Reversal of an Unfavorable Effect of Hydrochlorothiazide Compared to Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor on Serum Uric Acid and Oxypurines Levels by Estrogen-progestin Therapy in Hypertensive Postmenopausal Women.

April 18, 2019 updated by: Anna Posadzy-Małaczyńska
The aim was to assess the effect of estrogen-progestin therapy (EPT) on serum levels of uric acid (SUA) and its precursors: xanthine (X) and hypoxanthine (HX) and on uric acid (UA) renal excretion in hypertensive postmenopausal women treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or thiazide diuretic (HCTZ).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hyperuricemia is considered one of the risk factors for arterial hypertension in postmenopausal women. The recent analysis by Loeffler confirmed that, as indicated in the NHANES survey, uric acid is a powerful cardiovascular risk factor.Analysis of age and sex strata in a meta-analysis showed hyperuricemia to be independently predictive of new-onset hypertension with a stronger association in women. In women, a positive relationship was found between age and serum uric acid levels. This phenomenon can also be explained by impaired renal uric acid excretion progressing with age. Moreover, menopause is independently associated with higher serum uric acid levels, whereas postmenopausal hormone use is associated with lower uric acid levels among postmenopausal women.

According to the guidelines on the management of arterial hypertension, first-line drugs in hypertensive elderly patients also include thiazide diuretics. This is particularly justified in postmenopausal women at risk of osteoporosis because thiazides have a positive effect on calcium balance, which is disordered in postmenopausal women. The natriuretic effect of thiazide diuretics itself is also desired due to increased sodium sensitivity after menopause. Meta-analysis performed by Mussini et al. covering 60 studies with thiazide diuretics in antihypertensive therapy (from years 1946-2014) showed their superiority in reducing pulse pressure over other classes of antihypertensive drugs. However; at the same time, it is known that thiazides increase serum uric acid levels.It has been suggested that increase in serum uric acid caused by diuretic treatment may partially offset the benefits of blood pressure reduction. This has been confirmed in an analysis of data from the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) that showed that increase in uric acid levels in hypertensive patients treated with diuretics was associated with smaller clinical benefits from antihypertensive therapy assessed as a risk for episodes of ischemic heart disease.

Since menopause depends to a great extent on age, it is difficult to separate the influence of uric acid levels and its renal clearance on the development of hyperuricemia. This is possible to achieve only if uric acid metabolism is compared in postmenopausal women receiving and not receiving estrogen-progestin therapy (EPT). A potential factor limiting the unfavorable effect of thiazides on uric acid levels in hypertensive women may be EPT. Mihmanli et al. demonstrated benefits from estrogen supplementation on the renal vessels. Experimental studies on rats showed that estrogens (through a non-genomic mechanism of action) have a vasodilating effect on the renal arteries due to the mechanism of endothelium generating nitric oxide by 17-B-estradiol; and through the "NO-dependent" and "NO-independent" mechanisms, estrogens have a suppressive effect on its vasoconstrictive activity. Moreover, Xiao et al. demonstrated the effect of estradiol on regression of hardening of the renal glomeruli.

Therefore, the aim of the study was to assess the effect of EPT on serum levels of uric acid and its precursors and on its renal excretion in postmenopausal women receiving antihypertensive treatment with ACEI or thiazide diuretics as well as to explain if EPT prevents hyperuricemia caused by thiazide diuretics in postmenopausal hypertensive patients.

Methods Subjects: Treatment-naive postmenopausal women with recently diagnosed essential hypertension (grade 1 or 2 according to ESH(European Society of Hypertension)/ESC(European Society of Cardiology) 2013 guidelines) were included in the study. They were assessed by a primary care physician or gynecologist as postmenopausal, with age ranging from 49 to 53 years old, of Caucasian race. The final menstrual period (FMP) was identified retrospectively. In order to determine this criterion, I used STRAW (Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop) guidelines. According to the authors, a lack of menstruation for 12 months indicates clinical menopause and is referred to as "postmenopause". All the women had the expected postmenopausal increase in follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations (FSH 78.32 ± 8.73 IU/ml) and experienced flushes or other vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause. For this reason and due to hypertension, they were randomized to EPT and hypotensive treatment. Normotensive women with vasomotor symptoms received randomly either EPT or nothing. The exclusion criteria included: breast cancer in a first-degree relative, hyperplasia diagnosed by endometrial biopsy, history of thromboembolic diseases, current or history of use of estrogen-progestin therapy or contraceptives, diabetes, kidney failure, thyroid disease, and heart and other chronic diseases (secondary hypertension, atrial fibrillation). Results of mammography performed 12 months prior to the study were negative in all the screened women.

In the invitation letter, women with arterial hypertension were invited to take part in a study on hypertension management and menopause-related symptoms, or menopause-related symptoms only in normotensive women. Informed consent was obtained from the subjects prior to the study. The study was carried out in accordance with The Declaration of Helsinki and was also registered and approved by the local Ethics Committee at the University of Medical Sciences in Poznan with the registration number 1319/99. A physical examination and biochemical screening was performed in all women at baseline.

Study design: The screening phase included 140 women with vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause. They met inclusion, but not exclusion criteria, and were treatment-naive for hypertension. At two separate visits at a weekly interval (wash-out period), hypertension was defined as the mean of three office-based measurements between ≥140/90 mmHg and <180/110 mmHg. Subjects included in the study had no contraindications to transdermal estrogen-progestin therapy or hypotensive treatment. The study's control group consisted of 40 normotensive women (<140/90 mmHg, measured at two separate visits under similar conditions) who had also the possibility to receive transdermal estrogen-progestin therapy due to vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause.

At the beginning of the study, hypertensive women were assigned randomly (sealed envelopes) to two treatment groups: with a diuretic - hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg/day p.o. (n=50) or with an ACEI - perindopril 4 mg/day p.o. (n=50), and to a group receiving estrogen-progestin therapy (EPT+) and a group not receiving hormones (EPT-). Normotensive women were assigned randomly only to either EPT+ or EPT- groups. Estrogen-progestin therapy was given in the form of transdermal patches releasing 17β-estradiol (0.05 mg/24 hours) and norethisterone (0.25 mg/24 hours) Estracomb TTS®.

Control measurements were performed in all subjects after one year. At the end, 20 females did not complete the study (4 due to an adverse reaction of perindopril in the form of cough, 6 needed additional antihypertensive therapy - 2 with ACEI and 4 with HCTZ and 10 for no reason). All females from the normotensive group completed the trial.

Finally, groups of 20 women with hypertension in each treatment group and 20 women with normal blood pressure, treated with or without EPT, were chosen for statistical analyses in the order in which they had finished the 12-month follow-up of the study.

Measurements: Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) office-based blood pressure was measured after five minutes in sitting position by means of a validated automatic device (Omron 705 CP) placed on the arm with higher blood pressure. In each time, the average of three measurements was used. Ambulatory blood pressure measurements were performed in all study participants at entrance and after 6 and 12 months using an automatic device (MOBIL-O-GRAPH). The device was set up to perform a blood pressure recording every 15 minutes during the day and every 30 minutes at night, over a 24-hour period. 80% of the correct measurements were needed to validate the result.

Measurement of renal function: Renal plasma flow (RPF) was measured as the clearance of 125I-iodohippuran using a constant infusion technique with timed urine sampling [20]. Based on RPF, additional renal hemodynamic parameters: filtration fraction (FF) and renal vascular resistance (RVR) were estimated [21].

Laboratory tests: Serum and urine creatinine levels were determined with a spectrophotometric method [22] using an autoanalyzer (MEGA, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and the Mascot software package (Matrix Science, UK). Serum and urine uric acid levels were determined with an enzymatic uricase method using PAP 150 kits by bioMérieux SA (Marcy l'Etoile, France). Serum hypoxanthine and xanthine levels were determined with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [23] using a Hewlett-Packard 1050 system with UV detector by HP Inc. (Palo Alto, CA, USA).

Serum creatinine levels were determined using Jaffé reaction. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault equation for women.

Statistical analysis: Student's t-test was used to compare continuous variables and the normality of distribution of an investigated feature in both study populations. T-test with the Cochran-Cox adjustment was used in cases where variances of analyzed variables in both study populations differed, or Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test in cases where there were no normal distribution.

Baseline characteristics were compared using ANOVA (in the case of parametric variables) or by means of the Kruskal-Wallis test (in the case of nonparametric variables); subsequently, the different groups were compared in pairs. Means were compared by means of the Kruskal-Wallis test one-way analysis of ranks; then, the relevant groups were compared in pairs. If the groups differed significantly, multiple comparison Dunn test was applied.

Multiple linear regression models were constructed for selected parameters of the effects of HCTZ and EPT (women with arterial hypertension). Models with interactions were also developed. If β regression coefficients for interactions of independent variables were significant, these models were used to interpret the variability of the dependent variable. F-test verifies the statistical significance of all variables in the model. Similar multiple linear regression models were also constructed to show the effect of hypertension and EPT.

Values represent mean ± standard deviation (SD) if not stated otherwise. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

180

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

47 years to 51 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment-naive postmenopausal women
  • Diagnosed hypertension (grade 1 or 2 according to ESH/ESC 2013 guidelines)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • breast cancer in a first-degree relative
  • hyperplasia diagnosed by endometrial biopsy,
  • history of thromboembolic diseases,
  • current or history of use of estrogen-progestin therapy or contraceptives
  • diabetes,
  • kidney failure,
  • thyroid disease,
  • heart and other chronic diseases (secondary hypertension, atrial fibrillation)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group
Control group consisted of 40 postmenopausal women with normal blood pressure.
Experimental: Hypertensive women group receiving hydrochlorothiazide
Patients received hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg/day p.o. for 1 year.
hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg/day p.o. for 12 months
Experimental: Hypertensive women group receiving perindopril.
Patients received perindopril 4 mg/day p.o for 1 year.
4 mg/day p.o. for 12 months
Experimental: Hypertensive women group receiving hydrochlorothiazide and EPT
Patients received hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg/day p.o. and estrogen-progestin therapy- transdermal patches releasing 17β-estradiol (0.05 mg/24 hours) and norethisterone (0.25 mg/24 hours) for 1 year
hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg/day p.o. for 12 months
Transdermal patches releasing 17β-estradiol (0.05 mg/24 hours) and norethisterone (0.25 mg/24 hours) for 12 months
Experimental: Hypertensive women group receiving perindopril and EPT.
Patients received perindopril 4 mg/day p.o and estrogen-progestin therapy- transdermal patches releasing 17β-estradiol (0.05 mg/24 hours) and norethisterone (0.25 mg/24 hours) for 1 year
4 mg/day p.o. for 12 months
Transdermal patches releasing 17β-estradiol (0.05 mg/24 hours) and norethisterone (0.25 mg/24 hours) for 12 months
Experimental: Hipotensive women group receiving EPT.
Patients received estrogen-progestin therapy- transdermal patches releasing 17β-estradiol (0.05 mg/24 hours) and norethisterone (0.25 mg/24 hours) for 1 year.
Transdermal patches releasing 17β-estradiol (0.05 mg/24 hours) and norethisterone (0.25 mg/24 hours) for 12 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood pressure in mmHg
Time Frame: 12 months

As compared with normotensive women, hypertensive women showed higher office and ambulatory blood pressure, as well as a lower night-time decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

Both perindopril and hydrochlorothiazide led to a similar reduction in arterial blood pressure in hypertensive women.

After 12 months of treatment, statistically significant differences were observed between the EPT+ and EPT- subgroups in systolic and diastolic office-based blood pressure in the study group treated with ACEI. Such effect of EPT on ABPM(ambulatory blood pressure monitoring) was not observed in all study participants. Multiple linear regression models have shown that after 12 months of antihypertensive treatment there were no significant differences in night-time decrease in blood pressure caused by EPT treatment, despite its significant change when compared to baseline values for ACEI and HCTZ subgroups.

12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Renal plasma flow in ml/min
Time Frame: 12 months

As compared with normotensive women, hypertensive women showed lower GFR and RPF.

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) remained unaltered in all subgroups throughout the duration of the study. When compared to the baseline values, renal plasma flow (RPF) increased significantly in women treated with perindopril, both with and without EPT. At the end of the study, there were no differences in RPF in the two subgroups of ACEI (EPT+ vs EPT-) groups. RPF also increased in women treated with hydrochlorothiazide and receiving EPT. However, RPF was substantially reduced in the subgroup of women treated with hydrochlorothiazide without EPT.

12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum uric acid levels in mg/dl
Time Frame: 12 months

Hypertensive women had significantly higher serum uric acid levels than normotensive women, whereas clearance and fractional excretion of uric acid were significantly lower in hypertensive than in normotensive women.

Uric acid levels in plasma decreased significantly in women treated with perindopril, both in the subgroup receiving and not receiving hormone replacement therapy (HRT).

At the end of the study, there were no significant differences in plasma uric acid levels in two subgroups treated with ACEI (EPT+ vs EPT-) In hypertensive women treated with hydrochlorothiazide, uric acid concentrations in plasma decreased significantly when compared to the baseline values, but only in the subgroup receiving estrogen-progestin therapy.

12 months
Serum xanthine and hypoxanthine levels in mg/dl
Time Frame: 12 months

In the groups of hypertensive women, serum xanthine and hypoxanthine levels were significantly higher than in the group of normotensive women.

In multivariate analysis, behavior of xanthine and hypoxanthine in the subgroups treated with or without EPT showed significant differences in patients treated with diuretic. In women treated with ACEI with or without EPT, only hypoxanthine levels decreased significantly

12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 10, 2000

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 6, 2001

Study Completion (Actual)

November 17, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Hydrochlorothiazide

3
Subscribe