- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04328051
Influence of the Implant-prosthetic Connection in the Marginal Bone Loss and Bacterial Leakage
Influence of the Implant-prosthetic Connection in the Marginal Bone Loss and Bacterial Leakage. A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Location: This study is going to take place in the Dentistry Hospital of the University of Barcelona (Campus of Bellvitge).
Study subjects: The sample (105 patients) consists of patients with single tooth edentulous spaces or posterior maxillary and/or mandible edentulous spaces in need of dental implants with screw-retained single fixed crowns. All of them are being properly informed about the study according to the Comité Ético (CEIC) del Hospital Odontològic Universitat de Barcelona guidelines, and informed consent must be signed prior to the interventions.
Material: Registration papers for the study, dental implants, surgery material, prosthetic components, Florida Probe Software®, Periapical x-rays, computer, Software Stata 14 and Software ImageJ®.
Determinations: Clinical, radiographic and microbiologic measures since implant placement, prosthesis placement and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after it.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Laura Rubianes-Porta, DDS, MS
- Phone Number: +34630873804
- Email: od074964@uic.es
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Octavi J. Camps-Font, DDS, MS
- Phone Number: +34665980569
Study Locations
-
-
Catalunya
-
L'Hospitalet De Llobregat, Catalunya, Spain, 08903
- Recruiting
- University of Barcelona
-
Contact:
- Octavi Camps-Font, DDS, MS
- Phone Number: +34665980569
- Email: occafo@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Rui Figueiredo, DDS, MS, PhD
- Phone Number: +34667378126
- Email: ruipfigueiredo@hotmail.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Roxana Ghiorghiu, DDS, MS
-
Principal Investigator:
- Laura Rubianes-Porta, DDS, MS
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Anna Piñol-Olea, DDS, MS
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects who accept signing voluntarily the informed consent before doing any action related to the study.
- ≥18-years-old patients.
- Edentulous single spaces or edentulous posterior maxilla or mandible (from the first premolar to the second molar) with screw-retained single fixed crowns.
- Single implants successfully osseointegrated placed at least 16 weeks post-extraction.
- O'Leary plaque index and or bleeding on probing ≤25%.
- Dental implants with screwed-retained prosthesis.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Systemic diseases that can interfere dental implant placement.
- Any contraindication for surgery procedures.
- Heavy smokers (> 20cig/day).
- Background of drug abuse or other factors such as psychiatric diseases that, in opinion of the examiner, could interfere with the ability of the patient to cooperate and compliment with the study.
- Patients who have had participated with another clinical trial the last 30 days.
- Pregnant women or in lactation.
- Patients with bad oral hygiene or not motivated.
- Probing pockets depths with bleeding of ≥4 mm on a tooth adjacent to the edentulous space.
- Guided bone regeneration required in the same time of the implant placement.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Ocean E.C.®, Avinent Implant System S.L.
Dental implant with geometry adapted to the biologic architecture of the bone, with platform switching with a positive angle and machined surface with micro-threads in the cervical region.
Asymmetric and progressive threads in its body with a double thread pitch.
Point-ratio geometry on its apical region, Biomimetic Advanced Surface and external hexagon connection.
|
Antibiotic prophylaxis will be done.
After rinsing with 0.12 % chlorhexidine, patients will receive local anaesthesia.
A crestal incision will be done and a mucoperiostic flap will be raised.
As the commercial specifies, progressive diameter drills will be used under constant sterile saline irrigation to prepare the implant site.
Once finished the drilling sequence, one investigator will open the opaque envelope to know which type of implant, depending on the connection, has to be placed by the surgeon.
Dental implant will be placed crestally and depending if it has primary stability or not, it will be leaded submerged or non-submerged.
The flap will be repositioned and sutured without tension with 4/0 polyamide.
Postoperative instructions and medication will be prescribed and explained.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Ocean I.C.®, Avinent Implant System S.L.
Dental implant with geometry adapted to the biologic architecture of the bone, with platform switching with a positive angle and machined surface with micro-threads in the cervical region.
Asymmetric and progressive threads in its body with a double thread pitch.
Point-ratio geometry on its apical region, Biomimetic Advanced Surface and internal hexagon connection.
|
Antibiotic prophylaxis will be done.
After rinsing with 0.12 % chlorhexidine, patients will receive local anaesthesia.
A crestal incision will be done and a mucoperiostic flap will be raised.
As the commercial specifies, progressive diameter drills will be used under constant sterile saline irrigation to prepare the implant site.
Once finished the drilling sequence, one investigator will open the opaque envelope to know which type of implant, depending on the connection, has to be placed by the surgeon.
Dental implant will be placed crestally and depending if it has primary stability or not, it will be leaded submerged or non-submerged.
The flap will be repositioned and sutured without tension with 4/0 polyamide.
Postoperative instructions and medication will be prescribed and explained.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Ocean C.C.®, Avinent Implant System S.L.
Dental implant with geometry adapted to the biologic architecture of the bone, with platform switching with a positive angle and machined surface with micro-threads in the cervical region.
Asymmetric and progressive threads in its body with a double thread pitch.
Point-ratio geometry on its apical region, Biomimetic Advanced Surface and conical connection.
|
Antibiotic prophylaxis will be done.
After rinsing with 0.12 % chlorhexidine, patients will receive local anaesthesia.
A crestal incision will be done and a mucoperiostic flap will be raised.
As the commercial specifies, progressive diameter drills will be used under constant sterile saline irrigation to prepare the implant site.
Once finished the drilling sequence, one investigator will open the opaque envelope to know which type of implant, depending on the connection, has to be placed by the surgeon.
Dental implant will be placed crestally and depending if it has primary stability or not, it will be leaded submerged or non-submerged.
The flap will be repositioned and sutured without tension with 4/0 polyamide.
Postoperative instructions and medication will be prescribed and explained.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Vertical Marginal Bone Loss (VMBL)
Time Frame: Since implant placement (Timing 0) through study completion (Timing 5), an average of 1 year.
|
Distance in millimetres between the implant platform and the point of the intra-bone defect that is more apical.
|
Since implant placement (Timing 0) through study completion (Timing 5), an average of 1 year.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Vertical Marginal Bone Loss Tax
Time Frame: 12 months after prosthesis placement.
|
Vertical bone loss in millimetres per implant and unit of time.
|
12 months after prosthesis placement.
|
Early implant failure
Time Frame: Since implant placement (Timing 0) through prosthesis placement (Timing 1).
|
Implant with mobility or failure of the osseointegration process before the prosthesis placement.
|
Since implant placement (Timing 0) through prosthesis placement (Timing 1).
|
Late implant failure
Time Frame: Since prosthesis placement (Timing 1) through study completion (Timing 5), an average of 1 year.
|
Implant with mobility or failure of the osseointegration process after the prosthesis placement.
|
Since prosthesis placement (Timing 1) through study completion (Timing 5), an average of 1 year.
|
Probing pocket depth
Time Frame: Since prosthesis placement (Timing 1) through study completion (Timing 5), an average of 1 year.
|
Distance in millimetres from the gingival margin to the bottom of the periodontal pocket measured with the periodontal probe.
Determined in six points per tooth or implant (Buccal: mesial, medial and distal.
Palatal or lingual: mesial, medial and distal).
|
Since prosthesis placement (Timing 1) through study completion (Timing 5), an average of 1 year.
|
Mucosal recession
Time Frame: Since prosthesis placement (Timing 1) through study completion (Timing 5), an average of 1 year.
|
Distance in millimetres from the cemento-enamel junction of the tooth or from the implant platform to the gingival margin when it is located apically.
Determined in six points per tooth or implant (Buccal: mesial, medial and distal.
Palatal or lingual: mesial, medial and distal).
|
Since prosthesis placement (Timing 1) through study completion (Timing 5), an average of 1 year.
|
Mucosal hyperplasia
Time Frame: Since prosthesis placement (Timing 1) through study completion (Timing 5), an average of 1 year.
|
Distance in millimetres from the gingival margin to the cemento-enamel junction of the tooth or to the implant platform when the gingiva is located more coronal than them.
Determined in six points per tooth or implant (Buccal: mesial, medial and distal.
Palatal or lingual: mesial, medial and distal).
|
Since prosthesis placement (Timing 1) through study completion (Timing 5), an average of 1 year.
|
Clinical attachment level
Time Frame: Since prosthesis placement (Timing 1) through study completion (Timing 5), an average of 1 year.
|
Probing pocket depth (mm) plus the recession (mm) or probing pocket depth minus the hyperplasia (mm).
Determined in six points per tooth or implant (Buccal: mesial, medial and distal.
Palatal or lingual: mesial, medial and distal).
|
Since prosthesis placement (Timing 1) through study completion (Timing 5), an average of 1 year.
|
O'Leary plaque index
Time Frame: First visit
|
Plaque presence in the dentogingival or implantogingival union.
Determined in four points per tooth or implant (Buccal: mesial, medial and distal.
Palatal or lingual).
Expressed as the percentage (%) of tooth or implant surfaces with plaque presence divided with the total of tooth or implant surfaces in mouth and multiplied per 100.
|
First visit
|
Bleeding on probing
Time Frame: Since first visit through study completion (Timing 5), an average of 1 year.
|
Presence of blood in the gingival margin after determining the probing pocket depth.
Determined in six points per tooth or implant (Buccal: mesial, medial and distal.
Palatal or lingual: mesial, medial and distal).
Expressed as the percentage (%) of tooth or implant surfaces with blood divided with the total of tooth or implant surfaces in mouth and multiplied per 100.
|
Since first visit through study completion (Timing 5), an average of 1 year.
|
Suppuration on probing
Time Frame: Since first visit through study completion (Timing 5), an average of 1 year.
|
Presence of purulent material in the gingival margin after determining the probing pocket depth.
Determined in six points per tooth or implant (Buccal: mesial, medial and distal.
Palatal or lingual: mesial, medial and distal).
Expressed as the percentage (%) of tooth or implant surfaces with pus divided with the total of tooth or implant surfaces in mouth and multiplied per 100.
|
Since first visit through study completion (Timing 5), an average of 1 year.
|
Prosthetic complications
Time Frame: Since prosthesis placement (Timing 1) through study completion (Timing 5), an average of 1 year.
|
Screw (which connects the crown with the implant) fracture or prosthesis fracture, chipping of the ceramic prosthesis, loosening of the screw (which connects the crown with the implant) or any other prosthetic components.
|
Since prosthesis placement (Timing 1) through study completion (Timing 5), an average of 1 year.
|
Bacterial leakage
Time Frame: 12 months after prosthesis placement.
|
Quantitative PCR in real time to determine the total amount of bacteria and in particular, of 10 pathogenic species: Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythensis, Treponema denticola, Prevotella intermedia, Peptostreptococcus micros, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Campylobacter rectus, Eikenella corrodens and Candida albicans.
|
12 months after prosthesis placement.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Rui Figueiredo, DDS, MS, PhD, University of Barcelona
- Principal Investigator: Octavi Camps-Font, DDS, MS, University of Barcelona
- Study Chair: Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón, DDS, MS, PhD, University of Barcelona
- Principal Investigator: Roxana Ghiorghiu, DDS, MS, University of Barcelona
- Principal Investigator: Laura Rubianes-Porta, DDS, MS, University of Barcelona
- Principal Investigator: Anna Piñol-Olea, DDS, MS, University of Barcelona
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986 Summer;1(1):11-25. No abstract available.
- Derks J, Tomasi C. Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Apr;42 Suppl 16:S158-71. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12334.
- Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3(2):81-100. doi: 10.3109/02844316909036699. No abstract available.
- Albrektsson T, Donos N; Working Group 1. Implant survival and complications. The Third EAO consensus conference 2012. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:63-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02557.x.
- Buser D, Ingimarsson S, Dula K, Lussi A, Hirt HP, Belser UC. Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Apr;22(2):109-17.
- Oh TJ, Yoon J, Misch CE, Wang HL. The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science? J Periodontol. 2002 Mar;73(3):322-33. doi: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.3.322.
- Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992 Sep;3(3):104-11. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030302.x.
- Malevez C, Hermans M, Daelemans P. Marginal bone levels at Branemark system implants used for single tooth restoration. The influence of implant design and anatomical region. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996 Jun;7(2):162-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070210.x.
- Vidyasagar L, Apse P. Dental implant design and biological effects on bone implant interface. Baltic Dent Maxillofac J. 2004;6:51-4.
- Isidor F. Influence of forces on peri-implant bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:8-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01360.x.
- Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. Effects of different implant surfaces and designs on marginal bone-level alterations: a review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:207-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01783.x.
- Koo KT, Lee EJ, Kim JY, Seol YJ, Han JS, Kim TI, Lee YM, Ku Y, Wikesjo UM, Rhyu IC. The effect of internal versus external abutment connection modes on crestal bone changes around dental implants: a radiographic analysis. J Periodontol. 2012 Sep;83(9):1104-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110456. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
- Nishioka RS, de Vasconcellos LG, de Melo Nishioka GN. Comparative strain gauge analysis of external and internal hexagon, Morse taper, and influence of straight and offset implant configuration. Implant Dent. 2011 Apr;20(2):e24-32. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318211fce8.
- Lin MI, Shen YW, Huang HL, Hsu JT, Fuh LJ. A retrospective study of implant-abutment connections on crestal bone level. J Dent Res. 2013 Dec;92(12 Suppl):202S-7S. doi: 10.1177/0022034513510322. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
- Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Grondahl K, Engquist E, Feldmann H. Astra Tech and Branemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Aug;15(4):413-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01028.x.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- UBarcelonaOralSurgery2
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Bacterial Infections
-
Sir Run Run Shaw HospitalUniversity of BirminghamUnknown
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
GlaxoSmithKlineWithdrawn
-
GlaxoSmithKlineWithdrawn
Clinical Trials on Dental Implant Placement
-
Hospital General Universitario Morales MeseguerNot yet recruiting
-
Università Vita-Salute San RaffaeleCompleted
-
Aula Dental AvanzadaRecruiting
-
PerioCentrum ResearchUnknownImplant Geometry, Osseointegration, Soft Tissue Volume, Marginal Bone Levels, Soft Tissue Recession, Volumetric AnalysisSpain
-
UConn HealthDentsply Astra techCompletedImplant Survival Using Immediate Loading ProtocolUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRecruitingX-linked HypophosphatemiaFrance
-
Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & HospitalCompleted
-
Universidade Federal de GoiasInstitut Straumann AG; ITI International Team for Implantology, SwitzerlandNot yet recruitingImplant Complication | Edentulous Jaw
-
Berceste GulerCompletedDental Implant Failed | Bone Loss, AlveolarTurkey
-
University of OklahomaZimmer BiometActive, not recruitingEdentulous Alveolar RidgeUnited States