The Role Of Local Anesthetics in the Management of Adverse Effects Associated With Intrauterine Device Application

May 6, 2020 updated by: Pınar Yalcin bahat, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital

The Role Of Local Anesthetics Effects During Intrauterine Device Application

Patients who visited our family planning clinic and opted for IUD application for contraception purposes were also offered NT/TLA treatments simultaneously. 40 patients who matched the inclusion criteria and received IUDs and NT/TLA treatments were included in the study group and 41 patients who only received IUDs were included in the control group. All patients received copper IUDs and none of them were on additional hormonal treatment. Before the insertion of IUD, women in the therapy group received NT treatment with 6ml of 1% procaine injected transvaginal into the cervix at 5 and 7 o'clock localizations. Following IUD insertion, another 6ml of 1% procaine was injected into the Frankenhauser ganglia bilaterally. A final dose of 8ml of 1% procaine was injected into the abdominal trigger points and intracutaneously into the L4-S4 dermatomes as quaddles.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • İ̇stanbul
      • Istanbul, İ̇stanbul, Turkey, 34000
        • Pinar Yalcin Bahat

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Women with underlying chronic diseases which could cause chronic pelvic pain such as endometriosis and which makes them prone to infections such as diabetes mellitus were excluded from the study. Furthermore, women by whom a complication had arised during the IUD insertion, such as uterine perforation, were also excluded from the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • not pregnant women
  • healty women age between 18- 45 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • chronic diseases which could cause chronic pelvic pain such as endometriosis
  • which makes them prone to infections such as diabetes mellitus
  • complication had arised during the IUD insertion, such as uterine perforation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
IUD patients
80 patients who matched the inclusion criteria and received IUDs
Patients who visited our family planning clinic and opted for IUD application for contraception purposes were also offered NT/TLA treatments simultaneously. 40 patients who matched the inclusion criteria and received IUDs and NT/TLA treatments were included in the study group and 41 patients who only received IUDs were included in the control group. All patients received copper IUDs and none of them were on additional hormonal treatment. Before the insertion of IUD, women in the therapy group received NT treatment with 6ml of 1% procaine injected transvaginal into the cervix at 5 and 7 o'clock localizations.
Other Names:
  • without NT/TLA (NT or also referred to as therapy with local anesthetics (TLA) )

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The VAS scores of patients after the application of IUDs
Time Frame: 1 month
The VAS scores of patients in both groups reported one month after the application of IUDs (Patients mark their pain intensity from 1 to 10 in vas scoring. In scoring, 1 point is the lowest score and shows that the patient has low pain, 10 is the highest score and shows severe pain.)
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 20, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 20, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on with NT/TLA (NT or also referred to as therapy with local anesthetics (TLA) )

3
Subscribe