- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03902457
Histomorphometric and Tomographic Assessment on the Influence of the Placement of a Collagen Membrane Subjacent the Sinus Mucosa After Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation
September 30, 2020 updated by: ARDEC Academy
Histomorphometric and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Assessments on the Influence a Collagen Membrane Placed Subjacent the Sinus Mucosa After Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation. A Randomized Clinical Trial.
the purpose of the study is to look for differences in dimensional variations of augmented maxillary sinuses with or without the placement of a collagen membrane subjacent the sinus mucosa.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Material and Methods: After the elevation of the maxillary sinus mucosa, a collagen membrane with standard dimensions will be placed at the test sites subjacent the sinus mucosa and the elevated space will be filled with a xenograft, both test and control groups.
A collagen membrane will be placed to cover the antrostomy at both groups and sutures will be provided to close the wound.
After six months of healing, mini-implants will be installed.
After 9 months, biopsies containing the mini-implants will be harvested for histomorphometric analyses.
CBCTs will be taken for all patients before surgery (T0), after 1 week from sinus floor augmentation (T1) and after 9 months of healing (T2).
Osseointegration of the mini-implants and dimensional changes over time of soft and hard tissues will be evaluated on the CBCTs.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
20
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Cartagena
-
Cartagena de Indias, Cartagena, Colombia, 5710
- Colombia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
21 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- presence of an edentulous atrophic zone in the posterior segment of the maxilla
- height of the sinus floor ≤4 mm
- desiring a prosthetic restoration of the zone using a fix prosthesis supported by implants;
- ≥ 21 years of age
- good general health
- no contraindication for oral surgical procedures
- not being pregnant
Exclusion Criteria:
- present a systemic disordered
- had a chemotherapic or radiotherapeutic treatment
- are smokers >10 cigarettes per day
- have an acute or a chronic sinusitis
- had a previous bone augmentation procedures in the zone of interest.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: test site
The sinus mucosa will be elevated and, at the test sites, a collagen membrane will be placed subjacent the sinus mucosa
|
Maxillary sinus augmentation procedures have become increasingly popular procedures before placement of dental implants in posterior maxillae that have suffered severe bone loss due to sinus pneumatization, alveolar bone atrophy, or trauma.
Other Names:
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: control site
The sinus mucosa will be elevated and, at the control sites, a collagen membrane will not be placed subjacent the sinus mucosa
|
Maxillary sinus augmentation procedures have become increasingly popular procedures before placement of dental implants in posterior maxillae that have suffered severe bone loss due to sinus pneumatization, alveolar bone atrophy, or trauma.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changing in height of the elevated zone
Time Frame: The CBCTs will be taken before surgery (T0) and 1-week (T1) and 9 months (T2) after surgery.
|
Measurements will be assessed in the medial, middle and lateral regions of the elevated zone using the cone beam computerized tomographies (CBCTs) taken in various periods.
|
The CBCTs will be taken before surgery (T0) and 1-week (T1) and 9 months (T2) after surgery.
|
|
New bone-to-implant contact
Time Frame: Mini-implants will be installed six months after sinus lifting and retrieved after three months of healing.
|
Measurements will be assessed between the most coronal (B) and the most apical (A) contacts of new bone to the implant surface.
|
Mini-implants will be installed six months after sinus lifting and retrieved after three months of healing.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changing in mucosa thickness
Time Frame: The CBCTs will be taken before surgery (T0) and 1-week (T1) and 9 months (T2) after surgery.
|
Measurements will be assessed in the cone beam computerized tomographies (CBCTs) taken in various periods.
Comparisons among the CBCTs of each participants will be performed.
|
The CBCTs will be taken before surgery (T0) and 1-week (T1) and 9 months (T2) after surgery.
|
|
New bone density around the mini-implant, from B to A and up to a distance of 400 µm from the implant surface.
Time Frame: Mini-implants will be installed six months after sinus lifting and retrieved after three months of healing
|
Measurements will be assessed using a point counting procedure, superposing a lattice with squares of 50 µm over the histological image.
|
Mini-implants will be installed six months after sinus lifting and retrieved after three months of healing
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Lundgren S, Andersson S, Gualini F, Sennerby L. Bone reformation with sinus membrane elevation: a new surgical technique for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6(3):165-73.
- Omori Y, Ricardo Silva E, Botticelli D, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Lang NP, Xavier SP. Reposition of the bone plate over the antrostomy in maxillary sinus augmentation: A histomorphometric study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Aug;29(8):821-834. doi: 10.1111/clr.13292. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
- Schwartz-Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolev E. The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol. 2004 Apr;75(4):511-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.4.511.
- Nolan PJ, Freeman K, Kraut RA. Correlation between Schneiderian membrane perforation and sinus lift graft outcome: a retrospective evaluation of 359 augmented sinus. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jan;72(1):47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.07.020. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
- Kawakami S, Lang NP, Iida T, Ferri M, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Botticelli D. Influence of the position of the antrostomy in sinus floor elevation assessed with cone-beam computed tomography: A randomized clinical trial. J Investig Clin Dent. 2018 Nov;9(4):e12362. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12362. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
- Kawakami S, Lang NP, Ferri M, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Botticelli D. Influence of the height of the antrostomy in sinus floor elevation assessed by cone beam computed tomography- a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 January/February;34(1):223-232. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7112. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
- Iida T, Carneiro Martins Neto E, Botticelli D, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Lang NP, Xavier SP. Influence of a collagen membrane positioned subjacent the sinus mucosa following the elevation of the maxillary sinus. A histomorphometric study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Dec;28(12):1567-1576. doi: 10.1111/clr.13027. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
- Aimetti M, Romagnoli R, Ricci G, Massei G. Maxillary sinus elevation: the effect of macrolacerations and microlacerations of the sinus membrane as determined by endoscopy. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001 Dec;21(6):581-9.
- Khoury F. Augmentation of the sinus floor with mandibular bone block and simultaneous implantation: a 6-year clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Jul-Aug;14(4):557-64.
- Choi BH, Zhu SJ, Jung JH, Lee SH, Huh JY. The use of autologous fibrin glue for closing sinus membrane perforations during sinus lifts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Feb;101(2):150-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.04.008. Epub 2005 Sep 19.
- Pikos MA. Maxillary sinus membrane repair: report of a technique for large perforations. Implant Dent. 1999;8(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/00008505-199901000-00003.
- Proussaefs P, Lozada J. The "Loma Linda pouch": a technique for repairing the perforated sinus membrane. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Dec;23(6):593-7.
- Proussaefs P, Lozada J, Kim J. Effects of sealing the perforated sinus membrane with a resorbable collagen membrane: a pilot study in humans. J Oral Implantol. 2003;29(5):235-41. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2003)0292.3.CO;2.
- Testori T, Wallace SS, Del Fabbro M, Taschieri S, Trisi P, Capelli M, Weinstein RL. Repair of large sinus membrane perforations using stabilized collagen barrier membranes: surgical techniques with histologic and radiographic evidence of success. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008 Feb;28(1):9-17.
- Kim YK, Yun PY, Oh JS, Kim SG. Prognosis of closure of large sinus membrane perforations using pedicled buccal fat pads and a resorbable collagen membrane: case series study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Aug;40(4):188-94. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.4.188. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
- Scala A, Lang NP, Velez JU, Favero R, Bengazi F, Botticelli D. Effects of a collagen membrane positioned between augmentation material and the sinus mucosa in the elevation of the maxillary sinus floor. An experimental study in sheep. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Nov;27(11):1454-1461. doi: 10.1111/clr.12762. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
- Favero V, Lang NP, Canullo L, Urbizo Velez J, Bengazi F, Botticelli D. Sinus floor elevation outcomes following perforation of the Schneiderian membrane. An experimental study in sheep. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Feb;27(2):233-40. doi: 10.1111/clr.12576. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
- Zijderveld SA, Schulten EA, Aartman IH, ten Bruggenkate CM. Long-term changes in graft height after maxillary sinus floor elevation with different grafting materials: radiographic evaluation with a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jul;20(7):691-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01697.x.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
February 3, 2016
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
October 30, 2018
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
December 30, 2018
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 2, 2019
First Posted (ACTUAL)
April 4, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
October 5, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 30, 2020
Last Verified
September 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CBCT sinus membrane
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
the results will be published in a Journal
IPD Sharing Time Frame
will be become available after the time required by the journal for publication and will be available all the time the journal is active.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.