Feasibility and Performance of a Novel 3D Virtual Treatment Planning Software: an International, Multi-centric, Prospective Study (3D IPSCD-TIM)

June 13, 2019 updated by: Gwen Swennen, AZ Sint-Jan AV

Background Three-dimensional (3D) imaging and subsequent 3D virtual treatment planning are becoming state of the art in orthognathic surgery. However, current available software is still too time-consuming. KLS Martin (Tuttlingen, Germany) has currently completed the preclinical and the single surgeon (GS) closed beta-phase of their novel 3D virtual planning software, IPS (Individual Patient Solutions) CaseDesigner (IPSCD).

Objectives The investigators aim to test pre-release versions of the IPSCD software under real-world working conditions in strictly selected university, general and private hospital settings. In specific, they aim to demonstrate that the IPSCD will ensure a significant reduction in treatment planning time.

Study design closed beta-phase; international, multi-centric, prospective study Patients presenting at the division of maxillofacial surgery at the different hospital centers, for an orthognathic-related problem will receive a complete routine work-up, including a cone-beam CT (CBCT) according to the IPSCD protocol. The same surgeon and/or orthodontist will run all the virtual planning steps with the novel software. Timing of the eight major steps will be measured with a digital chronometer.

One hundred and eight patient cases will be planned with the IPSCD software in the participating centers over a period of three months, in the order of respectively one, three and five cases per month per participating center.

Investigators will register anonymized patient demographics (age, gender, clinical diagnosis, type of surgery), and provide feedback regarding the required time to complete the different surgical planning steps, regarding the number of failed alignments, and the occurrence of software bugs. Intergroup comparison of virtual planning time between the different centers will be analyzed. In addition, the learning effect will be examined through comparison of the different cases planned by the same surgeon and/or orthodontist, or in comparison to the initial beta-testing phase results by GS.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

69

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All consecutive patients who present themselves at the division of Maxillofacial surgery or Orthodontics, at the participating hospital centers for orthognathic surgery between May and August 2016

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of all ages
  • Patients of both genders
  • Patients should present themselves at the division of Maxillofacial surgery or Orthodontics, at the participating hospital centers for orthognathic surgery
  • Patients should receive standardized cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image acquisition, according to the IPSCD protocol
  • Preoperative 3D virtual planning should be performed by the same investigator per center with the IPSCD software

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All patients that do not fit the abovementioned description
  • Patients with posttraumatic deformity
  • Patients with congenital deformity
  • Patients with pre-prosthetic indication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
required time to complete total 3D virtual planning
Time Frame: preoperative
required time to complete total 3D virtual planning, measured in seconds with a digital chronometer
preoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
required time to complete the 8 major virtual planning steps
Time Frame: preoperative
required time to complete the 8 major virtual planning steps, measured in seconds with a digital chronometer
preoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Orthognathic Surgery

3
Subscribe