Defecation Free (ODF) Communities

October 1, 2021 updated by: The Aquaya Institute
This study evaluates targeted subsidies as a strategy to improve sanitation infrastructure and behaviours in communities that have reached Open Defecation Free (ODF) status after a Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) program. The investigator's hypothesis is that sanitation subsidies targeted at the most vulnerable households within ODF communities will increase and help sustain latrine coverage, quality, and use amongst the targeted households, and through a spill-over effect, amongst the rest of the community. Half of participating communities will receive the targeted subsidy, while the other half will not receive any treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) is a widely used approach to eradicate open defecation in rural communities in developing countries. Using emotional triggers, CLTS promotes community self-help to build household latrines. In Ghana, where CLTS is part of the government's official sanitation strategy, a community is declared "Open Defecation Free" (ODF) when 80 percent of households own a latrine.

There is however evidence that open defecation persists in so-called "ODF" communities, especially as the most vulnerable households (the poorest of the poor) cannot afford to construct or maintain durable latrines. As a result, subsidies for these vulnerable households have been proposed as a strategy to promote the construction of durable latrines and help sustain safe sanitation behaviours in communities having received CLTS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5615

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tamale, Ghana
        • Districts of Tatale and Kpandai, Northern Region

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

This study is a cluster randomized controlled trial that will enroll entire communities. Within a community, only specific households will be selected to receive sanitation subsidy vouchers. Outcomes will be measured both for voucher recipients and for the rest of the community.

Inclusion Criteria (for Communities):

  • Community was targeted by UNICEF's Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) program in Tatale, Yendi, and Kpandai districts in Ghana.
  • Community has Open Defecation Free (ODF) status according to local authorities.
  • Community has more than 15 and less than 100 households.

Exclusion Criteria (for Communities):

  • Community is located less than 2 kilometers away from a community in the opposite treatment arm.

Inclusion Criteria (for voucher recipients within study communities):

  • Household is extremely poor, as identified through community consultation and/or the government's Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) program.
  • Household has at least one vulnerable person, i.e. who meets one of the following criteria: i) older than 65 years old, ii) person with a disability, iii) orphan or vulnerable child, iv) female head of household, v) widow(er), vi) terminally-ill persons, vii) unemployed, viii) outcast groups.

Exclusion Criteria (for voucher recipients within study communities):

  • Household owns a functional, individual (non-shared) latrine with durable sub-structure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Targeted Subsidy
In these communities, households identified as vulnerable receive a voucher for a free latrine sub-structure (slab + pit lining), redeemable with local sanitation suppliers.
Voucher
No Intervention: No subsidy
In these communities, no household receives a voucher.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of households owning an individual, functional latrine with full superstructure
Time Frame: Approximately 18 months
Household ownership (yes/no) of a latrine that is i) not shared with other households ("individual"), ii) whose pit is not collapsed and not full ("functional"), and iii) with four walls (or circular walls) and a roof of any materials ("full superstructure").
Approximately 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of households reporting practicing open defecation
Time Frame: Approximately 18 months
Self report by the respondent of not always using a toilet to defecate when at home.
Approximately 18 months
Percentage of households owning an individual, functional latrine with full superstructure and durable superstructure
Time Frame: Approximately 18 months
Household ownership (yes/no) of a latrine that is i) not shared with other households ("individual"), ii) whose pit is not collapsed and not full ("functional"), iii) with four walls (or circular walls) and a roof of any materials ("full superstructure"), iv) with a concrete/plastic slab and pit lining with plastic/rocks/bricks/concrete ("durable substructure").
Approximately 18 months
Percentage of households reporting satisfaction with latrine
Time Frame: Approximately 18 months
Self report by the respondent of being satisfied with the latrine (s)he uses for defecation.
Approximately 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rachel Peletz, PhD, The Aquaya Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 18, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • WASHPaLS Subsidy Study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data for the primary and all secondary outcome measures as well as key confounders (demographics, wealth index, community characteristics) will be made available.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available within 9 months of study completion.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sanitation

Clinical Trials on Targeted Subsidy

Subscribe