- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04102384
Usability and Satisfaction With an Electronic Survey Administration Application in General Population (CePRO)
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are vital to understanding the impact of a medical condition and treatment from the participant's perspective. However, the collection of data can be inconsistent in both administration and completion due to the method of delivery. Thus, careful consideration of the data collection mode is needed to ensure the quality of the data. The method of delivery has been shown to have a direct effect on the survey response rates thereby ensuring the validity of the data analyses and results. Previous studies have demonstrated an increase in Web-based survey response rates as compared to paper-based survey response rates. Novel methods of collecting PROs may help to streamline both the process and collection of PROs during clinical trials.
A potential differentiating factor between delivering surveys via smart phone and other electronic modes of delivery is the perceived advantage of being able to conveniently complete survey questionnaires at any time and any location. This could help address certain limitations of the quantitative survey method such as recall bias. Furthermore, the portability, connectivity and ubiquity of smartphones may reduce the amount of training or instructions required for users to complete a survey questionnaire on a smartphone. For researchers, this type of survey delivery method may offer the benefits of a wider target audience and reduce research implementation costs. The e-PRO app is designed to further facilitate the delivery of PRO instruments in a convenient manner to participants. Through its computing capability, and user-friendly interface, the e-PRO app can collect data and implement complex scoring requirements, thus supporting the delivery of self-administered survey questionnaires. The goal of this two-arm randomized controlled pilot is to explore the usability and satisfaction with a novel e-PRO app.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Ramya S Palacholla, MD, MPH
- Phone Number: 617-724-0428
- Email: RPALACHOLLA@mgh.harvard.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Amanda J Centi, P.h.D
- Phone Number: 617-724-2158
- Email: ACENTI@PARTNERS.ORG
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
- Partners HealthCare
-
Contact:
- Amanda J Centi, P.h.D
- Phone Number: 617-724-2158
- Email: ACENTI@PARTNERS.ORG
-
Contact:
- Ramya S Palacholla, M.D, M.P.H
- Phone Number: 617-724-0428
- Email: RPALACHOLLA@mgh.harvard.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy participants over the age of 18-65 years as assessed by the Self-Rated Health Measure.
- Fluency in English language to be able to read, understand study procedures and complete surveys administered during the study.
- Willing to travel to the downtown Boston area to participate in up to two study visits.
- Willing to participate in the research study and sign informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants with a "fair" or "poor" rating on the Self-Rated Health Measure.
- Participants with EU citizenship or permanent residency
- Participants with severe cognitive, vision, hearing, or speech problems that may prevent them from answering surveys
- Participants with serious psychiatric conditions (moderate or major depressive disorder that may impair their ability to complete surveys
- Participants with any terminal illness (e.g. cancers)
- Patients with implantable devices, pacemakers or body worn electronic medical devices
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Control Group
Participants will be enrolled for a period of 4 weeks.
At baseline, we will collect demographic information on participants.
During the study, participants will be asked to fill out daily and weekly surveys using an electronically link sent via email.
Additionally, participants will be asked to fill out one survey once a week during the study period.
|
|
Experimental: Intervention Group
Participants will be enrolled for a period of 4 weeks.
At baseline, we will collect demographic information on participants.
During the study, participants will be asked to fill out daily and weekly surveys using the e-PRO app.
Additionally, participants will be asked to fill out one survey once a week during the study period.
A subgroup of these participants will be asked to complete an additional interview to collect more information on their experiences using the mobile app.
|
The e-PRO app is designed to further facilitate the delivery of PRO instruments in a convenient manner to participants.
Through its computing capability, and user-friendly interface, the e-PRO app can collect data and implement complex scoring requirements, thus supporting the delivery of self-administered survey questionnaires.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Usability of e-PRO vs. emailed link: survey
Time Frame: At close-out
|
A survey will be administered to compare groups on their experiences with the survey-method administration (Investigator developed survey).
The following components will be taken into account: acceptability-- participant satisfaction with various aspects of the solution (e.g.
content, complexity, comfort, delivery, and credibility).
Adoption-- participants' intention to try; perceived barriers and facilitators for uptake.
Appropriateness-- participant's perceived relevance to need; suitability to daily patient workflow.
Feasibility-- suitability for using daily, weekly etc.
This survey is not a scored survey.
|
At close-out
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Survey response rate e-PRO vs emailed link
Time Frame: At close-out
|
Response rate will be tracked on a weekly basis from the e-PRO system and the REDCap embedded email link to compare response rate between the control and intervention group.
The AAOPR (2006) recommendation for RR formula will be used to calculate the RR.
This is the number of completed surveys (completed and partially completed) divided by the number of completed surveys (completed and partially completed) plus the number of all non-completed surveys (sent to a potential participant but not completed because of incorrect e-mail address, incorrect mailing address, or other reasons).
|
At close-out
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ramya S Palacholla, MD, MPH, Partners HealthCare
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2019P002811
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Healthy
-
Prevent Age Resort "Pervaya Liniya"RecruitingHealthy Aging | Healthy Diet | Healthy LifestyleRussian Federation
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterCompletedHealthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy AdultsNetherlands
-
Yale UniversityNot yet recruitingHealth-related Benefits of Introducing Table Olives Into the Diet of Young Adults: Olives For HealthHealthy Diet | Healthy Lifestyle | Healthy Nutrition | CholesterolUnited States
-
Hasselt UniversityRecruitingHealthy | Healthy AgingBelgium
-
Galera Therapeutics, Inc.Syneos HealthCompleted
-
Galera Therapeutics, Inc.Syneos HealthCompletedHealthy | Healthy VolunteersAustralia
-
University of PennsylvaniaActive, not recruitingHealthy | Healthy AgingUnited States
-
Chalmers University of TechnologyGöteborg UniversityCompletedHealthy | Nutrition, HealthySweden
-
University of ManitobaNot yet recruitingHealthy | Healthy Diet
Clinical Trials on e-PRO App
-
Comprehensive Support Project for Oncology ResearchActive, not recruitingStomach Cancer | Breast Cancer | Colorectal Cancer | Ovarian Cancer | Lung Cancer | Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck | Endometrial Cancer | Liver CancerJapan
-
CHU de ReimsNot yet recruitingIntermittent ClaudicationFrance
-
CellMedX CorporationNutrasource Pharmaceutical and Nutraceutical Services, Inc.Completed
-
Luis María Béjar PradoRecruitingHealthy Eating Index | Mediterranean Diet | Diet HabitsSpain
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityUnknownAnxiety | CaregiversHong Kong
-
BBraun Medical SASRecruiting
-
Jens EcksteinPreventicus GmbHCompleted
-
Akdeniz UniversityAntalya Training and Research HospitalRecruitingQuality of Life | Obesity | Complication | eHealth | Bariatric Surgery | Mobile Health | Self ManagementTurkey
-
International Institute of Rescue Research and...Unknown
-
Bekasi City Public HospitalUniversity of GroningenCompletedTuberculosis | Mobile Phone Use | Human Immunodeficiency Virus | Adult | Interpersonal RelationsIndonesia