Evaluation of MRI Sequences for Ultra-rapid Acquisition of Bile Ducts Images (BiliFast)

March 28, 2022 updated by: IHU Strasbourg

The Institute of Imaged-Guided Surgery (IHU Strasbourg) has two clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanners, one with a 3T (3 Teslas) magnetic field used for diagnosis, the other with a magnetic field of 1,5T (1,5 Teslas) used for the interventional (Pre / per / postoperative).

The reference for the visualization of the biliary and pancreatic ducts is a relatively long sequence that needs a breathing-synchronized acquisition leading to artefacts on the images (blur effect).

In order to reduce and/or standardize the acquisition time as well as to limit artefacts, accelerated sequences are developed. Such sequence is available in France recently in the form of WIP Siemens (Work In Progress: sequence in test phase at manufacturer to be marketed in the short or medium term on clinical machines). It incorporates a Compressed Sensing (CS) acquisition scheme allowing the acquisition of a 3D (3 dimensions) sequence similar to the usual sequence by drastically reducing the acquisition time, the sequence CS-SPACE. This sequence exists in two forms:

  • An ultra-rapid sequence acquired in apnea
  • An accelerated sequence but remaining synchronized with the breath. The study carried out here on a large number of patients, with two different magnetic fields, applied routinely for diagnosis or anticipation of surgery, could be used by the community of radiologists, hepatogastroenterologists and also digestive surgeons Hepatobiliary.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Institute of Imaged-Guided Surgery (IHU Strasbourg) has two clinical MRIs, one with a 3T (Teslas) magnetic field used for diagnosis, the other with a magnetic field of 1,5T (Teslas) used for the interventional (Pre / per / postoperative).

Cholangiopancreatography by MRI (or bili-MRI) accounts for about 25% of MRI examinations at the IHU and is used for the diagnosis of pathologies affecting the bile ducts (lithiasis pathology, cholangitis, tumoral pathology of the bile ducts) and the pancreas (search for a causal pathology to pancreatitis (calculus), ductal pathology, ductal study in tumor pathology). It can be done in preoperative context (cholecystectomy) for research of an associated calculus in the bile ducts, or for an anatomical analysis of the bile ducts (possible anatomical variants ...).

The reference for the visualization of the biliary and pancreatic ducts is a very heavily weighted T2 3D SPACE sequence. A 3D volume is obtained in which they appear in white, and the projection of this volume makes it possible to visualize the entire tract. This sequence is relatively long and needs a breathing-synchronized acquisition. The time of acquisition is then very variable from one patient to another (4 to 8 minutes). This extended acquisition time in addition to the variability of rhythm and respiratory profile can lead to artefacts on the images (blur effect). These are the limits of the respiratory synchronization that triggers acquisition by referring to the position of the liver dome which is not perfectly reproducible from a breathing cycle to the other, potentially degrading the appearance of the bile ducts and the reliability of the diagnosis.

A solution that makes it possible to reduce and / or standardize the acquisition time as well as to limit artefacts is to use an accelerated sequence. Such a sequence is available in France recently in the form of WIP Siemens (Work In Progress: sequence in test phase at manufacturer to be marketed in the short or medium term on clinical machines). It incorporates a Compressed Sensing (CS) acquisition scheme allowing the acquisition of a 3D sequence similar to the usual sequence by drastically reducing the acquisition time, the sequence CS-SPACE. This sequence exists in two forms:

  • An ultra-rapid sequence acquired in apnea
  • An accelerated sequence but remaining synchronized with the breath. This sequence has been shown to provide comparable, if not better, results to those obtained with the usual sequence in terms of image quality and visualization of structures, but these results were only obtained at 3T and for a reduced cohort of patients.

A lot of work is done today in the field of MRI to reduce the time of sequence acquisition. Accelerated acquisition schemes like Compressed Sensing remain marginal but are set to become the norm in the long term. The use of the sequence CS-SPACE at the IHU therefore enters into this perspective of reducing examination times.

The study carried out here on a large number of patients, with two different magnetic fields, applied routinely for diagnosis or anticipation of surgery, could be used by the community of radiologists, hepatogastroenterologists and also digestive surgeons Hepatobiliary.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Strasbourg, France, 67 091
        • Service de Radiologie et d'Echographie, NHC Strasbourg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female over 18 years old
  2. Patient for whom MRI is required for the diagnosis or follow-up of a pathology
  3. Patient able to receive and understand information related to the study and give written informed consent
  4. Patient affiliated to the French social security system

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient with contraindications to MRI:

    • pacemaker or automatic defibrillator, pump
    • implanted
    • auditory, anal, painkiller neurostimulator, etc ...
    • ferromagnetic bodies in soft tissues, body
    • intraocular foreigners, cerebrovascular clips
    • claustrophobia
  2. Patient presenting, in the judgment of the investigator, an illness that may prevent participation in the procedures provided by the study
  3. Patient who has been operated urgently
  4. Pregnant or lactating patient
  5. Patient in exclusion period (determined by a previous or a current study)
  6. Patient under the protection of justice
  7. Patient under guardianship or trusteeship
  8. Patient subject to a legal protection measure or out of state to express their consent
  9. Patient in a situation of social fragility

A patient may be excluded at the end of the examination if at least one of the three sequences of bili-MRI could not be obtained (apnea impossible, image reconstruction problem).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: 1.5T magnetic field
For each patient who undergo a 1.5T MRI, 3 sequences will be done: (i) a conventional SPACE sequence, (ii) an ultra-rapid sequence (sequence CS-SPACE) acquired in apnoea and (iii) an accelerated sequence (sequence CS-SPACE) but remaining synchronized with the breath.
On top of the conventional SPACE sequence, 2 supplementary sequences will be performed with the ultra-rapid sequence (sequence CS-SPACE) either acquired in apnoea or synchronized with the breath.
Other: 3T magnetic field
For each patient who undergo a 3T MRI, 3 sequences will be done: (i) a conventional SPACE sequence, (ii) an ultra-rapid sequence (sequence CS-SPACE) acquired in apnoea and (iii) an accelerated sequence (sequence CS-SPACE) but remaining synchronized with the breath.
On top of the conventional SPACE sequence, 2 supplementary sequences will be performed with the ultra-rapid sequence (sequence CS-SPACE) either acquired in apnoea or synchronized with the breath.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global quality of the images evaluated with a Likert score
Time Frame: 1 day: from the consent signature to the end of the exam

The global Likert score corresponds to the average of scores varying between 1 and 5 and based on the following criteria :

i. diagnostic quality (feasibility of establishing a diagnosis when reading the image), including canal visibility (from score 1 = no diagnostic to score 5 = Excellent) ii. the sharpness of the image, especially the canal sharpness (from score 1 = too blurry / illegible to score 5 = sharp) iii. removal of the background signal (contrast quality) (from score 1 = too much background / illegible to score 5 = no background).

The global Likert score will vary between 1 (worst) and 5 (best) as well.

1 day: from the consent signature to the end of the exam

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the global quality of the images evaluated with a Likert score between the three sequences performed with the 1.5T MRI scanner
Time Frame: 1 day: from the consent signature to the end of the exam

The sequences will be compared in pairs based on the overall image quality to determine, where appropriate, the sequence providing the best performance. The global quality of the images will be evaluated with a Likert score as described in the primary outcome measure.

The global Likert score corresponds to the average of scores varying between 1 and 5 and based on the following criteria :

i. diagnostic quality (feasibility of establishing a diagnosis when reading the image), including canal visibility (from score 1 = no diagnostic to score 5 = Excellent) ii. the sharpness of the image, especially the canal sharpness (from score 1 = too blurry / illegible to score 5 = sharp) iii. removal of the background signal (contrast quality) (from score 1 = too much background / illegible to score 5 = no background).

The global Likert score will vary between 1 (worst) and 5 (best) as well.

1 day: from the consent signature to the end of the exam
Comparison of the global quality of the images evaluated with a Likert score between the three sequences performed with the 3T MRI scanner
Time Frame: 1 day: from the consent signature to the end of the exam

The sequences will be compared in pairs based on the overall image quality to determine, where appropriate, the sequence providing the best performance. The global quality of the images will be evaluated with a Likert score as described in the primary outcome measure.

The global Likert score corresponds to the average of scores varying between 1 and 5 and based on the following criteria :

i. diagnostic quality (feasibility of establishing a diagnosis when reading the image), including canal visibility (from score 1 = no diagnostic to score 5 = Excellent) ii. the sharpness of the image, especially the canal sharpness (from score 1 = too blurry / illegible to score 5 = sharp) iii. removal of the background signal (contrast quality) (from score 1 = too much background / illegible to score 5 = no background).

The global Likert score will vary between 1 (worst) and 5 (best) as well.

1 day: from the consent signature to the end of the exam
Comparison of the sequences between 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners evaluated with the Likert score
Time Frame: 1 day: from the consent signature to the end of the exam

Comparison of the sequences between 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners using the Likert score in order to determine the influence of the magnetic field on the global quality of the images.

The global Likert score corresponds to the average of scores varying between 1 and 5 and based on the following criteria :

i. diagnostic quality (feasibility of establishing a diagnosis when reading the image), including canal visibility (from score 1 = no diagnostic to score 5 = Excellent) ii. the sharpness of the image, especially the canal sharpness (from score 1 = too blurry / illegible to score 5 = sharp) iii. removal of the background signal (contrast quality) (from score 1 = too much background / illegible to score 5 = no background).

The global Likert score will vary between 1 (worst) and 5 (best) as well.

1 day: from the consent signature to the end of the exam
Performance of each sequence in the visualization of the pathology and / or an anatomical variant in the 1.5T magnetic field group, evaluated in percentage
Time Frame: 1 day: from the consent signature to the end of the exam
The performance is evaluated as the number of well-diagnosed patients out of the total number of cases seen at surgery in the 1.5T magnetic field group
1 day: from the consent signature to the end of the exam

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vanina Faucher, MD, Service de Radiologie et d'Echographie, NHC Strasbourg

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 26, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cholangiocarcinoma

Clinical Trials on ultra-rapid acquisition of bile ducts images

3
Subscribe