Use of an Ultra-rapid BRCA1/2 Status Screening Test in Diagnostic and Theranostic Indication: Performance and Interest for Patients and Practitioners (TURBO)

April 17, 2025 updated by: Centre Georges Francois Leclerc

The time taken to obtain the results of germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 has become a major issue in adapting the therapeutic management of patients, particularly those with breast cancer.

The time taken to obtain the results of BRCA1/2 tests in routine laboratories with a view to personalised treatment can range from a few weeks to a few months. The waiting time required to obtain results is likely to cause stress and anxiety in cancer patients. The investigators hypothesise that ultra-rapid testing can reduce anxiety about patients' genetic status and improve their mental well-being.

The main objective of this project is to compare the results obtained with an ultra-fast kit developed by O.N.T with those obtained with the current gold standard, NGS sequencing.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Manon REDA, Dr
  • Phone Number: +33 03.80.73.75.00
  • Email: mreda@cgfl.fr

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Emilie REDERSTORFF, Project Manager
  • Phone Number: +33 03 45 34 81 16
  • Email: erederstorff@cgfl.fr

Study Locations

      • Dijon, France, 21000
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Georges-Francois Leclerc
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Manon REDA, Dr
          • Phone Number: 03 80 73 75 00
          • Email: mreda@cgfl.fr
      • Levallois-perret, France, 92300

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Breast cancer with an indication for theranostic BRCA1/2 analysis or diagnostic BRCA1/2 analysis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Indication for oncogenetic consultation with a wide panel test including BRCA1/2 (gold standard) as part of the standard theranostic and diagnostic management of breast cancer.
  • The patient agrees to take part in the study, to follow all the study procedures and to complete the questionnaires sent during the consultation or by email.
  • Diagnosis of the disease ≤ 6 months
  • The patient must be affiliated to the social security system.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant disorder or condition likely to compromise understanding of study information or completion of questionnaires
  • Patients who do not have an email address and/or do not have internet access or tools to connect to the internet
  • Women who are pregnant, may become pregnant or are breast-feeding
  • Persons deprived of their liberty or under guardianship (including curatorship)
  • Inability to undergo trial monitoring for geographical, social or psychological reasons.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Standard arm
Analysis carried out using the gold standard with BRCA1/2 results provided on average in 2 months for the theranostic analysis and 3 months for the "standard" analysis + ultrafast BRCA1/2 test (nanopore test) with no communication of results to the patient at 1-2 weeks.

3 questionnaires to allowed to assess satisfaction and acceptance of the nanopore ultrafast test by practitioners and anxiety of results by patients :

  • STAI-Y (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory)
  • Patient's Questionnaire
  • Practitioner's questionnaire
Experimental arm
Analysis carried out using the gold standard with BRCA1/2 results provided in an average of 2 months for the theranostic analysis and 3 months for the "standard" analysis + ultra-rapid BRCA1/2 test (nanopore test) with results communicated to the patient in 1-2 weeks. This communication will be accompanied by the necessary explanations to enable the patient to understand that this is a preliminary result and that only the gold standard will constitute a definitive result.

3 questionnaires to allowed to assess satisfaction and acceptance of the nanopore ultrafast test by practitioners and anxiety of results by patients :

  • STAI-Y (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory)
  • Patient's Questionnaire
  • Practitioner's questionnaire
Communication of the results of the BRCA1/2 ultra rapid test during a consultation 1 to 2 weeks after the test

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the results obtained with an ultra-rapid kit BRCA1/2 with those obtained with the current gold standard, by checking the sensitivity, specificity and the rate of patients correctly classified for BRCA1 and 2 status
Time Frame: During 2 months

The main objective will be to determine the rate of misclassified patients by pooling the 2 arms, false positives and false negatives.

  • True positives (VP) : patients presenting a BRCA 1 or 2 mutation with the ultrafast BRCA1/2 test and the gold standard.
  • False positives (FP) : patients with a BRCA 1 or 2 mutation using the BRCA1/2 ultrafast test and no BRCA 1 or 2 mutation using the gold standard.
  • True negatives (VN) : patients with no BRCA 1 or 2 mutation using the BRCA1/2 ultrafast test and the gold standard.
  • False negatives (FN) : patients without a BRCA 1 or 2 mutation using the BRCA1/2 ultrafast test and with a BRCA 1 or 2 mutation using the standard test.

WELL classified = VP + VN, poorly classified= FP+ FN FPs will generate anxiety, and FNs will lead to a loss of chance for patients if the ultrafast BRCA1/2 test (nanopore test) is used exclusively instead of the gold standard. The overall number of misclassified patients must therefore be limited.

During 2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the ultra-rapid BRCA1/2 test
Time Frame: During 2 months
Evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the ultra-rapid BRCA1/2 test (nanopore test) compared with the standard BRCA1/2 test (gold standard).
During 2 months
Evaluate clinician satisfaction with satisfaction scale used in genetic counselling
Time Frame: During 2 months

Clinician satisfaction (oncogeneticist and oncologist) and acceptance of the BRCA1/2 ultrafast test (nanopore test) will be evaluated in both arms using a questionnaire to assess clinician satisfaction at 2 different times for each practitioner involved in patient follow-up:

  • When the first patient is unopposed;
  • At the last patient's discharge.
During 2 months
To assess the impact on patients' mental well-being (anxiety or reassurance) using the State-Trait Anxiety Questionnaire (STAI-Y)
Time Frame: During 2 months

Anxiety will be assessed in each arm using the State-Trait Anxiety Questionnaire (STAI-Y) at 4 different time points:

  • After the patient has not objected to taking part in the TURBO study at the first consultation (before randomization);
  • 1-2 weeks after inclusion. The questionnaire will be e-mailed to patients. The questionnaire must be completed before the results of the BRCA1/2 ultrafast test (nanopore test) are communicated to patients in the experimental group.
  • 4 weeks after inclusion. The questionnaire will be sent by email.
  • 8 - 12 weeks after inclusion, during the consultation for the communication of test results with the gold standard, before the communication of results.
During 2 months
Evaluate patient satisfaction used in genetic counselling
Time Frame: During 2 months

Patient satisfaction will be assessed in both arms using a satisfaction scale used in genetic counselling at two different times:

  • After the patient has made no objection to participating in the TURBO study during the first consultation (before randomization);
  • 8 - 12 weeks after inclusion, before the consultation for the gold standard test results.
During 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 12, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 12, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 12, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-A02176-39

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Questionnaires

Subscribe