Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone Prior to Copper Intrauterine Device Insertion in Women Delivered Only by Cesarean Delivery

September 4, 2019 updated by: Ahmed Samy aly ashour, Cairo University

Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone Prior to Copper Intrauterine Device Insertion in Women Delivered Only by Cesarean Delivery:a Randomized Controlled Trial

To compare the effect of vaginal dinoprostone versus vaginal misoprostol administered before the copper intrauterine device(IUD) insertion in reducing IUD insertion pain and the difficulty in inserting the IUD in women delivered only by cesarean section.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Long-acting reversible contraception methods are highly effective methods for reduction of the unplanned pregnancy rate worldwide. The intrauterine device is a single procedure that provides reliable, effective and long term contraception for many women. However, the insertion procedure can be associated with a troublesome degree of pain that prevent some women from choosing its use. Different interventions have been described to decrease pain perception during intrauterine device insertion with no agreement on an effective one.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women delivered only by elective cesarean section and not received analgesics in the last 24 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindications to dinoprostone or misoprostol or IUD insertion and allergy to study drugs.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: dinoprostone
1 vaginal tablet of dinoprostone (3mg) (prostin® E2, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Puurs, Belgium) inserted by the study nurse 3 hours before IUD insertion.
1 vaginal tablet of dinoprostone (3mg) (prostin® E2, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Puurs, Belgium) inserted by the study nurse 3 hours before IUD insertion.
Active Comparator: misoprostol
1 vaginal tablet of misoprostol (200 mcg) (Misotac®; Sigma Pharma, SAE, Egypt) inserted by the study nurse 3 hours before IUD insertion.
1 vaginal tablet of misoprostol (200 mcg) (Misotac®; Sigma Pharma, SAE, Egypt) inserted by the study nurse 3 hours before IUD insertion.
Placebo Comparator: placebo
one tablet of placebo inserted by the study nurse 3 hours before IUD insertion.
one tablet of placebo inserted by the study nurse 3 hours before IUD insertion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The difference in pain scores during intrauterine device insertion
Time Frame: 10 minutes
The difference in pain scores during intrauterine device insertion using visual analog scale from 0 to 10
10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 30, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 5, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on IUD Pain

Clinical Trials on Dinoprostone 3 mg

3
Subscribe