Intraoperative Electron Radiotherapy for Low-risk Early Breast Cancer (COSMOPOLITAN)

January 4, 2024 updated by: Juergen Debus, University Hospital Heidelberg

Breast cancer is the most frequent malignancy in women. Standard therapy for early-stage breast cancer is breast conserving surgery (BCS) followed by adjuvant whole breast irradiation (WBI), which usually requires a treatment time of 3-6 weeks. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated that postoperative WBI after BCS significantly decreased the risk of local (in-breast) recurrence and improved breast cancer mortality as well as survival. However, one of the most common side-effects of radiotherapy is fatigue, which is reported in up to 80% of cancer patients during treatment. Especially in early-stage breast cancer patients it might be the only serious side-effect following adjuvant irradiation, as fatigue often significantly reduces quality of life due to resulting functional impairment and psychological distress. Fatigue additionally has a distinct socioeconomic impact: 75% of patients and 40% of caregivers are forced to change their employment status due to cancer-related fatigue.

For reducing treatment-related toxicity, several RCTs consequently addressed the question whether adjuvant WBI could be omitted in early-stage, low risk breast cancer patients treated with endocrine therapy. However, all these trials detected up to seven-time increased local recurrence rates without WBI following BCS. Both, longer duration of radiotherapy and larger radiation field sizes are known to be associated with increase in treatment-related fatigue. Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), delivered exclusively to the original tumor location and not to the surrounding breast tissue, might therefore be an alternative treatment option with fewer side-effects for early-stage, low risk breast cancer patients. Few previous trials have already reported comparable outcomes for highly selected low-risk breast cancer patients for APBI compared to conventional WBI. First results also point out that APBI compared to WBI might be associated with less severity and intensity of fatigue.

One method for APBI is single-dose intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) delivered directly to the tumor after resection. Data is still limited for APBI, hence current international and German guidelines suggest the use of APBI for low-risk early stage breast cancer patients but recommend the application of APBI preferably within a clinical trial.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

202

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer
  • Total tumor size < 2.5 cm
  • cN0
  • estrogen receptor positive, HER2-receptor negative on immunohistochemistry
  • age >= 50 years
  • ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) Performance status ≤ 2
  • Ability of subject to understand character and individual consequences of the clinical trial
  • Written informed consent (must be available before enrolment in the trial)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • G3
  • Extensive microcalcifications
  • Invasive lobular carcinoma
  • Clinically involved lymph nodes
  • No invasive axillary lymph node staging planned
  • Patients with significant mental or physical comorbidities that preclude regular follow-up
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant endocrine therapy
  • previous radiotherapy of the breast
  • Known carcinoma < 5 years ago (excluding Carcinoma in situ of the cervix, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin) requiring immediate treatment interfering with study therapy
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Participation in another competing clinical study or observation period of competing trials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: BCS + WBI
breast conserving surgery followed by whole breast irradiation
hypofractionated WBI Total dose 40.05 Gy (15 x 2.67 Gy)
Other Names:
  • WBI
Experimental: BCS + IORT
Breast conserving surgery incl intraoperative radiotherapy
IORT with 21 Gy prescribed to the 90% isodose line
Other Names:
  • IORT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Assessment of fatigue from baseline (before treatment start) compared to 12 weeks after treatment start as assessed by the FACIT (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy) Fatigue Assessment Questionnaire. Scale ranges from 0 (no fatigue) to 52 (maximum fatigue).
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue 5 weeks, 6 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment start
Time Frame: 5 weeks, 6 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment start
Assessment of fatigue from baseline (before treatment start) compared to 5 weeks, 6 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment start as assessed by the FACIT Fatigue. Scale ranges from 0 (no fatigue) to 52 (maximum fatigue).Assessment Questionnaire.
5 weeks, 6 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment start
Local tumor control in the index quadrant of the breast
Time Frame: 2 years and 5 years after treatment start

Local tumor control in the index quadrant of the ipsilateral breast as a secondary endpoint is defined as no tumor relapse in the breast tissue quadrant of the initial tumor/ at the site of surgical intervention. Local tumor control in the index quadrant of the ipsilateral breast is used as an additional secondary endpoint to distinguish between true local recurrences in the index quadrant from second (or new) ipsilateral carcinomas in other quadrants. In the intraoperative study arm (arm B) only the former tumor bed is irradiated, while in study arm A the whole breast tissue is irradiated.

Local tumor control in the index quadrant of the breast is taken as number of days from randomization until local tumor progression, death without prior local progression, or end of follow-up. For patients alive and not diagnosed with local progression at the end of the study, the local control time will be censored at the time of the last study visit.

2 years and 5 years after treatment start
Local tumor control in the ipsilateral breast
Time Frame: 2 years and 5 years after treatment start

Local tumor control in the ipsilateral breast as a secondary endpoint is defined as no tumor relapse in the whole ipsilateral breast tissue. Local tumor control in the ipsilateral breast is taken as number of days from randomization until local tumor progression, death without prior local progression, or end of follow-up. For patients alive and not diagnosed with local progression at the end of the study, the local control time will be censored at the time of the last study visit.

Local tumor control in the index quadrant of the breast is taken as number of days from randomization until local tumor progression, death without prior local progression, or end of follow-up. For patients alive and not diagnosed with local progression at the end of the study, the local control time will be censored at the time of the last study visit.

2 years and 5 years after treatment start
Quality of life employing EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) Quality of life questionnaires (QLQ)-C30
Time Frame: 5 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment start
QoL will be analyzed with the help of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Scores are interpreted according to the guidelines of the EORTC Scoring Manual.
5 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment start
Quality of life employing BREAST-Q questionnaire
Time Frame: 5 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment start
The BREAST-Q questionnaire is specifically designed for patients undergoing BCS measuring quality-of-life (QOL) and satisfaction. Patients are asked to rate each item question on a four-point scale. The BREAST-Q is separated into a pre- and post-surgery version.
5 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment start
Quality of life employing BCTOS (Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale) questionnaire
Time Frame: 5 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment start
The Breast Cancer Treatment outcome scale (BCTOS-12) contains 12 items, which are assigned to two internally consistent subscales: 1) Functional Status, 2) Aesthetic Status. Patients are instructed to rate each item of the BCTOS-12 on a four-point scale evaluating the differences between the treated and the untreated breast (1 = no difference, 4 = large difference). The score for each subscale is the mean of the ratings over all items belonging to that subscale. A higher score reflects a poorer status (i.e. a larger difference between the treated and the untreated breast).
5 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 2 years, 5 years after treatment start
distant tumor control
Time Frame: 2 years and 5 years after treatment start
Distant tumor control is defined as no occurrence of distant metastases (lymph node metastases in the axilla, supraclavicular fossa and internal mammary chain are not classified as distant metastases, see above). Distant tumor control is defined as number of days from randomization until occurrence of distant metastases, death without prior distant progression, or end of follow-up. For patients alive and not diagnosed with distant progression at the end of the study, the distant tumor control time will be censored at the time of the last study visit.
2 years and 5 years after treatment start
Overall survival
Time Frame: 2 years and 5 years after treatment start
Overall survival time, defined as number of days from randomization until death or end of follow-up. For patients alive at the end of the study, the overall survival time will be censored at the time of the last visit or follow-up contact.
2 years and 5 years after treatment start
Disease-free survival
Time Frame: 2 years and 5 years after treatment start
Disease-free survival, defined as number of days from randomization until the first occurrence of local recurrence, regional lymph node metastases, distant metastases, tumor-related death, death without prior progression, or end of follow-up. For patients alive and not diagnosed with progression at the end of the study, the disease-free survival time will be censored at the time the patient was last known to be free of progression of tumor disease.
2 years and 5 years after treatment start
Secondary malignancies
Time Frame: 2 years and 5 years after treatment start
Frequency of secondary malignancies after 2 and 5 years will be assessed
2 years and 5 years after treatment start
Acute toxicity
Time Frame: 5 weeks after treatment start
Detailed acute potentially therapy-related toxicity will be assessed during each follow-up visit and documentation of side-effects with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/ European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring System Schema. Documentation of toxicity will mainly focus on breast shrinkage/distortion, breast induration/ fibrosis, change of skin appearance, telangiectasia, breast oedema, numbness, fat necrosis and local pain.
5 weeks after treatment start
Chronic toxicity
Time Frame: 6 months, 2 years and 5 years after treatment start
Detailed chronic potentially therapy-related toxicity will be assessed during each follow-up visit and documentation of side-effects with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/ European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring System Schema. Documentation of toxicity will mainly focus on breast shrinkage/distortion, breast induration/ fibrosis, change of skin appearance, telangiectasia, breast oedema, numbness, fat necrosis and local pain.
6 months, 2 years and 5 years after treatment start
Cosmesis
Time Frame: 5 weeks, 12 weeks, 2 years, 5 years after treatment start
Photographic assessments before and after BCS will be taken at baseline and during follow up visits. Evaluation of breast cosmesis will be performed according to the proposed method by Vrieling et al (Schmidt ME, Chang-Claude J, Vrieling A, et al. Fatigue and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: temporal courses and long-term pattern. Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice 2012;6:11-19.)
5 weeks, 12 weeks, 2 years, 5 years after treatment start
Regional tumor control
Time Frame: 2 years and 5 years after treatment start
Regional tumor control is regarded as no occurrence of regional lymph node metastases (axilla, supraclavicular fossa, internal mammary chain). Regional tumor control is defined as number of days from randomization until occurrence of regional lymph node metastases, death without prior regional tumor progression, or end of follow-up. For patients alive and not diagnosed with regional progression at the end of the study, the regional tumor control time will be censored at the time of the last study visit.
2 years and 5 years after treatment start

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Explorative Endpoint
Time Frame: after surgery
Gene expression analysis using the Prosigna/ PAM (Prediction-Analysis-of-Microarray) 50-assay The Prosigna/PAM50-assay will be applied on the operatively resected tumor tissue according to manufactor's instructions
after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • COSMOPOLITAN

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on whole breast irradiation

3
Subscribe