Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Gastrectomy in Gastric Cancer (LCFRAGIGC)

Cumulative Summation Analysis of Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Gastrectomy in Gastric Cancer

The investigators prospectively collected the clinical data of Da Vinci robot-assisted radical gastrectomy patients conducted by the same group of physicians from October 2017 to October 2018. The learning curve of the surgery was analyzed with the moving average method and the cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM). The short-term efficacy was then validated by comparing the perioperative and pathologic outcomes of patients in the two stages of the learning curve.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710061
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University
        • Contact:
          • Bingyin Shi, MD,PHD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients were scheduled to undergo minimally invasive gastric cancer surgery and meet the above conditions

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1.Patients were 18-90 years old
  • 2. Patients with a documented diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma
  • 3. patients were scheduled to undergo minimally invasive gastric cancer surgery
  • 4.patients with no preoperative evidence of serosal invasion or extraperigastric lymph node metastasis on preoperative computed tomography scans, upper endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasound

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Patients with neoadjuvant treatment
  • 2. Patients procedure concurrent with the gastrectomy
  • 3.Patients with palliative surgery
  • 4. Patients with the contraindications for general anesthesia
  • 5. Patients were pregnant or mentally incompetent
  • 6. Patients with serious systemic comorbidities, such as severe heart failure, respiratory failure, uncontrolled hypertension

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operation time,min
Time Frame: 1 week
The surgeon begins the operation until the incision is closed
1 week
Docking time,min
Time Frame: 1 week
From the skin cutting through the observation hole to the robot moving to the designated position, the lens and the instrument arm enter the abdominal cavity and prepare for this period
1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluated blood loss ,ml
Time Frame: 1 week
The amount of bleeding in the suction device plus the amount of bleeding dipped in the gauze
1 week
Number of retrieved lymph nodes
Time Frame: 1 week
Refer to the postoperative pathology report
1 week
Day of first flatus,day
Time Frame: 2 week
2 week
Day of first fluid diet,day
Time Frame: 2 week
2 week
the rate of postoperative complications
Time Frame: 30 days after the operation
Postoperative complications included infectious complications, intra-abdominal/intraluminal bleeding, gastric stasis and leakage
30 days after the operation
postoperative hospital stay, days
Time Frame: 30 days after the operation
Length of postoperative hospital stay
30 days after the operation
cost
Time Frame: 30 days after the operation
total cost in the hospital
30 days after the operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 28, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stomach Neoplasms

3
Subscribe