COVID-19 Outbreak Consequences for Outpatients Followed in PRM (Handicall)

May 20, 2020 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Assessment of the Consequences of the Abrupt Interruption of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Consultations During the Quarantine Period in France Between 2020 March 17th and May 11th

Objectives This survey aims at reporting the immediate impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on outpatients followed in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM). It focuses on the disruption of PRM healthcare services during the quarantine period in France between 2020 March 17th and May 11th and on its medical consequences.

Method This observational study was conducted in the PRM department of a French University Hospital. Outpatients whose PRM medical consultation had been cancelled were contacted by phone between April 9th, 2020 and May 7th, 2020. A structured questionnaire was fulfilled for each patient.

Demographical and medical data were recorded, including the disabling diseases motivating the PRM outpatients' follow-up. The necessity to perform an immediate phone consultation or to schedule an urgent consultation within the next 3 weeks constituted the main judgment criterion. Other recorded criteria were: the reason for this urgent need of a medical consultation, the access to other medical services during the quarantine period, the interruption of home-based rehabilitation services and its perceived consequences for the patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The PRM Department of Montpellier University Hospital usually provides between 8500 and 9500 medical consultations/year. A total of 830 medical consultations have been cancelled during the lockdown for COVID-19 between March 17th, 2020, and May 11th, 2020. This survey was approved by the local Institutional Review Board (IRB accreditation number: 19871).

Procedure Phone calls were performed by residents. These young doctors worked in the PRM Department for 4 months before the beginning of the outbreak and were used to the PRM medical practices of the senior practitioners. They received a special dedicated education before they start calling the patients. They fulfilled a structured questionnaire for each patient. Each resident was supervised by a senior MD. A personalized daily appointment was organized with the group of residents to check for difficulties in recording the data and to answer any question from them. Questionnaires were collected each day and data were daily implemented in a dedicated database.

Data recorded Descriptive data concerning age, description of the underlying disease, and delay from the cancelled consultation were recorded at the beginning of the call.

The main Judgment criterion is the necessity to schedule a medical consultation within the next 3 weeks: immediate telephone consultation for urgent but easy situations (like refilling a prescription or advising the patient), or short-term consultation within the next three weeks. Other patients have been proposed for a delayed consultation within the next 3 months.

Secondary objectives are: 1/ the reason for this urgent need of a medical consultation within the next 3 weeks, 2/ the category of patients for whom this need was the most prevalent, 3/the relationship between the date of the cancelled consultation and the feeling of emergency for reprogramming it, 4/ the disruption of home-based or community-based rehabilitation and its consequences for patients, and 5/ the access to other medical services for those patients during the quarantine period.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

467

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • UH Montpellier

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Outpatients from an university hospital PRM Department

Description

Inclusion criteria:

- All outpatients whose medical appointment had been cancelled between March 17th and May 11th 2020 were contacted by phone between April 9th and May 7th 2020.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients who had spontaneously called the hospital to ask for reprogramming the cancelled consultation before being contacted
  • Patients followed by the three senior MD who preferred to call patients by themselves and who didn't want to fulfill the questionnaires for personnel reasons
  • Patient who didn't answer after three phone calls

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients necessitating the scheduling of a medical consultation
Time Frame: 1 day (Time of the phone call)
Proportion of patients necessitating the scheduling of a medical consultation within the next 3 weeks
1 day (Time of the phone call)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the reason for this urgent need of a medical consultation
Time Frame: 1 day (Time of the phone call)
the reason for this urgent need of a medical consultation
1 day (Time of the phone call)
the access to other medical services during the quarantine period
Time Frame: 1 day (Time of the phone call)
the access to other medical services during the quarantine period
1 day (Time of the phone call)
the interruption of home-based rehabilitation services
Time Frame: 1 day (Time of the phone call)
the interruption of home-based rehabilitation services and its perceived consequences for the patients
1 day (Time of the phone call)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Isabelle LAFFONT, Professor, University Hospital, Montpellier

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

May 9, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

NC

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

3
Subscribe