Psychological Impact of COVID19 Among Doctors in Assiut University Hospitals

July 6, 2020 updated by: Mariam Roshdy Elkhayat, Assiut University
study aimed to investigate the psychological impact of corona virus among doctor in Assiut University Hospitals, mainly stress and burn out will be assessed

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Prolonged exposure to stressful working environments resulting in a state of physical and emotional depletion and burnout. Nowadays, while facing corona virus, health care workers are on the front line and directly assist in diagnosis, caring and treatment of patients with COVID, thus keeping them at higher risk developing psychological distress and other mental health symptoms.

According to previous studies, during the outbreaks of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), frontline medical staff had reported high levels of stress that resulted in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

A lot of factors contribute to increase mental effect among healthcare workers as increasing the suspected cases and workload , depletion of personal protective equipment's , drug shortage and feeling inadequately supported .

In Toronto study(2008), four major risk factors for stress among medical staff during the SARS outbreak were identified; including the perception of the medical of their risk of infection, the impact of SARS on their work, feelings of depression, and working in high-risk medical units. moreover, there are other factors as social stigmatization and contact with infected patients, also has previously been shown to be associated with increased levels of stress and anxiety in medical staff .

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

250

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Doctors currently working in Assiut University Hospitals in all titles: resident doctors, assistant lecturer, lecturer, assistant professor and professor

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all doctors currently working in assiut University hospitals

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no exclusion critiria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The MBI-HSS (MP) addresses three scales:Emotional Exhaustion ,Depersonalization and Personal Accomplishment
Time Frame: baseline

Emotional Exhaustion measures feelings of being emotionally overextended and exhausted by one's work.

Depersonalization measures an unfeeling and impersonal response toward patients.

Personal Accomplishment measures feelings of competence and successful achievement in one's work.

All MBI items are scored using a 7 level frequency scale from "never" to "daily." Initial development had 3 components: emotional exhaustion (9 items), depersonalization (5 items) and personal achievement (8 items). Each scale measures its own unique dimension of burnout

baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
GHQ-12 questionnaire for measuring of current mental health
Time Frame: baseline

The scale asks whether the respondent has experienced a particular symptom or behavior recently. Each item is rated on a four-point scale (less than usual, no more than usual, rather more than usual, or much more than usual); and for example when using the GHQ-12 it gives a total score of 36 or 12 based on the selected scoring methods.

it measure social dysfunction, anxiety and depression and loss of confidence

baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

July 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • pshycological impact COVID19

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Occupational Stress

Clinical Trials on maslach burnout inventory questionnair

3
Subscribe