Titrated Oral Misoprostol Compared to Vaginal Dinoprostone for Induction of Labor

February 17, 2014 updated by: Sherif Essam, Ain Shams University

Titrated Oral Misoprostol Compared to Vaginal Dinoprostone for Induction of Labor: a Randomized Control Trial

To test the safety and efficacy of titrated oral misoprostol compared to vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  • There are many indications for induction of labor in the obstetric practice, of which prolonged gestational age stands as the most common indication. It is well recognized that with an unripe cervix, induction may be difficult and often unsuccessful. The use of an agent to ripen the cervix prior to induction is acceptable in the modern practice.
  • Misoprostol, a prostaglandin E1 analogue, is the most interesting alternative to Dinoprostone because of its effectiveness, low cost, and temperature stability. It ripens the cervix by inducing regular uterine contractions. However, it is associated with several adverse effects especially uterine hyperstimulation, which is painful and may result in fetal compromise.
  • Testing the efficacy and safety of titrated oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone may develop a new safe and effective method for labor induction.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11666
        • Recruiting
        • New Maternity Hospital - Ain Shams university
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sherif E Daoud, MB.Bch. Msc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Single vertex presentation.
  • Gestational age > 37 weeks calculated from last menstrual period or U/S scanning.
  • Bishop score <8 .
  • Not in labor.
  • Reassuring fetal heart rate (CTG for 20 min on the day of induction).
  • Valid indication for Induction of labor.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Gestational age <37 weeks.
  • Patients with rupture of membranes.
  • Previous uterine scar.
  • Fetal malpresentation.
  • Multiple pregnancy.
  • Significant antepartum hemorrhage
  • Uncontrolled DM.
  • Severe Pre-eclampsia or Eclampsia
  • If there are contraindications to receive the drugs, e.g. allergy, history of severe asthma,…..etc.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cases
A dose of 20ug is required obtained by dissolving the 200ug tablet (Misotac® Sigma Pharmaceutical Industries) in 200 ml water (1ug per ml), the solution is shaked well before each administration. The solution will be orally administrated every two hours (max. 12 hrs) until adequate uterine contractions obtained (3 per 10 minutes each lasting 40-60 seconds) and then stopped. The initial dose will be increased to 40 ml (40ug) after two doses if there are no contractions. The timing and strength of contractions will be assessed by abdominal palpation. If the contractions are inadequate, augmentation of the active phase of labor will be attempted by hourly-titrated oral misoprostol (20 ml) +/- amniotomy.
The solution will be orally administrated every two hours (maximum 12 hours) until adequate uterine contractions obtained (3 per 10 minutes each lasting 40-60 seconds) and then stopped. The initial dose of 20 ml (20 ug) will be increased to 40 ml (40ug) after two doses if there are no contractions. The timing and strength of contractions will be assessed by abdominal palpation. If the contractions are inadequate, augmentation of the active phase of labor will be attempted by hourly-titrated oral misoprostol (20 ml) +/- amniotomy. If the uterine contractions are judged to be adequate, the next dose of misoprostol will be omitted.
Other Names:
  • Misotac (Misoprostol)
Active Comparator: Control
Dinoprostone 3 mg (Dinoglandin® Alexandria Co. for Pharmaceuticals) will be inserted in the posterior vaginal fornix and repeated after six hours if contractions are inadequate (i.e. two doses maximum). If the contractions become inadequate, augmentation of the active phase of labor will be attempted by Syntocinon (oxytocin) infusion +/- amniotomy.
Dinoprostone 3 mg (Dinoglandin® Alexandria Co. for Pharmaceuticals) will be inserted in the posterior vaginal fornix and repeated after six hours if contractions are inadequate (i.e. two doses maximum). If the contractions become inadequate, augmentation of the active phase of labor will be attempted by Syntocinon (oxytocin) infusion +/- amniotomy.
Other Names:
  • Dinoglandin®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Induction delivery interval i.e. Time from start of medication till delivery
Time Frame: 24 hours
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients delivered vaginally within the first 24 hours
Time Frame: 24 hours
24 hours
Time from start of labor augmentation by either misoprostol or Syntocinon (oxytocin) to active phase of labor
Time Frame: 12 hours
12 hours
Duration of 1st,2nd and 3rd stages of labor
Time Frame: 24 hours
24 hours
Maternal complications
Time Frame: 24 hours
uterine hyperstimulation, postpartum hemorrhage, uterine rupture, sepsis, shivering, headache, nausea, vomiting, and retained placenta.
24 hours
Mode of delivery
Time Frame: 24 hours
Vaginal , instrumental or Cesarean section
24 hours
Neonatal outcome
Time Frame: 24 hours
Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admission
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Amr H Yehia, MD, MRCOG, Ain shams university

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 15, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 19, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2014

Last Verified

February 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Medical Induction of Labor Affecting Fetus

Clinical Trials on Misotac® Sigma Pharmaceutical Industries

Subscribe