- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04441060
Suicide Risk Scale and Distress Intervention for the Patients With Chronic Medical Illness or Physical Disabilities
Development of a Suicide Risk Scale and Distress Intervention for the Patients With Chronic Medical Illness or Physical Disabilities
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The aims of this study are developments of distress intervention and a suicidal risk scale for the patients with chronic medical illness or physical disabilities.
To achieve the aims, multidisciplinary team is organized such as doctors of internal medicine, rehabilitative medicine, psychiatrist specialized in psychosomatics, psychologist, nurse, social worker and researchers.
Before developing the intervention and scale, review of literature about intervention, suicide, management system of chronic illness, several scales and others are done. Also, qualitative interview and self report scale with those patients are done to figure out what bothers them most, how they feel, and what kind of help they need.
Based on collected data, means of intervention is carefully selected and further review of literature is proceeded. Also, questions which describe patients' feeling, discomfort, and need are made. Moreover, modified management system of chronic illness is planned to develop to link between those who need help among patients and multidisciplinary team members.
Once, the intervention is developed, subject group and control group are recruited in stroke patients, and the intervention is simulated. The change of distress is measured before and after the intervention, and 1 month later the intervention is finished with several tools such as WHOQOL-BREF, Perceived Stress Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Acceptance of Disability Scale, Participation Scale, Pain Belief & Perception Inventory, Insomnia Severity Index, FACIT-Fatigue, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, digit span, trail making test, stroop test, verbal fluency test.
Also, newly developed questions and other scales are performed among patients to determine whether the newly developed questions are appropriate and how well they reflect their difficulties and feelings. After selecting the appropriate questions, the revised version will be tested by the patients twice in a different time frame.
If the revised version is appraised appropriate, it will be distributed as a cell phone application.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 16801
- Seoul National University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with chronic illness or physical disabilities (Heart failure, Chronic kidney disease, Stroke patients)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have other severe illness such as cancer, severe memory impairment or intellectual disabilities and others
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: distress intervention subject group
Distress intervention program will be developed, and applied to the subject group, and they will be assessed before and after the intervention program with several tools.
|
Distress intervention is not fully developed yet, but we are working on the development of distress intervention based on CBT & Mindfulness-based program.
|
|
No Intervention: distress intervention control group
No intervention will be applied to the control group.
They will be assessed before and after the intervention program with same tools with subject group.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of life: World Health Organization's quality of life instrument -short version (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time Frame: baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
Quality of life was assessed three times using the World Health Organization's quality of life instrument - short version (WHOQOL-BREF); before and after the intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished.
The amount of quality of life change will be one of the primary outcomes.
|
baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
|
Stress: Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10)
Time Frame: baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
Stress was assessed three times using Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10); before and after the intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished.
The amount of Stress change will be one of the primary outcomes.
|
baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
|
Resilience: Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CDRS)
Time Frame: baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
Resilience was assessed three times using Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CDRS); before and after the intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished.
The amount of resilience change will be one of the primary outcomes.
|
baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
|
Self-esteem: Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
Time Frame: baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
Self-esteem was assessed three times using Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale; before and after the intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished.
The amount of Self-esteem change will be one of the primary outcomes.
|
baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
|
Acceptance of disability: Acceptance of Disability Scale
Time Frame: baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
Acceptance of disability was assessed three times using Acceptance of Disability Scale; before and after the intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished.
The amount of acceptance of disability change will be one of the primary outcomes.
|
baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
|
Social participation: Participation Scale
Time Frame: baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
Social participation was assessed three times using Participation Scale; before and after the intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished.
The amount of Social participation change will be one of the primary outcomes.
|
baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
|
Pain: Pain belief & Perception inventory (PBPI)
Time Frame: baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
Pain was assessed three times using Pain belief & Perception inventory (PBPI); before and after the intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished.
The amount of pain change will be one of the primary outcomes.
|
baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
|
Insomnia: Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Time Frame: baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
Insomnia was assessed three times using Insomnia Severity Index (ISI); before and after the intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished.
The amount of Insomnia change will be one of the primary outcomes.
|
baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
|
Fatigue: FACIT-Fatigue
Time Frame: baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
Fatigue was assessed three times using FACIT-Fatigue; before and after the intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished.
The amount of fatigue change will be one of the primary outcomes.
|
baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
|
Depression, Anxiety: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time Frame: baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
Depression and anxiety was assessed three times using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; before and after the intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished.
The amount of depression and anxiety change will be one of the primary outcomes.
The 14-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale comprises two subscales assessing anxiety and depression.
Participants were asked to rate each item on a 4- point Likert scale (0-3); subscale scores ranged from 0 to 21.
A cutoff score of 8 was applied to define clinical level of anxiety and depression.
|
baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
|
Attention: Digit Span Test
Time Frame: baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
Attention was assessed three times using the Digit Span Test; before and after the intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished.
The Digit Span test is a neuropsychological test in most common use for measuring attention-concentration and working memory.
The amount of Digit Span Test result (percentile score) change will be one of the primary outcomes.
|
baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
|
Attention: Trail Making Test
Time Frame: baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
Attention was assessed three times using the Trail Making Test; before and after the intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished.
The Trail Making Test is a widely used neuropsychological measure that is known as a test of psychomotor speed, attention, sequencing, mental flexibility.
The amount of Trail Making Test result (time to complete test) change will be one of the primary outcomes.
|
baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
|
Attention: Stoop Color-Word Test
Time Frame: baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
Attention was assessed three times using the Stoop Color-Word Test; before and after the intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished.
The Stroop color word test is useful to examines the frontal lobe function of selective attention and inhibition.
The amount of Stoop Color-Word Test results (Time taken to perform, number performed correctly, number of errors) change will be one of the primary outcomes.
|
baseline, within a week after the end of the full course of intervention, and 1 month later after the intervention is finished
|
|
Suicide risk : Korea-Suicide Risk Scale (the name can be changed later)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Suicide risk scale will be developed and compared with other known tools.
The scale has no definite name yet, but it can be called as Korea-Suicide Risk Scale for now.
A score will be reported on a scale, the higher score, the severe the suicidal risk.
About 90 questions are developed for the scale, and out of them, meaningful questions will be selected through large-scale interview & comparison with other scales about suicide during the study.
We are not sure how many questions are selected by now, so the minimum or maximum score cannot be decided so far.
Though, the questions have 4 point scale from 0 to 3.
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Bong-jin Hahm, M.D., Ph.D., Seoul National University Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HL19C0039
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.