Integrating Quantitative MRI and Artificial Intelligence to Improve Prostate Cancer Classification

April 12, 2024 updated by: Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
This study evaluates how new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and artificial intelligence techniques improve the image quality and quantitative information for future prostate MRI exams in patients with suspicious of confirmed prostate cancer. The MRI and artificial intelligence techniques developed in this study may improve the accuracy in diagnosing prostate cancer in the future using less invasive techniques than what is currently used.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To develop and evaluate quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI analysis techniques that minimize patient- and scanner-specific variabilities in the calculation of quantitative parameters.

II. To develop and evaluate diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) methods that reduce prostate geometric distortion due to patient- and scanner-specific susceptibility and eddy current effects.

III. To develop and evaluate multi-class deep learning models that systematically integrate quantitative multi-parametric (mp)-MRI features for accurate detection and classification of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).

OUTLINE:

RETROSPECTIVE: Patients' medical records are reviewed.

PROSPECTIVE: Patients undergo additional 3 Tesla (T) MRI imaging over 30 minutes before, during, or after their standard of care 3T MRI for a total of 1.5 hours.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

275

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • Recruiting
        • UCLA / Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kyung H. Sung, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) who may have already undergone 3 T prostate multi-parametric MRI or were referred for 3 T multi-parametric prostate MRI prior to biopsy or radical prostatectomy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male patients 18 years of age and older
  • Clinical suspicion of prostate cancer or biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer
  • Undergone or undergoing multi-parametric 3 T prostate MRI at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA)
  • Ability to provide consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to MRI (e.g., cardiac devices, prosthetic valves, severe claustrophobia)
  • Contraindications to gadolinium contrast-based agents other than the possibility of an allergic reaction to the gadolinium contrast-based agent
  • Prior radiotherapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Observational (electronic health record review, 3 T MRI)

RETROSPECTIVE: Patients' medical records are reviewed.

PROSPECTIVE: Patients undergo additional 3T MRI imaging over 30 minutes before, during, or after their standard of care 3T MRI for a total of 1.5 hours.

Medical charts are reviewed
Undergo 3T MRI
Other Names:
  • 3T MRI
  • 3 Tesla MRI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Development of quantitative dynamic contrast (DCE)-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis techniques
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Both transfer constant (Ktrans) and rate constant (Kep) from normal prostate tissue will be evaluated for the inter-scanner variability. Pairwise dissimilarities between distributions will be estimated by computing the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic, defined as the maximum difference between the empirical distribution functions over the range of the parameter, using 200 cases for each of three MRI scanners. The mean of these pairwise dissimilarities between scanners will be computed to quantify the overall discrepancy of each DCE-MRI model. Construction of a 95% confidence interval for the difference in the mean discrepancies using the nonparametric bootstrap will be done to compare this mean discrepancy between DCE-MRI models. 10,000 bootstrap samples will be generated by sampling patients with replacement, stratifying by the scanner. Will conclude that the proposed DCE-MRI model has a reduced inter-scanner variability if the 95% confidence interval is entirely less than zero.
Up to 5 years
Development of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) methods that reduce prostate geometric distortion
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Differences between rectangular field of view-ENCODE and standard DWI in terms of the prostate Dice's similarity coefficient (primary outcome) and apparent diffusion coefficient consistency will be compared.
Up to 5 years
Development of multi-class deep learning models
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
The overall performance of FocalNet and Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System version 2 will be compared in terms of area under the curve. Comparison between area under the curves will be performed using DeLong's test. Will also include the comparison between FocalNet and baseline deep learning methods (U-Net and Deeplab without focal loss [FL] and mutual finding loss [MFL]) to characterize the advantages of using FL and MFL with the same study cohort. For each of these approaches, an optimal cut-point for classification of clinically significant prostate cancer will be identified by maximizing Youden's J (= sensitivity + specificity - 1) and will report sensitivity, specificity and 95% confidence intervals based on the selected cut-point.
Up to 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kyung H Sung, PhD, UCLA / Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 19-002202 (Other Identifier: UCLA / Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center)
  • NCI-2021-00373 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
  • R01CA248506 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 441480-KS-29447 (Other Grant/Funding Number: NCI)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Electronic Health Record Review

3
Subscribe