The Impact of Perioperative Transfusion on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction

August 7, 2023 updated by: Yon Hee Shim, Gangnam Severance Hospital

The Impact of Perioperative Restrictive Transfusion on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Elderly Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery

Although blood transfusion is a representative treatment for acute anemia due to blood loss during surgery, it is also a powerful risk factor for postoperative cognitive dysfunction.

'Restrictive transfusion', which transfusions minimal red blood cells, is not only useful for conserving limited blood resources, but also does not worsen prognosis or mortality after surgery. Research has also been reported that severe restrictive transfusion has improved prognosis and mortality.

However, anemia is also one of the risk factors for postoperative complications, including neurocognitive impairment, it is still controversial how much anemia should be allowed in elderly people who are sensitive to ischemia or heart disease.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the restrictive transfusion policy reduces the frequency of postoperative cognitive dysfunction than the liberal transfusion policy in patients aged 65 years or older who undergo lumbar interbody fusion.

Restrictive transfusion strategy (which initiates transfusion when hemoglobin level is less than 8 g / dL during perioperative period) // liberal transfusion strategy (which initiates transfusion when hemoglobin level is less than 10 g / dL during perioperative period)

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The Aim of this study was to compare the frequency of postoperative cognitive dysfunction diagnosed 7 days after surgery between two groups.

K-MOCA (Korean-Montreal Cognitive Assessment) is used to evaluate cognitive dysfunction. In addition, plasma inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-6) and GFAP reflecting brain damage were measured before and after surgery to determine whether brain injury caused by systemic inflammatory response is associated with cognitive dysfunction

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

148

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 06273
        • Recruiting
        • Gangnam Severance Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 100 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients 65 years of age or older who receive more than two levels of lumbar interbody fusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • If patients have anemia (Hb is less than 13 g / dL for men and less than 12 g / dL for women)
  • Those who cannot read the agreement (illiteracy, foreigner, etc.)
  • Have a history of taking medication for mental illness
  • Communication disorders due to neurological diseases (dementia, stroke, seizures, etc.)
  • Less than 23 points on K-MoCA test
  • When fluid loading and volulyte are difficult due to kidney disease
  • Limited blood transfusion due to heart disease
  • Refusal of blood transfusions (religious reasons, etc.)
  • patients who have received a blood transfusion within 6 weeks prior to surgery
  • If continuous observation is impossible after surgery
  • Emergency surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: restrictive
In the restrictive blood transfusion group, if the hemoglobin value is less than 8 g /dL or if there are suspected symptoms of anemia such as dizziness or chest pain, headache, low on energy, blood transfusion is started.
In the restrictive blood transfusion group, if the hemoglobin value is less than 8 g /dL or if there are suspected symptoms of anemia such as dizziness or chest pain, headache, low on energy, blood transfusion is started. in the liberal transfusion group, If the hemoglobin value is less than 10 g /dL, blood transfusions begin.
Experimental: Liberal
In the liberal transfusion group, If the hemoglobin value is less than 10 g /dL, blood transfusions begin.
In the restrictive blood transfusion group, if the hemoglobin value is less than 8 g /dL or if there are suspected symptoms of anemia such as dizziness or chest pain, headache, low on energy, blood transfusion is started. in the liberal transfusion group, If the hemoglobin value is less than 10 g /dL, blood transfusions begin.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparing the frequency of post-operative cognitive dysfunction diagnosed on the 7th day after surgery
Time Frame: 7th day after surgery (POD 7)
On the day before the surgery and the seventh day after the surgery, the patient scan K-MOCA (Korean-Montreal Cognitive Assessment). If the difference between the preoperative test results and the post-operative test results is RCI (Reliable Change Index) <-1.96, it is determined that cognitive dysfunction occurred.
7th day after surgery (POD 7)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yonhee Shim, Gangnam Severance Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 8, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 14, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anemia

Clinical Trials on blood transfusion

3
Subscribe