Brain Stimulation and Cognitive Training in Healthy Older Adults (TrainStim)

April 30, 2021 updated by: University Medicine Greifswald

tDCS-accompanied Cognitive Training Effects in Healthy Older Adults - Randomised, Sham Controlled, Interventional Study

The aim of this study is to investigate whether a tDCS-accompanied intensive cognitive training of working memory leads to performance improvement in healthy older individuals.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The goal of the present study is to assess behavioral (primary) and neural effects of a multi-session cognitive training combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Many studies to date have found tDCS to be an efficient method to enhance various cognitive functions by modulating cortical excitability in young adults, but its behavioral impact and underlying mechanisms in aging still need to be elucidated. Healthy older adults will participate in a three-week cognitive training with concurrent online tDCS application. Cognitive performance (primary), as well as structural and functional imaging data will be examined before, during and after the intervention. In order to draw conclusions about the effect of tDCS in addition to cognitive training, a control group, receiving sham stimulation during training, will be assessed. Furthermore, to assess neural correlates of performance improvement, functional and structural parameters will be measured with MRI before and after training. Follow-up sessions to assess long-term effects are planned four weeks and six months after the post assessment. The results of the study will offer valuable insights into efficacy of combined tDCS and cognitive training, as compared to training alone, in older adults. Moreover, improved understanding of tDCS effects on cognitive training performance and underlying neural correlates may help to develop novel approaches for cognitive decline in healthy and pathological aging.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Greifswald, Germany, 17475
        • University Medicine Greifswald

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 80 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older adults (65 - 80 years);
  • Right handedness;
  • Unobtrusive neuropsychological screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia; other neurodegenerative neurological disorders; epilepsy; previous stroke;
  • Severe and untreated medical conditions that precludes participation in the training, as determined by responsible physician;
  • History of severe alcoholism or use of drugs;
  • Severe psychiatric disorders such as depression (if not in remission) or psychosis;
  • Contraindication for MRI (claustrophobia, metallic implants, ferromagnetic metals in the body, disorders of thermoregulation, pregnant women)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: sham group
Sham tDCS + intensive cognitive Training
Intensive cognitive training of a letter memory updating task and a 3-stage Markov decision making task, 9 sessions
Experimental: stimulation group
Anodal tDCS + intensive cognitive Training
Intensive cognitive training of a letter memory updating task and a 3-stage Markov decision making task, 9 sessions
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), 9 sessions with 20 minutes stimulation each (current intensity of 1mA)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Working memory training performance (Letter Updating task)
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Performance in a memory training task (Letter updating) under anodal tDCS compared to sham condition;operationalized by working Memory Updating performance assessed with number of correctly recalled letter lists in the letter updating task, analyzed immediately after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
3 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Working memory training performance (Markov task)
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Performance in second memory training task (Markov decision making) under anodal tDCS compared to sham condition, analyzed immediately after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
3 weeks
Transfer outcomes
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Performance in cognitive transfer tasks, comparing performance immediately before and after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
3 weeks
Long-term outcomes
Time Frame: 4 weeks after training, 6 months after 4-week follow-up
Long-term performance in training and transfer tasks, comparing performance immediately before and after training period with performance at 4 weeks and 6-months after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
4 weeks after training, 6 months after 4-week follow-up
Neural correlates
Time Frame: 3 weeks, 6 months
Structural and functional neural correlates of the intervention, as measured by structural, functional resting-state and diffusion weighted MRI, immediately before and after the intervention and 6 months after follow-up (anodal condition versus sham)
3 weeks, 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Agnes Flöel, Prof., University Medicine Greifswald

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 25, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TrainStim3

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aging

Clinical Trials on Intensive cognitive training

Subscribe