Meniscal Lesions in Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (LCA-40)

September 30, 2021 updated by: Biagio Moretti, MD, University of Bari

Retrospective Cohort Study on How Meniscal Lesions Affect Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Non-professional Athletes

Most athletes who undergo Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) plan to return to some level of sporting (RTS) activity. However, rates of return to pre-injury sport are often less than might be expected and many factors influence whether individuals return to sport after this surgery. This study aims to better understand the role of meniscal lesions in RTS and to assess the advantage of the integrated evaluation with clinical, biomechanical and psychological tests to decide the correct RTS timing in non-professional athletes undergoing ACLR.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Twenty non-professional athletes with acute ACL injury were recruited in the Orthopaedic and Trauma Unit of University Hospital of Bari. All the patients underwent an all-inside semitendinosus (ST) tendon autograft ACLR with Arthrex TightRope cortical fixation.

The clinical outcomes (modified Cincinnati Rating System Questionnaire (mCRSQ), Tegner Activity Level Score (TALS), Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (TLKSS)), the self-reported psychological scores (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) and the ACL Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) score) and biomechanical outcomes (stability, jump, coordination and fatigue tests) were assessed postoperatively at 18 months.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • IT
      • Bari, IT, Italy, 70124
        • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All the patients has been enrolled according to the eligible criteria in Orthopaedic and Trauma Unit of University Hospital of Bari

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged 18-35 years old
  • non professional athletes
  • ACLR between January 2017 and December 2017
  • all-inside semitendinosus (ST) tendon autograft ACLR with Arthrex TightRope cortical fixation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • diabetes
  • BMI > 30 kg/m2
  • heart disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between TSK, ACL-RSI Score and mCRSQ Score
Time Frame: 18-months

Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia is a 17 item questionnaire used to assess the subjective rating of kinesiophobia or fear of movement. A score of 17 is the lowest possible score, and indicates no kinesiophobia or negligible. A score of 68 is the highest possible score and indicates extreme fear of pain with movement.

ACL Return to Sport after Injury measures the patient's understanding of his knee. It comprises 12 questions with a score of 1 to 10 for each. It is considered that for a normal population without knee condition, the score is between 80 and 90%.

modified Cincinnati Rating System Questionnaire has been designed to give your therapist information as to how your knee pain has affected your ability to manage in everyday life. It consists of 12 questions, 8 of which are included in the summary score. The total score is calculated as the sum of all questions responses, with 100 representing the best/excellent knee function, and 0 representing the worst/poor knee function.

18-months
Correlation between clinical and psychological features
Time Frame: 18-months
Clinical assessment consist of three tests carried on during medical check-up: i) active and passive Range Of Motion (ROM); ii) anterior drawer test; iii) knee's alignment. All these measurements will be transformed in categorical variables in order to perform chi square test.
18-months
Association between clinical features and level of stability
Time Frame: 18-months

Clinical assessment consist of three tests carried on during medical check-up: i) active and passive Range Of Motion (ROM); ii) anterior drawer test; iii) knee's alignment. All these measurements will be transformed in categorical variables.

During the stability test, the patient stands with one and two legs respectively on a free to move balance disc for 30 seconds. Subjects were instructed to stand in the centre with their arms at their sides. Level of stability is defined as an index ranking from 1 (low stability) to 5 (high stability).

Eta square between categorical variables from clinical assessment and the measure outcomes of biomechanical assessment will be performed.

18-months
Association between clinical features and limb symmetry index
Time Frame: 18-months

Clinical assessment consist of three tests carried on during medical check-up: i) active and passive Range Of Motion (ROM); ii) anterior drawer test; iii) knee's alignment. All these measurements will be transformed in categorical variables.

During jump tests, the subject carried a belt around their hips, and the sensor was placed above the greater trochanter of the hip. Before jumping, the subject had to stand in an upright and still position. A sequence of four different jumps has been executed. The limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated by dividing the measured value of the injured leg by the value of the non-affected side and multiplying by 100.

Eta square between categorical variables from clinical assessment and the time required to perform the test will be calculated.

18-months
Association between clinical features and Coordination Time
Time Frame: 18-months

Clinical assessment consist of three tests carried on during medical check-up: i) active and passive Range Of Motion (ROM); ii) anterior drawer test; iii) knee's alignment. All these measurements will be transformed in categorical variables.

The subject performed one-footed jumps through the course of red (forward-backward-forward jumps) and blue (sideway jumps) hurdles, completing 16 jumps. This had to be performed as quickly as possible by jumping on one leg without a rest between the hurdles.

Eta square between categorical variables from clinical assessment and the time required to perform the test will be calculated.

18-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Odds ratio between presence of ML and CLIMB-based criteria
Time Frame: 18-months
The CLIMB battery is the combination of biomechanical, clinical and psychological criteria which could allow to return to sport with the lowest possible risk of reinjury. After performing a correlation matrix and calculating collinearity using linear regression, we will calculate odds ratio as measure of association for presence-absence of meniscal lesion in the observed cohort.
18-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lorenzo Moretti, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 21, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sport Injury

Clinical Trials on Clinical, self-reported psychological and biomechanical assessments

Subscribe