An Online Pain Education Program for Working Adults

August 24, 2019 updated by: TSE Mun Yee Mimi, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

An Online Pain Education Program for Working Adults: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial With One-month Follow-up

Pain is popular among working population and it is a strong predictor of poor quality of life. In this study, an internet-delivered pain education program will be provided to working adults aims at helping patients equip with pain-related knowledge and useful skills and evaluate the effectiveness of the internet-delivered program. Participants will be recruited follow snowball sampling and will be randomly allocated to experimental group and control group by 1:1 ratio. The internet-delivered pain education will last for 4 weeks with one-month follow-up. Basic knowledge of pain, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment and related resources will be introduced in the program. Pain intensity, pain-related disability, anxiety, depression and self-efficacy will be measured in baseline post-treatment and at one-month follow-up. Acceptability and satisfaction to the program will also collected.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Participants' eligibility will be accessed based on the following details:

1. Inclusion criteria:

  1. . Age between 16 to 60;
  2. . Have a full-time job;
  3. . Resident of China;
  4. . Can read and understand Chinese;
  5. . History with non-cancer pain in past 6 months(Nicholas et al., 2013);
  6. . Pain score should be at least 2 when using Numeric Rating Scale, a 11-point numeric scale (Pieh et al., 2012);
  7. . Own a mobile phone and can access to mobile phone, computer and the internet.

2. Exclusion criteria

  1. . Hospitalized patients;
  2. . Experiencing a drug addiction problem;
  3. . Further medical and surgical treatments or interventions is planned.

The outcome measures will be considered in four aspects, physical, psychological, psycho-social using a battery of questionnaires which were used in the previous similar studies and evaluation to the program will be measured by asking several questions. As the study will be conducted in China, all the questionnaires will use Chinese version.

  1. Physical Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): The BPI is a brief, self-administered questionnaire us. Pain severity is assessed by four items and pain interference by seven items. The items are rated on a scale ranging from 0 to 10. Previous study showed that BPI can used to measure not only cancer pain but also chronic pain and proved that BPI has good internal consistency and acceptable test-retest reliability.
  2. Psychological Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS): The DASS is a self-report instrument to measure three negative emotional states including depression, anxiety and stress. The previous study demonstrated that DASS has excellent internal consistency and validity was also proved.
  3. Psycho-social The Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ): A 10 item questionnaire assess the patient's beliefs about his or her ability to accomplish daily activities with pain. Higher score indicate greater pain-related self-efficacy.
  4. Satisfaction and acceptability Several questions will be asked at the end of the program to assess participants' satisfaction and acceptability of the program: (1) "Do you think this online pain management program useful?" "Does it worth your time following the program?" "Would you feel confident to recommend this program?" The questions were used in the previous studies to assess the acceptability of the internet-delivered program. Open-ended questions will also be used including "How do you think about this program?" "What are the strengths of the program?" "What are the disadvantages of the program?"

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Kowloon
      • Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • School of Nursing
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • YA JIE LI, MSc in Nurs

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 60 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 16 to 60;
  2. Have a full-time job;
  3. Resident of China;
  4. Can read and understand Chinese;
  5. History with non-cancer pain in past 6 months;
  6. Pain score should be at least 2 when using Numeric Rating Scale, a 11-point numeric scale;
  7. Own a mobile phone and can access to mobile phone, computer and the internet.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Hospitalized patients;
  2. Experiencing a drug addiction problem;
  3. Further medical and surgical treatments or interventions is planned.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
No intervention for the control group, only one-page simple material related to pain will be provided.
Experimental: Experimental group
Online pain education program will be accessible by the intervention group
Online pain education program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity and pain interference
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, one-month after intervention
Changes from baseline to Week 4 and one-month after the intervention in pain intensity and pain interference using Brief Pain Inventory
Baseline, Week 4, one-month after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain self-efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, one-month after intervention
Changes from baseline to Week 4 and one-month after the intervention in pain self-efficacy using Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ). PSEQ is a 10-item questionnaire assessing the confidence people with ongoing pain have in performing activities while in pain. Score of each item ranges from 0 to 6 (0 = not at all confident, 6 = completely confident). A total score is calculated by adding the scores for each item which ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores reflect stronger self-efficacy beliefs.
Baseline, Week 4, one-month after intervention
Depression, Anxiety and Stress
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, one-month after intervention
Changes from baseline to Week 4 and one-month after the intervention in depression, anxiety and stress using Depression Anxiety Stress Scale - 21 Scale (DASS-21). The DASS-21 is a set of three self-reported scales designed to measure the emotional states of depression, anxiety and stress. Each of the three DASS-21 scales contains 7 items and divided into subscales. The score of each item ranges feom 0 to 3 (o = do not apply to me at all, 3 = applied to me very much or most of the time). Total score is multiplied by 2 of the sum of each subscales. Higher score indicates the greater degree of the symptom.
Baseline, Week 4, one-month after intervention
Participant's Satisfaction and acceptability to the program
Time Frame: Week 4
Participants satisfaction and acceptability to the online pain education program will be assessed at post-treatment by several questions, including "do you think this online pain education program useful?" "does it worth your time following the program?" "would you feel confident to recommend this program to others?" Participants are required to answer the questions by "Yes" or "No". Open-ended question "what are the advantages and disadvantages of the program?" will also be asked. These questions have in the previous studies to assess the acceptability and satisfaction to the internet-delivered program.
Week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mimi Tse, PhD, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 5, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 5, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 5, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OPEP

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Online pain education program

3
Subscribe