Emotion Regulation Interventions for Preventing Collegiate Escalations in Drinking (PACER)

August 29, 2022 updated by: Beth Russell, University of Connecticut

Emotion Regulation Interventions for Preventing Collegiate Escalations in Drinking: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Establish Acceptability, Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy

In the most recent National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), college aged respondents between 18 and 25 years old reported the highest alcohol use rates (over 58%) as well as the highest rates of binge drinking of any age group. High alcohol use/abuse in college students is associated with myriad negative consequences, including fatal and nonfatal injuries and overdoses, impaired academic and vocational performance, violence and other crime, legal problems, unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases, and social problems. The National Comorbidity Survey underscores that use initiated in this period is not just experimental and recreational but may have lasting effects on consumption trajectories: For the majority of adults diagnosed alcohol use disorders, onset occurred during emerging adulthood. During this stage of development, vast changes in emotion regulation (ER) take place, particularly age-related shifts in the strategies used to manage distress that may lead to alcohol use/abuse (i.e., emotion suppression, inhibitory control, and cognitive reappraisal. Substantial evidence suggests that deficits in ER are strongly related to patterns of alcohol use in young adults. In particular, deficits in the self regulation of discomfort and distress, called distress tolerance, predict alcohol use - specifically, motivation and urgency for use, escalations in consumption, and the development of dependence that may be indicative of alcohol use disorders. Emerging adults who turn to alcohol as a way of coping with distressing emotions are most at risk for heavy alcohol use into adulthood and more severe negative alcohol consequences. Given the variable effectiveness of existing approaches for reducing college students' alcohol use, The investigators contend that interventions may be differentially effective depending on individual characteristics. In particular, students with difficulties in managing distress and discomfort may benefit from more intensive interventions that promote effective ER compared to treatment as usual; further, other background characteristics may predict the efficacy and acceptability of each type of ER intervention. In this R34, investigators will test the acceptability/ feasibility and preliminary efficacy of two complementary interventions (Yoga and Distress Tolerance) on preventing alcohol use in a randomized controlled trial of 180 high-risk college students relative to treatment as usual. Investigators will assess participants' alcohol use (self-report and biomarker measures) and emotion regulation (ER) at baseline along with physiological discomfort sensitivity and psychosocial predictors of treatment efficacy over time, including a post-treatment follow-up. Study aims include:

  1. Test feasibility/acceptability of two ER interventions among high-risk emerging adults by documenting rates of recruitment, retention, adherence, and satisfaction.
  2. Examine trends in intervention acceptability based on baseline characteristics (i.e., associations between participant retention and participant-rated acceptability and age, gender, family characteristics/dynamics, and predispositions to discomfort tolerance).
  3. Test preliminary efficacy of the ER interventions on measures of ER and alcohol use. Hypothesis: Participants in both intervention groups will see greater improvements in ER and alcohol use outcomes compared to the TAU control group.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

197

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • Storrs, Connecticut, United States, 06269-0001
        • University of Connecticut

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Students who report levels of ER difficulties exceeding the mean reported scores on the Difficulties with Emotion Regulation Scale for college students
  • Students who screen positive on first 3 items of the AUDIT (called the "AUDIT-C" on which a score of 4 or more for men or 3 or more for women is indicative of hazardous drinking)
  • Students with a status as an enrolled student at UCONN with at least a year of on-campus engagement expected before graduation or a commitment to completing all study activities.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students who are actively psychotic
  • Students who have less than a year of on campus engagement expected before graduation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Yoga
60 minute sessions of guided yoga in small group format
1 hour of group format, guided yoga practice
Active Comparator: Distress Tolerance
60 minutes sessions of guided didactic distress tolerance skill building in small group format
1 hour didactic group format, to develop distress tolerance skills
Other Names:
  • PRISM (Promoting Resilience in Self-Management)
No Intervention: Treatment as Usual
Those recruited through Student Health and Wellness will complete the university standard BASICS intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Daily Drinking Questionnaire
Time Frame: Measured over a 3 month frame, can be used to calculate weekly or daily consumption
Measures frequency and quantity of alcohol consumption (scores range from 0 to unlimited) where lower scores indicate better outcomes
Measured over a 3 month frame, can be used to calculate weekly or daily consumption

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Distress tolerance scale
Time Frame: Measure authors Simons and Gaher do not specify; PACER will use 90 days
Measures individual's ability to maintain goal-directed behavior while distressed (scores range from 16 to 80) where higher scores indicate better outcomes
Measure authors Simons and Gaher do not specify; PACER will use 90 days
PACER Feasibility - participation
Time Frame: Participation is dichotomously recorded at each engagement opportunity through study completion (up to 8 months)
Participant participation rates (scores range from 0% to 100%) where higher scores indicate better outcomes
Participation is dichotomously recorded at each engagement opportunity through study completion (up to 8 months)
Rates of excessive drinking
Time Frame: 30 days
Recent reports of heavy (5+ drinks ) in one sitting (scores range from 0 to unlimited) where lower scores indicate better outcomes
30 days
CORE survey of substance use
Time Frame: 30 days
Core frequency measures of substance use from the list of substances, including alcohol, where lower scores indicate better outcomes
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Beth Russell, PhD, University of Connecticut

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1R34AA027455-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Abuse

Clinical Trials on Yoga

3
Subscribe