Magnetic Resonance Post-contrast Vascular Hyperintensities at 3 T: a Sensitive Sign of Vascular Occlusion in Acute Ischaemic Stroke

Magnetic Resonance Post-contrast Vascular Hyperintensities at 3 T: a New Highly Sensitive Sign of Vascular Occlusion in Acute Ischaemic Stroke

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the diagnostic cornerstone for precisely identifying acute ischaemic strokes and locating vascular occlusions.

It was observed that a post-contrast three-dimensional turbo-spin-echo T1weighted sequence showed striking post-contrast vascular hyperintensities (PCVH) in ischaemic territories. The aim is to evaluate the prevalence and the meaning of this finding.

This study included 130 consecutive patients admitted for acute ischaemic stroke with a 3-T MRI performed in the first 12 h of symptom onset from September 2014 through September 2016. Two neuroradiologists blinded to clinical data analysed the first MRI assessments.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

130

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

130 consecutive patients admitted for acute ischaemic stroke with a 3-T MRI performed in the first 12 h of symptom onset.

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patients aged 18 and older at onset of an acute ischaemic stroke
  • Availability of at least one pre-therapeutic MRI performed in our centre within 12 h of stroke onset, including a post-contrast 3D TSE T1-weighted sequence.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients with posterior fossa strokes
  • Patients with known intracranial vasculitis or MoyaMoya disease
  • Presence of severe MR imaging artefacts preventing correct interpretation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overal survival
Time Frame: 7 years
from the AR-PML diagnosis date to that of death or censored on 31 December 2015
7 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Ischaemic Stroke

Clinical Trials on MRI images review

3
Subscribe