Burn Out and Quality of Life at French General Practioners

October 21, 2019 updated by: Albert TRINH-DUC

Burn Out and Quality of Life at French General Practioners: is There a Link

The suffering of caregivers is constantly increasing. General medicine, because of its primary role in primary care, is particularly exposed to the risk of burn-out and must protect itself. The aim of this study was to find an inverse relationship between health-related quality of life and being severely burned by French general practitioners.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

descriptive quantitative cross-sectional study

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Agen, France, 47000
        • Centre Hospitalier St ESPRIT

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All french general practitioner in activity

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • french general practitioner in liberal activity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • retired doctor
  • junior general practioner

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assesment of Burn-out
Time Frame: 30 days

Maslach Burn-out Inventory scale, 22 Items sort to 0 (never) at 6 (every day) 3 class : An emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization (DP) and a reduction of personal accomplishment (AP)

  • The emotional exhaustion (when emotional resources are exhausted, when the workers can no longer give their best, psychologically speaking.)
  • The Depersonalization (reflects withdrawal, indifference to work)
  • The lose of personal accomplishment (devaluation, negative self-evaluation at work)

Our study focused on severe burn-out, defined by the combination of high EE and DP scores and low AP scores:

  • A high EE is defined by a score > 30
  • A high PD is defined by a score > 12
  • A low PA is defined by a score < 33.
30 days
Assesment quality of life: Dukes Scale
Time Frame: 30 days

The Duke Health Profile 17 items questionnaire. It assesses health-related quality of life and has 10 dimensions.

The score of each of the 10 dimensions matches with the sum of the item scores, standardized from 0 to 100:

  • For the 6 health scores (general, physical, mental, social, perceived health and self-esteem) 100 specifies the best HRQoL,
  • For the 4 scores of the dysfunction dimension (anxiety, depression, pain, disability), 100 specifies the most significant dysfunction
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Socio-demographic data
Time Frame: 30 days
  • age, (years)
  • sex, (female, male)
  • children, (children number)
30 days
Mode of practice
Time Frame: 30 days
  • mode of practice (alone, group, liberal..),
  • the number of hours worked, (hours)
  • the number of monthly guards, (months)
  • the number of daily acts, (acts number)
  • the number of weeks of annual leave, (weeks)
30 days
Leisure time
Time Frame: 30 days
  • he practice of a sports or leisure activity, (yes, not)
  • he presence or absence of a work stoppage during the last twelve months (weeks)
  • the duration, the need to have had to adjust his working time (yes, not)
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Albert TRINH-DUC, MD, Centre Hospitalier St ESPRIT

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 20, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 20, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CHSEsprit AGEN

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cross-Sectional Studies

Clinical Trials on Dukes scale

3
Subscribe